2016
Carnegie Traditional

High School - Gateway 1

Back to High School Overview
Cover for Carnegie Traditional
Note on review tool versions

See the series overview page to confirm the review tool version used to create this report.

Loading navigation...

Gateway Ratings Summary

Focus & Coherence

Gateway 1 - Partially Meets Expectations
61%
Criterion 1.1: Focus & Coherence
11 / 18

Criterion 1.1: Focus & Coherence

11 / 18

Focus and Coherence: The instructional materials are coherent and consistent with "the high school standards that specify the mathematics which all students should study in order to be college and career ready" (p. 57 of CCSSM).

The instructional materials partially meet the expectations for attending to the shifts of focus and coherence. The strength of the materials is the opportunity for students to learn the content that is widely applicable as prerequisites for post-secondary education. The series partially attends to a number of standards and did not meet expectations for having viable opportunities for students to engage in the modeling cycle. The context and real-life scenarios did meet expectations. The series did meet expectations for providing explicit and useful connections within and across courses, but it partially meets expectations for connections to mathematics from the middle grades.

Narrative Only
Narrative Only
Narrative Only

Indicator 1a

Narrative Only

The materials focus on the high school standards.*

Indicator 1a.i

2 / 4

The materials attend to the full intent of the mathematical content contained in the high school standards for all students.

The materials partially attend to the full intent of the mathematical content contained in the high school standards for all students. In most cases, the standard was addressed, clearly aligned and fully developed throughout the instructional materials. However, there were several instances where the instructional materials addressed the standard(s) to which it was aligned, but a particular component of the standard was not evident. In only a few instances were standards not clearly incorporated into the materials.

The following standards were identified as being especially strong/exemplary in terms of attending to the mathematical content:

  • F-IF.2: This standard is fully met. Function notation is consistently used throughout the entire series.
  • G-CO.6: This standard, using geometric descriptions for transformations, is addressed extensively. Examples of lessons addressing this standard are found in the Geometry materials on pages 24, 52 and 523.
  • G-GMD.4: This standard requires students to identify the shapes of two-dimensional cross-sections of three-dimensional objects and identify three-dimensional objects generated by rotations of two-dimensional objects. In Geometry, lessons 4.1, 4.4, 4.5 and 4.7 include rotations of rectangles, circles and triangles as well as the cross-sections of cylinders, spheres, cubes, pyramids and cones. Additionally, the lessons include applications of the volume formulas for cylinders and cones.

The following standards were identified as not being fully attended to in the instructional materials:

  • N-RN.1: The material provides an explanation of how the definition of the meaning of rational exponents follows from extending the properties of integer exponents but does not provide students the opportunity to explain themselves (Algebra 1 and Algebra 2).
  • N-Q.1: Units are attended to repetitively throughout the instructional materials, especially in Chapters 1 and 2 of Algebra 1, where this standard is addressed. However, the portion of this standard regarding interpreting the scale and the origin in graphs and data displays is not called out in the problems. The lessons begin with a table of values and then use that data to create a graph (sections 2.1, 2.2, 2.6). There were not student or teacher prompts that provided an opportunity for discussion, nor were there explanations or clarification about how the data in the table was used to create a scale for the graph.
  • N-Q.3: Determining level of accuracy is addressed on a basic level in the Algebra 1 materials in ways such as, "It isn't possible to have .3 boxes of popcorn so we must round up to the next box." Opportunities were not found that allowed students to consider the level of accuracy needed in ways such as, “Should we measure in feet or inches or sixteenths of inches?” or “Are integers or decimals two or three decimal places appropriate for the solution to a system?”
  • A-REI.11: This standard requires students to "explain why the x-coordinates of the points where the graphs of the equations y = f(x) and y = g(x) intersect are the solutions of the equation f(x) = g(x); find the solutions approximately." This is addressed only for linear and quadratic equations. Polynomial, rational, absolute value, exponential, and logarithmic functions that are specified in the standard are not addressed in any of the instructional materials.
  • G-CO.2: The instructional materials provide students with the opportunity to represent transformations in the plane in a variety of ways. Students translate by moving the individual points of an angle (Geometry, page 52). Students also cut out the copy of a polygon and move it around the coordinate plane (Geometry, page 515). The materials do not address "describing transformations and functions." The materials have students analyze what happens to the x-values of the points of a figure and the y-value of points in a figure (Geometry, pages 517-518), but the materials do not have them write the transformation as a function.
  • G-CO.13: Inscribed equilateral triangle, square, and regular hexagon are not included.
  • G-GPE.5: Slope criteria is addressed in Geometry, lessons 3.1-3, but not as proofs.
  • G-CO.4: Several sections of materials throughout the Geometry materials focus on experimenting with transformations in the coordinate plane. Materials provide ample opportunities to translate, reflect, and rotate line segments and figures in sections 1.2, 1.4, 1.5, and 7.1 of Geometry. However, evidence was not found in which the definitions of rotations and reflections are developed in terms of angles, circles, perpendicular lines, and parallel lines as outlined in this standard.
  • S-ID.4: This standard requires students to: “use mean and standard deviation to fit it to a normal distribution and to estimate population percentages. Recognize there are data sets for which such a procedure is not appropriate. Use calculators, spreadsheets and tables to estimate areas under the normal curve.” Problems were not found that included data sets where this procedure was not appropriate. There were no options for determining the area under the normal curve other than the text materials providing the percent for each interval.
  • S-IC.4 and S-IC.5: Evidence was not found of the use of simulation to attend to the standard.
  • S-CP.1: The instructional materials attend to the mathematical intent of the standard in that the terms, sample space and outcome, are consistently used throughout the probability sections of the materials. There is discussion of disjoint, intersecting, and complementary events (Geometry, sections 14.1, 14.2). However, there is no formal use of the term "union" used in the materials. Additionally, this standard is aligned to lessons beyond where the publisher shows in the alignment documents.

The following standards were identified as NOT ALIGNED to the mathematical content:

  • N-RN.3: This standard is not addressed, although Algebra 1, lesson 14.1 is related. There is a statement that operations of rational numbers is closed; however, no explanation is provided. Furthermore, there was no evidence regarding the operations of adding and multiplying of irrational numbers as closed operations.
  • G-MG.2: This standard was not identified in the publisher materials as being addressed in the materials nor was evidence of this standard found during the review process.

Additional notes about alignment:

  • G-CO.9: This standard requires students to prove theorems about lines and angles. There are lessons throughout Chapter 2 of Geometry about writing proofs, lessons about lines and angles, and tasks that allow students to develop their understanding and then write proofs. However, one concern about this particular standard is that the standard is aligned to lessons where the standard is not specifically addressed. For instance, Geometry, lessons 2.1 and 2.3 contains prerequisite skills in the lesson that lead up to the standard rather than addressing the actual standard that is aligned to a given lesson. These lessons are not actually aligned to any high school standards and are only aligned to G-CO.9 in the alignment guide provided by the publisher.

Indicator 1a.ii

0 / 2

The materials attend to the full intent of the modeling process when applied to the modeling standards.

Materials do not meet the expectation for attending to the full intent of the modeling process when applied to the modeling standards.

Each set of materials in the series includes a great number of lessons that contain a variety of components of the modeling process described in the CCSSM. However, these lessons are typically scaffolded to such an extent that students do not have an opportunity to work through the entire cycle of the modeling process independently. There are multiple applications, tasks and examples where restructuring the lesson to address the components of modeling would allow students to fully engage in the modeling process as required in the CCSSM. Students should have opportunities to be given a task/question/problem and then develop their own solution strategies, select the best tools for solving a problem or set of problems, create their own charts, graphs, and/or equations, evaluate and revise their and other answers, and report on their work - all for one task/question/problem rather than a part of the process for several different problems.

Examples of when and how components of the modeling process are attended to, and how they fall short, include:

  • Algebra 1 includes a blood alcohol content problem (section 16.4). Students are asked to compute, interpret, and report their work through a series of scaffolded steps. However, not all six steps of the modeling process are included. For instance, students do not choose a model to use – they are given a table to fill in and an equation to use to find the values.
  • In Algebra I, lesson 2.1: The Plane! Modeling Linear Situations, students model the height of a plane in flight. Students look at a number of models (graphs, tables, algebraic expressions) and interpret the models in terms of the context, but in every case, they are provided explicit support including partially completed tables and step-by-step directions.
  • Algebra 1 and Algebra 2 materials provide multiple opportunities to interpret features of graphs and tables (F-IF.4), yet lack all the steps included in the modeling process to meet the full intent of the modeling standard which this indicator requires.
  • In Geometry, Lesson 15.5, the problem is about the probability the dart will hit a shaded area (page 1212) and does provide students with an opportunity to formulate a solution path. However, the problem does not attend to other aspects of the modeling process. Students are not asked to validate their solution beyond "show your work;" they do not report their findings or revise their processes.

Notably, the “formulate” part of the modeling provided in the CCSSM is consistently lacking in the lessons provided in the materials. The CCSSM states that students should be “formulating a model by creating and selecting geometric, graphical, tabular, algebraic, or statistical representations that describe relationships between the variables." There was limited evidence that students were required to formulate a process for solving problems or work through the modeling process on their own.

Indicator 1b

Narrative Only

The materials provide students with opportunities to work with all high school standards and do not distract students with prerequisite or additional topics.

Indicator 1b.i

2 / 2

The materials, when used as designed, allow students to spend the majority of their time on the content from CCSSM widely applicable as prerequisites for a range of college majors, postsecondary programs, and careers.

The instructional materials meet the criterion of expectation that allow for students to spend the majority of their time on content from CCSSM widely applicable prerequisites. The scope-and-sequence provided shows a strong focus on the standards necessary for college majors, postsecondary programs and careers. Analysis showed this scope-and-sequence to be largely, though not entirely, accurate.

For example, Geometry, lesson 10.5 is aligned to G-CO.9, G-CO.12 and G-SRT.8 by the publisher.

Lesson 18 is “Exterior and Interior Angle Measurement Interactions: Sum of the Exterior Angles of a Polygon.” The components of the lesson have students writing formulas for the sum of the exterior angles of polygons, calculating the sum of the exterior angles of any polygon, writing formulas for the measure of each exterior angle of a regular polygon, calculating the measures of exterior angles and finding the number of sides given angle measures. Below is detail of how this lesson does/does not align to the standards the publisher’s content map indicated for the lesson.

  • G-CO.9: In Lesson 10.5, students use the theorems about lines and angles but the lesson is not designed to include proofs of either the theorems listed in the standard or other theorems. In fact, none of the learning goals for the section indicate that students will engage in proofs of any kind in this section.
  • G-CO.12: This standard is accurately aligned – students are making constructions in this lesson.
  • G.SRT.8: Students utilize trig ratios to solve one problem in the lesson. Trig ratios are not listed as a learning goal and are not an emphasis in the lesson.
  • G-CO.13: This standard DOES align to the lesson but is not mentioned at all by the publisher in either the Geometry text or alignment map for the course. This standard requires students to construct a square and a regular hexagon inscribed in a circle. Both of those constructions are in problem 3 of this lesson. The alignment document provided by the publisher aligns lesson 1.7 to this standard, but that is incorrect, too. The standard requires an equilateral triangle to be constructed and the triangle that is constructed in lesson 1.7 is not necessarily an equilateral triangle and therefore does not align to the standard.

Prerequisite material was mostly limited to “Warm-Up” tasks and used in a reasonable way to support meeting high school standards. Standards from Grades 6-8 are reviewed but not to an extent that is inappropriate. For example, Geometry, Chapter 14 begins by reviewing the middle school probability standards. A significant amount of time is not spent on this review, and it is an appropriate use of class time. After the first two review sections (approximately 135 minutes of class time according to the pacing guide), the other four lessons in the chapter transition to the high school probability standards. This was the only instance identified where more than just a portion of a lesson was spent on below grade-level standards, and the use of the review was appropriate in the context of the chapter and lessons.

The following examples show how the standards/clusters specified in the Publisher's Criteria for Widely Applicable Standards are developed in the materials.

  • The N-RN standards are included in both Algebra 1 and 2 materials; however, only three sections can be aligned to this strand of standards (Algebra 1 - 5.5 and 14.1, Algebra 2 - 9.4).
  • Many of the Algebra standards span throughout Algebra 1 and Algebra 2 materials in the series. Evidence for this is found in Chapters 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 11, 12, 13 and 15 for Algebra 1; evidence is found in Chapters 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11 and 12 for Algebra 2.
  • F-IF standards span throughout Algebra 1 and Algebra 2 materials in the series. A variety of functions are interpreted and analyzed. Algebra 1 focuses on linear, quadratic, and exponential while Algebra 2 focuses on quadratic, polynomial, exponential, logarithmic, rational, and trigonometric. Both Algebra 1 and Algebra 2 have students graph functions and identify/analyze features of those functions.
  • S-ID.2 is in both Algebra 1 (throughout Chapter 8) and Algebra 2 (Section 15.1). Students build on their understanding of statistics from Grades 6-8 to compare the center and spread of a data set. Multiple representations are used: box-and-whisker plot, histogram, and stem-and-leaf plot.

The instructional materials do not include distracting content that is beyond than content expected to be taught in Algebra 1, Geometry, and Algebra 2.

Indicator 1b.ii

2 / 4

The materials, when used as designed, allow students to fully learn each standard.

When used as designed, the instructional materials reviewed partially meet the expectation for allowing students to fully learn each standard.

The following are examples of where the instructional materials provide opportunities for students to fully learn non-plus standards.

A-SSE.1: The materials give students many opportunities to develop a deep understanding of these standards. Algebra 1 addresses these standards throughout with some specific examples in lessons 2.1, 2.2, 3.2, 3.4 and 5.1. Algebra 2 also continually makes reference to the components of expressions and equations and asks students to comment on the connection to the context of the problem.

The following are examples of where the instructional materials provide opportunities for students to partially learn non-plus standards.

A-CED.4: In Algebra 1, lesson 3.3, students re-write the temperature conversion formulas to solve for Celsius and Fahrenheit. This is the one example that was identified as addressing the aspect of the standard where students are required to rearrange formulas to highlight a quantity of interest, using the same reasoning as in solving equations.

A-REI.1: The instructional materials provided insufficient opportunities for students to explain each step in solving a simple equation. Algebra 1, section 2.1 featured four examples in the textbook that required students to solve an equation and justify reasoning, although the "justifying" was overlooked as these steps were not included in the teacher edition. Justifications must be written out for a solved equation in Algebra 1, section 14.2. This section, however, is not aligned to this standard (it is aligned to N-RN.3), and the focus of this lesson is on the properties of real numbers rather than solving equations.

N-Q.1: Students have sufficient opportunities to interpret units and scale in the context of a variety of problems; however, the lessons always provide the units and scale. To fully meet the standard, students should be provided the opportunity to decide on units and scale.

N-RN.1: Algebra 1, Lesson 5.5 gives justification for properties of rational exponents but does not build to student explanations. The properties are shown with an example, and then students are expected to use them. These are not properties students are expected to know from prior grades, so the examples/explanations are not adequate and do not attend to developing conceptual understanding of the properties of rational exponents.

N-RN.2: Rewriting the radicals and rational exponents using the properties is included in Algebra 1, page 344; however, there are limited instances for student practice or development of the rules and few numbers without variables are included.

F-LE.3: Algebra 1, lesson 5.1, addresses this standard when comparing simple and compound interest. Algebra 2, lesson 5.4, also addresses this standard. However, the quantity and direct computations of problems in these lessons is not sufficient for mastery of this standard.

F-LE.4: The emphasis of the lessons aligned to this standard was on using the change of base formula. The components of the equation were not addressed, nor was base 2, which is specified in the standard.

A-SSE.3b: Algebra 1, lesson 2.7 primarily uses completing the square as a method to find zeros of a quadratic equation (ample opportunities for practice in textbook, skills practice, and assignment books). Two examples in the material (page 778) use completing the square to identify the vertex of a quadratic. The instructional materials do not use the language of maximum or minimum.

A-APR.6: No lessons ask students to use long division in the way specified by the standard -- that is, to recognize that division allows an equivalent form of the expression. The process of division is included, but the connection between the process and the zeros is not clear.

Indicator 1c

2 / 2

The materials require students to engage in mathematics at a level of sophistication appropriate to high school.

The instructional materials meet the expectation for being coherent and consistent with the high school standards that specify the mathematics which all students should study in order to be college- and career-ready. In addition, the materials require students to engage in mathematics at a level of sophistication appropriate to high school.

The materials provide students with opportunities to engage in real-world problems throughout the courses. The students engage in problems that use number values that represent real-life values - fractions, decimals and integers. Solutions to problems also are typical of real-life situations. The context of most of the scenarios are relevant to high school students. Examples of where each book in the series meets the full depth are:

Algebra 1 - Analyzing representations of functions (sections 1.2, 1.3), rational functions (sections 7.5, 8.4), exponential and logarithmic functions (sections 10.2, 11.5), optimization (section 12.3).

Geometry - Diagonals in 3-D (section 4.8), similar triangles (sections 6.4, 6.6), trigonometric ratios (9.2-9.4), probability (Chapter 14).

Algebra 2 - Linear equations and inequalities (sections 2.3, 2.6, 3.2, 3.4), systems of equations and inequalities (chapter 6, 7), quadratic functions (section 11.1), piecewise and step functions (sections 15.1, 15.2), "modeling" type problems (Chapter 16).

Students are often asked to evaluate the work of others--very often from problems done by one of the "Crew" -- characters that are students who are presented at the beginning of the materials that are supposed to represent other high school students working on the lessons.

Students are given ample opportunities to engage with most non-plus standards through the textbook lessons, skills practice, and student assignment book. The skills practice focuses on practice of basic skills. Each section has a minimum of one worked-out example provided as a model that can be helpful for lower-performing students. The student assignment book focuses on applying skills to real-world scenarios and extending general knowledge to multi-step problems.

Indicator 1d

2 / 2

The materials are mathematically coherent and make meaningful connections in a single course and throughout the series, where appropriate and where required by the Standards.

The materials meet the expectation for fostering coherence through meaningful connections in a single course and throughout the series. Both teacher and student materials provide opportunities to build new knowledge from current knowledge. Connections between and across multiple standards are made in meaningful ways.

The student and teacher materials often refer back to prior lessons to make connections and/or build understanding. Specific examples include:

  • Algebra 1, lesson 5.2 (page 417) refers to previously defined concepts such as regression equation and coefficient of determination, which were introduced in chapters 9, 13 and 16 of the same course.
  • Algebra 2, lesson 1.5 refers back to lesson 1.3 in the same course.

Student materials provide "Warm ups" at the beginning of each section that are primarily used to connect new learning to prior learning (Grades 6-8 or high school level). Specific examples are:

  • Algebra 1, lesson 11.4, uses the distributive property to introduce factoring (learned in Grades 6-8).
  • Geometry, lesson 11.1, introduces circles with a warm-up on drawing a circle with a given radius or diameter and then finding circumference and area (learned in Grades 6-8).
  • Algebra 2, lesson 2.1, identifies different forms of quadratic equations (learned in Algebra 1).

Learning goals are explicitly stated at beginning of each section ("In this lesson, you will…"); however, connections to prior learning are not explicitly made (i.e. "Previously you learned…).

Indicator 1e

1 / 2

The materials explicitly identify and build on knowledge from Grades 6--8 to the High School Standards.

The materials partially meet the expectation for explicitly identifying and building on knowledge from Grades 6-8 to the High School Standards. Sometimes the material reviews some Grade 6-8 concepts, but not in a distracting or excessive way; rather, the material is presented in a manner that refreshes students and prepares them for the new concept.

Grades 6-8 standards are not clearly identified in teacher and student materials. However, there is a column labeled "Access Prior Knowledge" in the alignment documents that sometimes specified a middle school CCSSM to which the lesson is aligned. There are not very many explicit connections that link the lessons to prior learning for the teachers.

Examples of how lessons connect to middle school content include:

  • Students' exposure to calculating area and perimeter of two-dimensional shapes and calculating volume and surface area for three-dimensional shapes is built upon at the high school level through the use of application problems. The connection between two-dimensional figures and three-dimensional figures is a focus through the study of cross sections. Additionally, students learn how to calculate area and perimeter of a two-dimensional figure on a coordinate plane.
  • Cluster 7.RP: Ratios and proportional relationships is built upon at the high school level when learning about similarity of figures and related proportionality theorems (i.e., triangle proportionality theorem, proportional side theorem, proportional segments theorem, and triangle midsegment theorem).
  • The heading "Apply and extend previous understandings of operations with fractions to add, subtract, multiply, and divide rational numbers" under cluster 7.NS builds the foundation for the high school standard of A-APR.7 in which students rewrite rational expressions and perform operations with rational expressions.
  • N-RN.2 closely aligns with 8.EE.1 in the Grade 8 standards. Materials require students to apply exponent rules in Algebra 1 (section 5.5) and Algebra 2 (section 9.4), but this does not go beyond the expectations for the middle school standard.
  • 8.EE.8 ("Analyze and solve pairs of simultaneous linear equations") connects to standards A-REI.5, A-REI.6, A-REI.7, A-REI.11, and A-REI.12 in which students solve a linear equation algebraically and graphically and extend this to solving and graphing systems of linear inequalities.
  • In Grade 8, students learn how to utilize the Pythagorean theorem to determine unknown lengths of sides of right triangles and calculate distances in a coordinate plane. At the high school level, students are expected to prove the theorem and apply the Pythagorean theorem and its converse in the context of real world problems. Furthermore, the Pythagorean theorem serves as an introduction to 45-45-90 and 30-60-90 triangles.

Indicator 1f

Narrative Only

The plus (+) standards, when included, are explicitly identified and coherently support the mathematics which all students should study in order to be college and career ready.

The plus standards are usually identified in the supplementary alignment document as (+) standards. They are not identified as plus standards within the materials even though the standards are explicitly stated (teachers would need to know which standards are plus standards to know this within the lessons). Furthermore, plus standards are often within lessons that include non-plus standards. One concern is that the plus content cannot be separated from the non-plus standards within a lesson. Also, the plus standards are often in a lesson in the middle of a chapter (Algebra 2, lesson 7.4 contains at least two plus standards but lesson 7.5 does not). In order for students to accomplish the tasks in lesson 7.5, they must complete most problems in lesson 7.4. Therefore, a teacher could not choose to leave out plus standards and still complete all of the lessons not aligned to the plus standards.

Number and Quantity Standards: Three of eighteen plus standards for number and quantity are included in materials (N-CN.3, N-CN.8, N-CN.9)

Algebra Standards: Two of the four plus standards for Algebra are included in materials (A-APR.5, A-APR.7) Algebra 2, section 8.2 covers all operations with rational numbers to fully address standard A-APR.7.

Functions Standards: Eight of the eleven plus standards for functions are included in the materials (F.IF.7d, F-BF.1c, F-BF.4b, F-BF.4c, F-BF.4d, F-BF.5, F-TF.3, F-TF.7). F-IF.7a is thoroughly covered in sections 7.1-7.4 of the Algebra 2 textbook. Trigonometric plus standards add to work with trigonometric functions in non-plus standards and make connections to college course work.

Geometry Standards: Five of the six plus standards for Geometry are included in the Geometry textbook (G-GMD.2, G-SRT.9, G-SRT.10, G-SRT.11, G-C.4). Trigonometric plus standards do not deter from students' work with non-plus standards in defining trig ratios and using trig ratios to solve problems involving right triangles.

Statistics Standards: Four of nine plus standards for statistics are included in the instructional materials (S.CP.8, S.CP.9 , S.MD.6 and S.MD.7).