K-2nd Grade - Gateway 1
Back to K-2nd Grade Overview
Note on review tool versions
See the series overview page to confirm the review tool version used to create this report.
- Our current review tool version is 2.0. Learn more
- Reports conducted using earlier review tools (v1.0 and v1.5) contain valuable insights but may not fully align with our current instructional priorities. Read our guide to using earlier reports and review tools
Loading navigation...
Gateway Ratings Summary
Alignment to Research-Based Practices
Alignment to Research-Based Practices and Standards for Foundational Skills InstructionGateway 1 (First Grade) - Partially Meets Expectations | 79% |
|---|---|
Criterion 1.1: Phonemic Awareness | 12 / 16 |
Criterion 1.2: Phonics (Decoding and Encoding) | 28 / 32 |
Criterion 1.3: Word Recognition and Word Analysis | 7 / 12 |
Criterion 1.4: Reading Fluency Development | 10 / 12 |
The Open Court Reading materials partially meet expectations for Gateway 1 in Grade 1 by providing systematic, research-based instruction in foundational literacy skills. Materials include a clear scope and sequence, explicit teacher modeling, and consistent routines that support phonemic awareness, phonics, high-frequency word recognition, and oral reading fluency. Students engage in regular opportunities to decode, encode, and reread connected text to build accuracy and automaticity, and assessments occur across the year to monitor progress. However, guidance for task-specific corrective feedback and assessment-based instructional adjustments is limited, and instruction in word analysis is intermittent and not systematically reinforced. Overall, materials provide coherent foundational skills instruction in Grade 1, with limitations in the depth and consistency of instructional feedback and use of assessment data to guide instruction.
Criterion 1.1: Phonemic Awareness
This criterion is non-negotiable. Materials must achieve a specified minimum score in this criterion to advance to the next gateway.
Materials emphasize explicit, systematic instruction of research-based and/or evidence-based phonemic awareness.
The Open Court Reading materials partially meet expectations for Criterion 1.1 in Grade 1 by providing a clear, research-based scope and sequence for phonemic awareness that progresses from simpler to more complex phoneme-level skills. Instruction is intentionally coordinated with the phonics scope and sequence and prioritizes phoneme isolation, blending, segmentation, and manipulation through daily lessons with explicit teacher modeling and consistent routines. Materials include cumulative instruction and regular assessment opportunities, supported by clear administration guidance, record-keeping tools, and defined performance benchmarks to monitor student progress. However, articulation support for accurate sound production is not systematically embedded across daily lessons, and guidance for using assessment results to inform targeted, in-the-moment instructional adjustments is general rather than consistently integrated into instruction. Overall, phonemic awareness instruction is systematic and aligned to developmental expectations, but variability in instructional depth and assessment-based follow-up limits the consistency of support across the Grade 1 year.
Indicator 1c
Scope and sequence clearly delineate the sequence in which phonemic awareness skills are to be taught, with a clear, evidence-based explanation for the expected hierarchy of phonemic awareness competence.
Materials contain a clear, evidence-based explanation for the expected sequence for teaching phonemic awareness skills.
Materials have a cohesive sequence of phonemic awareness instruction based on the expected hierarchy to build toward students’ immediate application of the skills.
Materials prioritize phonemic awareness instruction (isolation, blending, segmenting, manipulation) and introduce phonological sensitivity tasks (e.g., rhyming, syllables, onset-rime) only briefly and early in Kindergarten.
Materials contain a phonemic awareness sequence of instruction and practice aligned to the phonics scope and sequence.
The phonemic awareness scope and sequence in Open Court Reading meet the expectations for Indicator 1c. The materials contain a clear, research-based sequence for teaching phonemic awareness that progresses from simpler skills to more complex tasks. The scope and sequence follows a cohesive hierarchy aligned to the expected developmental progression and is intentionally coordinated with the phonics scope and sequence, ensuring that oral sound work supports students’ understanding of new letter-sound correspondences. Instruction focuses primarily on phoneme-level awareness, with limited attention to broader phonological activities rather the first two units.
Materials contain a clear, evidence-based explanation for the expected sequence for teaching phonemic awareness skills.
In Teacher Resources, Research, The Science of Reading in Open Court Reading, the research summary cites Shaywitz (2003), Stanovich (1986), and NICHD (2000), noting that phonemic awareness is initially taught as an oral skill, and that combining this instruction with letter-sound correspondences strengthens reading and spelling for all students, including English Learners and students with disabilities. It also highlights blending and segmentation as critical early literacy skills and recommends brief, explicit instruction aligned to a developmental progression (Snow, Burns & Griffin, 1998; Mott & Rutherford, 2012).
In the Teacher Resources, Program Overview, Phonological and Phonemic Awareness sections, the materials explain that the key to learning to read is identifying sounds and connecting them to letters. Instruction begins with larger phonological units such as sentences, words, rhymes, and syllables, and then progresses to phoneme-level skills including oral blending, segmentation, deletion, and substitution.
Materials have a cohesive sequence of phonemic awareness instruction based on the expected hierarchy to build toward students’ immediate application of the skills.
According to the Scope and Sequence, Phonological and Phonemic Awareness, the materials provide a daily progression that begins with broader phonological awareness skills and moves toward more complex phonemic awareness tasks. The sequence across the year includes:
Units 1-2 - Instruction begins with rhyming and listening for initial sounds, then progresses to phoneme blending and segmentation with initial and final consonants. Students also practice phoneme restoration (identifying and supplying a missing phoneme in a spoken word), medial vowel sounds, and simple substitution and deletion tasks.
Units 3-4 - Lessons expand practice to include word families, consonant blends, and additional segmentation tasks (initial, final, and medial positions). Students continue rhyming and riddle activities with applying skills in single-syllable words.
Units 5-6 - Instruction advances to more complex blending and segmentation with single-syllable words and consonant blends, as well as substitution and deletion tasks with both initial and final consonants.
Units 7-8 - Students review short- and long-vowel sounds and practice distinguishing between vowel sounds in initial and medial positions. Activities include Quick Change, Word Families, and Sound/Spelling Chain games.
Units 9-12 - Instruction emphasizes advanced phonemic awareness, including contrasts of short and long vowel sounds, internal consonant substitutions, and digraph riddle games, while continuing to revisit previously taught skills for cumulative practice.
Materials attend to developing phonemic awareness skills and avoid spending excess time on phonological sensitivity tasks.
According to the Scope and Sequence, Phonological and Phonemic Awareness, the materials introduce a small number of phonological sensitivity activities, such as rhyming games or “Which Doesn’t Belong?” warm-ups, primarily in Units 1-2.
Beginning in Unit 3, lessons focus on phonemic awareness tasks, including phoneme segmentation, blending, substitution, and deletion in initial, medial, and final positions.
Across Units 3-12, phonemic awareness skills are emphasized daily, while phonological sensitivity tasks are limited to brief warm-ups.
This evidence shows that the materials provide only limited attention to phonological sensitivity, while the majority of instructional time is devoted to phonemic awareness skills, ensuring that excess time is not spent on broader phonological tasks.
Materials contain a phonemic awareness sequence of instruction and practice aligned to the phonics scope and sequence.
In Unit 1, Lesson 2, Day 1, Phonemic Awareness, students engage in Phoneme Substitution: Initial Consonants by changing the first sound in words such as dinosaur (e.g., /d/ -> /m/ to to minosaur). Students also practice Phoneme Segmentation: Final Consonants by repeating only the last sound in words such as peach (/ch/), rake (/k/), and sob (/b/). In the same lesson, during Phonics and Decoding, the teacher introduces /d/ spelled d using Routine 1: Introducing Sounds and Spellings.
In Unit 6, Lesson 2, Day 3, Phonemic Awareness, Phoneme Segmentation (Individual Sounds), the teacher says words such as price /p/ /r/ /ī/ /s/, rack /r/ /a/ /k/, and act /a/ /k/ /t/, and students repeat each word sound by sound. In the same lesson, Introduce the Sound/Spelling, the teacher introduces the Long A sound spelled ai_ using Sound/Spelling Card 27.
This evidence shows that oral phonemic awareness activities are systematically organized to support the phonics scope and sequence. Instruction in skills such as segmentation and substitution parallels the introduction of new letter-sound correspondences, enabling students to apply oral sound analysis as they learn to decode and encode words in print.
Indicator 1d
Materials include systematic and explicit instruction in phonemic awareness with repeated teacher modeling.
Materials include systematic, explicit instruction in sounds (phonemes).
Materials provide the teacher with examples for instruction in sounds (phonemes).
Materials include teacher guidance for corrective feedback when needed for students.
The phonemic awareness instruction in Open Court Reading meets the expectations for Indicator 1d. The materials include systematic, explicit instruction in phonemic awareness through daily lessons and repeated teacher modeling. Lessons follow a consistent structure in which the teacher introduces, models, and guides students in blending, segmenting, and manipulating sounds. Materials provide clear examples and routines to support accurate teacher modeling and student practice. Teacher guidance includes explicit corrective feedback. Instruction is cumulative and structured, reinforcing phoneme-level awareness across the year and building toward student independence with foundational skills.
Note: This indicator is analyzed at the lesson level to examine the instructional progression within and across lessons. Repeated references to a single week or lesson reflect the structured sequence of explicit instruction and guided practice, which is representative of how the materials support this skill throughout the year.
Materials include systematic, explicit instruction in sounds (phonemes).
In Unit 2, Lesson 1, Day 4, Phonemic Awareness, the teacher tells students that they will listen to individual sounds and blend the sounds to make words and signals when students should respond. The lesson begins with two-sound blends. Students blend s and ē to form see. Students continue with three-sound blends. Students blend s, ē, and d to form seed. Students blend s, ē, and k to form seek. The routine continues with additional sets that follow the same explicit blending procedure. Students blend p and īto form pie. Students blend p, ī, and p to form pipe. Students blend p, ī, and l to form pile. Additional sets include blending n and ō to form no, then blending n, ō, and s to form nose, and blending n, ō, and t to form note. The final set includes blending l and ā to form lay, blending l, ā, and t to form late, and blending l, ā, and s to form lace.
In Unit 3, Lesson 2, Day 5, Phoneme Substitution, Initial Consonants, the teacher directs students to repeat a word such as fin and then substitute a new sound for the initial phoneme (e.g., /th/ for /f/ to form thin). This routine provides step-by-step oral practice in phoneme substitution.
Materials provide the teacher with examples for instruction in sounds (phonemes).
In Unit 1, Lesson 1, Day 3, Phoneme Blending, Initial Consonant Sounds, the lesson includes a scripted word list with initial sounds and word parts (e.g., /p/ + …rint =print; /d/ + …octor = doctor; /m/ + …uscle = muscle). In Phoneme Segmentation, Initial Consonant Restoration, the lesson provides scripted prompts for using student names (e.g., Susan -> usan), guiding the teacher in how to model and correct the puppet’s mistakes.
In Unit 3, Lesson 2, Day 5, Phoneme Substitution, Initial Consonants, the lesson supplies specific word lists and substitution prompts, such as fin -> thin, chin, tin, pin, and provides additional practice with shell, substituting /f/, /t/, /j/, /s/ for /sh/. These examples guide the teacher in how to present substitution tasks clearly and consistently.
Materials include teacher guidance for corrective feedback when needed for students.
In Unit 1, Lesson 1, Day 3, the teacher is directed to take care not to distort consonant sounds by stretching them and to pause between the initial sound and the ending of the word. This guidance supports the teacher in modeling accurate phoneme production and correcting student errors that may arise from distorted articulation.
In Unit 2, Lesson 1, Day 2, Phoneme Blending, Consonant Blends, a Teacher Tip provides explicit corrective feedback directions: “Provide feedback for students who need additional support with phoneme blending. Model the sound that students missed. Say the sound, have students repeat the sound, and blend the word with students again. Repeat a few words in the activity to give students additional practice.”
Indicator 1e
Materials include daily, brief lessons in phonemic awareness.
Daily phonemic awareness instruction aligns to the scope and sequence, progressing from isolation, blending, and segmenting to more advanced phoneme manipulations, with phoneme-grapheme correspondences introduced to connect sounds to letters.
Materials include opportunities for students to practice connecting sounds to letters.
Materials include directions to the teacher for demonstrating how to pronounce each phoneme (articulation/mouth formation).
The daily phonemic awareness lessons in Open Court Reading partially meet expectations for Indicator 1e. The materials provide daily, brief instruction aligned to the scope and sequence and progress from isolating, blending, and segmenting phonemes to more advanced manipulation tasks. Instruction includes explicit routines and modeling, and students have regular opportunities to connect phonemes to graphemes through Sound/Spelling Card activities. However, articulation guidance to support accurate sound production appears only occasionally in Teacher Tips and is not systematically embedded across daily lessons.
Note: This indicator is analyzed at the lesson level to examine the instructional progression within and across lessons. Repeated references to a single week or lesson reflect the structured sequence of explicit instruction and guided practice, which is representative of how the materials support this skill throughout the year.
Daily phonemic awareness instruction aligns to the scope and sequence, progressing from isolation, blending, and segmenting to more advanced phoneme manipulations, with phoneme-grapheme correspondences introduced to connect sounds to letters.
In Unit 1, Lesson 1, Day 5, Phoneme Segmentation: Final Consonant Restoration, the teacher introduces a routine in which the Lion Puppet repeats a spoken word but omits the final sound. The teacher says a word such as sandwich, the puppet repeats the word without the ending, and the teacher prompts students to supply the missing final phoneme. Students listen carefully, identify /ch/ as the sound left off, and respond orally to correct the puppet. The teacher continues the routine with additional examples, including milk → /k/, juice → /s/, lamp → /p/, and brush → /sh/. Through this modeled routine, students practice segmenting words to isolate and produce final phonemes.
In Unit 5, Lesson 2, Day 1, Phoneme Substitution: Initial Consonant Sounds, the teacher provides explicit instruction in substituting initial phonemes. The teacher says the word dent, has students repeat it, and asks what new word is formed when /s/ replaces /d/. Students respond with cent. The teacher continues the routine by prompting students to substitute additional initial sounds, such as /r/ to form rent, /t/ to form tent, and /v/ to form vent, giving students repeated practice in manipulating initial phonemes to generate new words.
In Unit 7, Lesson 3, Day 1, Phoneme Blending: Single-Syllable Words, the teacher says each word sound by sound, such as /b/ /a/ /k/, and students blend the sounds to produce back. The routine continues with additional examples, including /k/ /i/ /d/ → kid, /t/ /r/ /ē/ → tree, /s/ /t/ /a/ /n/ /d/ → stand, and /t/ /w/ /i/ /s/ /t/ → twist.
Materials include opportunities for students to practice connecting sounds to letters.
In Unit 1, Lesson 1, Day 1, the teacher provides opportunities for students to connect sounds to letters using the Sound/Spelling Cards. The teacher explains that reading involves connecting sounds to their spellings and points to the Sound/Spelling Cards to show how pictures support this connection. Using Routine 1, the teacher introduces /s/ spelled s, guiding students to identify the capital S and lowercase s on the Sausages card and noting that the black letters indicate a consonant. The teacher turns the card, identifies the picture, models the /s/ sound, and points to the letter s as the spelling for the sound heard at the beginning of sausages. Through this routine, students connect the phoneme /s/ to its corresponding letter.
In Unit 1, Lesson 1, Day 3, the teacher provides explicit opportunities for students to connect sounds to letters using Sound/Spelling Cards. The teacher reminds students that reading involves connecting sounds to spellings and reviews /s/–s and /m/–m using the picture cues on the cards. Using Routine 1, the teacher introduces /ă/ spelled a, turns to the Lamb card, and explains that the sound for the card is /ă/. Students identify the spelling a at the bottom of the card, and the teacher explains that vowels have long and short sounds and that the green band indicates the short /ă/ heard in the middle of lamb. Through this routine, students connect the vowel sound to its corresponding letter and spelling pattern.
Materials include limited directions to the teacher for demonstrating how to pronounce each phoneme (articulation/mouth formation).
In Unit 1, Lesson 3, Day 3, Teacher Tip, the materials suggest having students open their mouths and point to their tongues while saying /o/ repeatedly, offering a visual cue to support students in remembering the mouth position for the sound.
In Unit 4, Lesson 3, Day 1, Teacher Tip, the materials suggest for the /y/ sound students move their fingers like yawning mouths as they identify and say the sound, offering a visual cue to support correct pronunciation.
Articulation guidance appears only occasionally in Teacher Tips, offering limited direction for modeling accurate sound production during daily phonemic awareness and phonics instruction.
Indicator 1f
Materials regularly and systematically offer assessment opportunities that measure student progress in phonemic awareness (as indicated by the program scope and sequence).
Materials provide a variety of assessment opportunities throughout the year (e.g., at least three times per year or aligned to key instructional benchmarks) to monitor student progress in phonemic awareness. Assessment types may include oral tasks, encoding assessments, decoding activities requiring phoneme manipulation, and teacher observations.
Assessment materials provide teachers-and, when appropriate, caregivers-with clear information about students’ current skill levels in phonemic awareness.
Materials support teachers with instructional suggestions or next steps based on assessment results to support student progress toward mastery.
The assessment opportunities for phonemic awareness in Open Court Reading partially meet expectations for Indicator 1f. The materials provide regular and systematic assessment opportunities to monitor student progress in phonemic awareness across the year, including embedded weekly tasks, diagnostic assessments, and formal progress checks aligned to the scope and sequence. The teacher is supported with clear directions for administration, class and student record sheets, and performance benchmarks that define proficiency. Assessment materials provide information that helps the teacher identify student needs and determine appropriate placement or intervention. However, while the materials offer general guidance to reteach and assess skills based on results, next-step instructional support is broad and appears in assessment resources rather than being consistently embedded within daily lessons.
Note: This indicator is analyzed at the assessment level to examine how opportunities to measure phonemic awareness are structured and distributed across the year. Repeated references to specific weeks or tasks reflect embedded and recurring assessment structures that are representative of the program’s design for monitoring student progress over time.
Materials provide a variety of assessment opportunities throughout the year (e.g., at least three times per year or aligned to key instructional benchmarks) to monitor student progress in phonemic awareness. Assessment types may include oral tasks, encoding assessments, decoding activities requiring phoneme manipulation, and teacher observations.
In Unit 2, Lesson 3, Day 5, Monitor Progress, Formal Assessment, Ending Consonants, students are asked to listen to words and identify the final phoneme. The teacher gives an example, fuzz, and students fill in the bubble under the spelling for the last sound they hear.
In the Teacher Resources, Assessment, Lesson and Unit Assessment, Book 1: Blackline Masters with Answer Key, Diagnostic Assessment, Phonemic Awareness, the teacher assesses students’ ability to perform phoneme substitution through an oral task. For example, the teacher says, “The word is pit. Now change the /t/ in pit to /n/. Is the new word pine? Yes or no?” Students respond orally, and the teacher continues with additional items, (e.g., sit -> change /i/ to /e/).
Assessment materials provide teachers-and, when appropriate, caregiver-with clear information about student’s current skill levels in phonemic awareness.
In the Teacher Resources, Assessment, Lesson and Unit Assessment, Book 1: Blackline Masters with Answer Key, the Diagnostic Assessment is administered as an initial screener for individual students or small groups who may lack prerequisite skills. The teacher records results on Student and Class Assessment Records, noting assessment name, date, number possible, number correct, percentage, and score. The materials also provide performance benchmarks, for example, 80% accuracy as proficient.
In the Teacher Resources, Assessment section, the Benchmark Assessment Guide includes Benchmark Assessment Record: Test 1, which provides a class recording sheet listing each student’s name and a designated phonemic awareness category worth five points. The teacher records individual student performance in this category to identify current levels of phonemic awareness. Benchmark Assessment Record: Test 2 includes the same structure, offering a phonemic awareness category on the class sheet that allows teachers to monitor student progress and determine areas of need.
Materials support teachers with general instructional suggestions or next steps based on assessment results to support student progress toward mastery.
In the Teacher Resources, Assessment, Lesson and Unit Assessment, Book 1: Blackline Masters with Answer Key, Diagnostic Assessment, the materials direct the teacher to use the Diagnostic Assessment results to identify students’ literacy needs, make instructional placement decisions, and determine whether immediate intervention is required. The teacher is instructed to note the type of errors students make, provide additional scaffolding or intervention for those who do not meet expectations, and re-administer the assessment to monitor progress.
This evidence shows that the materials provide general next-step guidance for the teacher to analyze errors, provide intervention, and assess student progress in phonemic awareness. However, this guidance is broad and appears in assessment resources rather than being consistently embedded within daily lessons.
Criterion 1.2: Phonics (Decoding and Encoding)
This criterion is non-negotiable. Materials must achieve a specified minimum score in this criterion to advance to the next gateway.
Materials emphasize explicit, systematic instruction of research-based and/or evidence-based phonics.
The Open Court Reading materials partially meet expectations for Criterion 1.3 in Grade 1 by providing explicit, systematic instruction in research-based phonics that progresses from simple to more complex skills. Instruction follows a clearly articulated scope and sequence that prioritizes high-utility sound–spelling correspondences and introduces phonics patterns one at a time with cumulative review. Lessons include consistent teacher modeling and frequent opportunities for students to decode and encode words through blending, dictation, spelling routines, and aligned decodable texts used for multiple readings to support accuracy and automaticity. However, guidance for task-specific corrective feedback is limited, with common student errors addressed primarily through general Teacher Tips rather than embedded instructional supports. In addition, phonics assessments primarily measure decoding in isolation, and post-assessment guidance, particularly following benchmark assessments, is general and not consistently linked to specific performance patterns or targeted instructional next steps. Overall, phonics instruction is coherent and systematic, but limitations in feedback and assessment use reduce the consistency with which instruction supports targeted mastery across the year.
Indicator 1g
Scope and sequence clearly delineate an intentional sequence in which phonics skills are to be taught, with a clear evidence-based explanation for the order of the sequence.
Materials contain a clear, evidence-based explanation for the expected sequence for teaching phonics skills.
Materials provide a cohesive, intentional phonics sequence, progressing from simple to more complex skills, with ample opportunities to apply skills through decoding in connected text.
Phonics instruction is based in high utility patterns and/or specific phonics generalizations.
The phonics scope and sequence in Open Court Reading meets the expectations for Indicator 1g. The materials provide a research-based, clearly defined progression for phonics instruction. Instruction in Grade 1 builds from connecting sounds to letters toward connecting sounds to spellings using Sound/Spelling Cards, and progresses systematically from short vowels and consonants to long vowels, digraphs, variant spellings, and morphological elements. The sequence emphasizes high-utility sound-spelling correspondences and specific phonics generalizations. Students apply newly taught patterns through daily blending, decoding, and reading of aligned decodable texts, ensuring a coherent path from simple to complex that supports mastery of foundational reading skills.
Materials contain a clear, evidence-based explanation for the expected sequence for teaching phonics skills.
In the Teacher Resources, Research in Action: The Science of Reading in Open Court Reading, the materials explain that in Grade 1, instruction shifts from connecting sounds to letters to connecting sounds to spellings using the Sound/Spelling Cards. These cards include uppercase and lowercase letters, pictures that represent initial consonant and medial vowel sounds, and action associations to support learning.
The materials emphasize blending as the “heart and soul” of explicit, systematic phonics instruction, consistent with research highlighting the importance of fluent, accurate decoding for reading comprehension (Rack, Snowling, & Olson, 1992; Share & Stanovich, 1995; Adams, Treiman, & Pressley, 1997; Fletcher & Lyon, 1998; Vellutino, Scanlon, & Sipay, 1997). Phonics instruction is designed to build decoding and encoding skills by segmenting words into sounds and connecting those sounds to their spellings reflecting Moats’ (1998) findings on the importance of linking sounds to print.
Students apply newly taught sound-spelling correspondences in pre-decodable and decodable texts, which aligns with recommendations to provide ample opportunities for students to practice blending and segmenting in connected text (NICHD, 2000; Foorman et al., 1996).
Materials provide a cohesive, intentional phonics sequence that progresses from simple to more complex skills and includes ample opportunities to apply skills through decoding in connected text.
According the Scope and Sequence, phonics instruction in Grade 1 begins in Unit 1 with common consonants and short vowels and progresses across the year to long vowels, variant spellings, silent letters, diphthongs, and morphological elements (e.g., prefixes, suffixes). The sequence is supported by pre-decodable and decodable texts for students to apply newly taught patterns in connected reading. The sequence is as follows:
Unit 1
Lesson 1: /s/ spelled s; /m/ spelled m; /a/ spelled a; /t/ spelled t, tt
Lesson 2: /d/ spelled d; /n/ spelled n; /i/ spelled i; /h/ spelled h
Lesson 3: /p/ spelled p; /l/ spelled l, ll; /o/ spelled o; /b/ spelled b
Practice occurs in decodables (I Can See; Sam, Sam, Sam, Sit; Bob and Bat)
Unit 2
Lesson 1: /k/ spelled c; /aw/ spelled al, all; /k/ spelled k, ck; /r/ spelled r
Lesson 2: /f/ spelled f, ff; /s/ spelled ss; /g/ spelled g; /j/ spelled j
Lesson 3: /j/ spelled dge; /ŭ/ spelled u; /z/ spelled z, zz, s
Practice occurs in decodables (Nat’s Cap, At the Mall, Buzz and Zip)
Unit 3
Lesson 1: /ks/ spelled x; /ĕ/ spelled e; -ed endings: /ed/, /d/, /t/
Lesson 2: /ĕ/ spelled ea; /sh/ spelled sh; /th/ spelled th; /ch/ spelled ch, tch
Lesson 3: /or/ spelled or, ore; /ar/ spelled ar; /w/ spelled w, wh
Practice occurs in decodables (Beth Gets a Snack, Mitch on a Ranch, A Spark in the Dark)
Unit 4
Lesson 1: /er/ spelled er, ir, ur, ear; /ng/ spelled ng
Lesson 2: /əl/ spelled -al, -el, -il, -le; /nk/ spelled nk; /kw/ spelled qu
Lesson 3: /y/ spelled y; /v/ spelled v; /ā/ spelled a, a_e
Practice occurs in decodables (Bird Shirts, In the Tank, April’s Bake Shop)
Unit 5
Lesson 1: /ī/ spelled i, i_e; /s/ spelled ce, ci; /j/ spelled ge, gi
Lesson 2: /ō/ spelled o, o_e; /ū/ spelled u, u_e
Lesson 3: /ē/ spelled e, e_e, ee, ea
Practice occurs in decodables (A Mess, Frozen, Summer Heat)
Unit 6
Lesson 1: /ē/ spelled y, ie, ey
Lesson 2: /s/ spelled cy, s, ce, ci, cy; /ā/ spelled ai, ay
Lesson 3: /ī/ spelled igh, y, ie
Practice occurs in decodables (A Party for Puppies, Wait for Me)
Unit 7
Lesson 1: /ō/ spelled oa, ow; /ū/ spelled ew, ue
Lesson 2: /m/ spelled mb; /n/ spelled kn, gn; /r/ spelled wr; /f/ spelled ph
Lesson 3: /oo/ spelled oo, u, ue
Practice occurs in decodables (Crow and Goat, Little Wren’s Surprise, A Cool Balloon)
Unit 8
Lesson 1: /oo/ spelled ew, u_e, oo
Lesson 2: /ow/ spelled ow, ou; /aw/ spelled au, aw
Lesson 3: /aw/ spelled augh, ough; /oi/ spelled oi, oy
Practice occurs in decodables (A New Tune, Paul’s Sauce, Roy and Royal)
Unit 9
Lesson 1: Prefixes un-, dis-
Lesson 2: Prefixes im-, in-, re-
Lesson 3: /ā/ spelled a, a_e, ai, ay; /ă/ spelled a
Practice in decodables (Mr. Paws Invents, Garden in the Sky)
Unit 10
Lesson 1: Review /ī/ spellings (i, i_e, igh, ie, y)
Lesson 2: Review /ō/ spellings (o, o_e, oa, ow)
Lesson 3: Review /ū/ spellings (u, u_e, ew, ue)
Practice in decodables (Picking Flowers, Mr. Plant Expert)
Unit 11
Lesson 1: Review /ē/ spellings (e, e_e, ee, ea, y, ie)
Lesson 2: Review consonant digraphs.
Lesson 3: Review r-controlled vowels.
Practice occurs in decodables (A Family House, A Summer Home)
Unit 12
Lesson 1: Review /oo/ and /ŭ/ spellings (ew, u_e, ue, u, oo)
Lesson 2: Review /ow/, /aw/, /oi/ spellings
Lesson 3: Morphology — base words, prefixes, endings.
Practice occurs in decodables (Brave Tony, Camping Out, Andy Lee)
Phonics instruction is based on high utility patterns and/or specific phonics generalizations.
According to the Grade 1 Scope and Sequence, phonics instruction begins with high-utility consonants and short vowels (/s/, /m/, /ă/, /t/, /d/, /n/, /i/, /h/, etc.) and then systematically introduces long vowels, digraphs, and variant spellings. Multiple spellings for common sounds are explicitly taught, such as /k/ spelled c, k, ck; /j/ spelled j, dge, ge, gi; and /s/ spelled s, ss, ce, ci, cy.
Instruction includes r-controlled vowels (/ar/, /or/, /er/), vowel teams (ai, ay; ee, ea; oa, ow; ew, ue), and diphthongs (au, aw, oi, oy). Later units extend to silent letters (kn, wr, mb, gn), advanced clusters (ng, nk, ph), and morphological generalizations with prefixes (un-, dis-, re-) and inflectional endings (-s, -es, -ed, -ing, -er, -est)
This sequence shows instruction is organized around high-frequency patterns and widely applicable generalizations, progressing from the most common to more complex forms.
Indicator 1h
Materials are absent of the three-cueing system.
Materials do not contain elements of instruction that are based on the three-cueing system for teaching decoding.
The materials’ exclusion of three-cueing strategies in Open Court Reading meets expectations for Indicator 1h. Materials do not include instructional language or routines that rely on the three-cueing system. Lessons focus on explicit instruction in phoneme-grapheme correspondences and phonics-based decoding. When students encounter unfamiliar words, instruction emphasizes attention to letter-sound relationships rather than relying on context or visual cues to guess the word.
Materials do not contain elements of instruction that are based on the three-cueing system for teaching decoding.
The materials do not contain elements of instruction that are based on the three-cueing system for teaching decoding.
Indicator 1i
Materials, questions, and tasks provide reasonable pacing where phonics (decoding and encoding) skills are taught one at a time and allot time where phonics skills are practiced to automaticity, with cumulative review.
Materials include reasonable pacing of newly-taught phonics skills.
The lesson plan design allots time to include sufficient student practice to work towards automaticity.
Materials contain distributed, cumulative, and interleaved opportunities for students to practice and review all previously learned grade-level phonics.
The pacing and practice opportunities of phonics instruction in Open Court Reading meet the expectations for Indicator 1i. The materials include a clearly structured and appropriately paced sequence in which new sound-spelling correspondences are introduced one at a time through the use of Sound/Spelling Cards and explicit blending routines. Each lesson provides consistent opportunities for teacher modeling, guided decoding and encoding practice, and cumulative application in reading and writing tasks. Instructional design allocates sufficient time for students to build accuracy and automaticity through distributed, cumulative, and interleaved review across lessons and units.
Materials include reasonable pacing of newly taught phonics skills.
According to the Teacher Resources, Research in Action, Grade 1 instruction shifts from sounds and letters to sounds and spellings through the use of Sound/Spelling cards. Each card introduces one new sound and its corresponding spelling, with explicit routines for blending and connecting to print. Skills are introduced sequentially, allowing students to focus on one sound-spelling relationship at a time before moving to the next.
For example, in Unit 0, Getting Started, Day 1, students systematically review the alphabet through daily practice of vowel and consonant sounds in isolation. Lessons include identifying vowel and consonant sounds, reciting a modified alphabet song with pauses to reinforce recognition, and engaging with Sound/Spelling Cards that highlight the distinction between vowels and consonants. Each sound is practiced orally, reinforced with visual cards, and connected to print.
The pacing and structure is consistent across Grade 1, with each new sound-spelling introduced in isolation through Sound/Spelling Cards, reinforced through systematic blending and spelling routines, and applied in decodable reading and writing tasks.
The lesson plan design allots time to include sufficient student practice to work towards automaticity.
In Unit 1, Lesson 1, Day 3, Phonics and Decoding: /ă/ spelled a, students repeat /a/ in isolation while associating with the a spelling on the Sound/Spelling card, echo the sound through cumulative chant and song, and practice handwriting by tracing and writing uppercase and lowercase Aa while softly repeating the /a/ sound. Practice continues in blending routines, where students combine /ă/ with consonants (e.g., m -> am, Pam, Lamb) to decode and read words. Students then apply the word am in oral sentences to reinforce fluency and word recognition. Guided practice extends this work in Skills Practice 1, where students identify and write the spelling for /ă/ in pictures and words, trace and write letters, and complete fill-in-the-letter tasks that connect sound to print.
In Unit 11, Lesson 3, Day 1, students review the ar, or, and ir sound-spelling correspondences using Sound/Spelling Cards and blend words from word lines through Whole Word Blending and Blending Sentences routines. Practice extends to multisyllabic words through the Closed Syllable Routines, where students decode words syllable by syllable (e.g., garden, partner, winter). Students then create a class chart of r-controlled vowel words, adding examples from word lines and connected reading. Sentence-level blending further reinforces automaticity, as students expand and reread sentences containing target spellings to strengthen fluency and accuracy.
Materials contain distributed, cumulative, and intervleaved opportunities for students to practice and review all previously learned grade-level phonics.
In Unit 1, Lesson 3, Day 5, Phonics and Decoding, Unit 1 Review, students revisit multiple consonant and short-vowel sound/spellings using Sound/Spelling Cards, identifying letter-sound correspondences and distinguishing between vowels and consonants. Letter Card activities require students to listen to words and signal the correct initial consonant, reinforcing recognition across several previously introduced phonemes. Blending routines engage students in decoding words, sentences, and multisyllabic words that incorporate a mix of new and previously taught sound-spellings. Skills Practice extends review through picture-word writing tasks and sentence completion activities, requiring students to apply accumulated knowledge. Dictation routines further integrate review by having students generate spellings from oral prompts, compare their work to correct models, and correct errors.
In Unit 12, Lesson 1, Day 2, students revisit the oo spellings (/ōō/ and /oo/) using Sound/Spelling Cards and practice blending words from multiple word lines, applying both Whole-Word and Sentence Blending routines. Instruction includes decoding multisyllabic words through the Closed and Open Syllable routines, reinforcing earlier phonics concepts in connected practice. Students contribute reviewed words to a class Word Chart, building a cumulative resource over multiple lessons. Sentence-level activities and oral language prompts further interleave review by requiring students to identify, read, and apply oo pattern words in context.
Indicator 1j
Materials include systematic and explicit phonics instruction with repeated teacher modeling.
Materials contain explicit instructions for systematic and repeated teacher modeling of newly-taught phonics patterns.
Lessons include blending and segmenting practice using structured, consistent blending routines with teacher modeling.
Lessons include dictation of words and sentences using the newly-taught phonics pattern(s).
Materials include teacher guidance for corrective feedback when needed for students.
The phonics instruction in Open Court Reading partially meets the expectations for Indicator 1j. The materials provide systematic and explicit modeling of sound-spelling correspondences through structured routines. The teacher consistently models how to connect sounds to print, blend and segment words, and apply new phonics patterns in word and sentence dictation. Lessons include repeated modeling and guided practice to support accurate decoding and encoding. However, materials include only general corrective feedback prompts through brief Teacher Tips that direct the teacher to model correct sounds or spellings. Common student errors are not embedded within lessons, and task-specific feedback for in-the-moment correction is limited.
Note: This indicator is analyzed at the lesson level to examine the instructional progression within and across lessons. Repeated references to a single week or lesson reflect the structured sequence of explicit instruction and guided practice, which is representative of how the materials support this skill throughout the year.
Materials contain explicit instructions for systematic and repeated teacher modeling of newly taught phonics patterns.
In Unit 2, Lesson 2, Day 3, Phonics and Decoding /g/ spelled g, the teacher uses Routine 1, the Introducing Sounds and Spelling Routine to explicitly model /g/ spelled g. The Sound/Spelling Card Gopher is introduced, with teacher modeling of the letter name, sound, and spelling, reinforced through the Gopher story that repeatedly connects the /g/ sound to print. The teacher writes the spelling on the board and guides students to trace and say /g/ in the air, on palms, or surfaces, ensuring repeated modeling of the phonics pattern.
In Unit 8, Lesson 2, Day 1, Phonics and Decoding /ow/ spelled ow, the teacher models the spelling, connects it to Sound/Spelling Card Cow, and reinforces the pattern with the Cow story that repeatedly connects the sound /ow/ to print. Students trace and say the spelling ow multiple times in the air or on surfaces, providing repeated modeling and practice with the new phonics pattern.
Lessons include blending and segmenting practice using structured, consistent blending routines with teacher modeling.
In the Unit 2, Lesson 2, Day 3, Blending, the lesson incorporates Routine 2, the Sound-by-Sound Blending Routine, and Routine 4, the Blending Sentence Routine, to provide structured blending practice. With teacher support, students blend decodable words such as gas, gab, gap, dog, tag, grid, glad, and grass before reading full sentences (e.g., Did Peg sit in the grass? and Gill got a big dog.).
In Unit 3, Lesson 1, Day 1, Dictation and Spelling, materials include blending and segmenting practice using structured, consistent routines with teacher modeling. The teacher uses Routine 7, the Sounds-in-Sequence Dictation Routine, Routine 8, the Whole-Word Dictation Routine, and Routine 9, the Sentence Dictation Routine. The teacher dictates each word, uses it in a sentence, and repeats it. Students repeat the word, segment the sounds, and identify the corresponding spellings using the Sound/Spelling Cards. The teacher models each sound-spelling connection by pointing to and naming the card and reminds students to apply their knowledge of sound-spelling correspondences as they write.
During sentence dictation, students apply newly taught phonics patterns in connected text. The teacher prompts students to recall the different types of sentences and use appropriate end punctuation, reinforcing encoding, comprehension, and writing conventions within a single structured routine. Example words include six, sag, fix, and fuzz, and the sentence is Can Max fix the drum?
Lessons include dictation of words and sentences using the newly taught phonics pattern(s).
In Unit 1, Lesson 2, Day 2, Dictation and Spelling, materials direct the teacher to use Routine 6, Word Building Routine, for dictation and spelling. Students use Letter Cards (a, d, m, n, s, t) to build dictated words step by step, with explicit teacher guidance to segment sounds, reference the Sound/Spelling Cards, and place the correct letters in sequence. Dictation includes words such as an, ant, tan, mats, man, and, sand, stand, allowing students to apply the target phonics pattern in both simple and expanded word forms. Students proofread by comparing against the teacher model, correcting errors, and rewriting words as needed.
In Unit 9, Lesson 3, Day 3, Dictation and Spelling, the teacher uses Routine 8, the Whole-Word Dictation Routine, and Routine 9, the Sentence Dictation Routine, to provide explicit, systematic instruction and practice in encoding. The teacher says each word, uses it in a sentence, and repeats it. Students repeat the word, segment each sound, and write the word while referencing the Sound/Spelling Cards. The teacher guides students to proofread each line and correct misspelled words by circling and rewriting them above or beside the original word.
Sentence dictation extends this structured practice to connected text. The teacher dictates one word at a time, prompting students to attend to capitalization and end punctuation. Example words include bat, same, wait, play, take, back, plant, and gain, with the challenge word railway. The sentence for dictation is You may take the cape to the man in the rain. After writing, students proofread and correct their spelling, capitalization, and punctuation.
Materials include general teacher guidance for corrective feedback when needed for students.
In Unit 1, Lesson 2, Day 2, Corrective Feedback, for dictation, the teacher is prompted to say, “That word doesn’t look quite right. Let’s spell the word again,” and then model the correct spelling by pointing to the Sound/Spelling Card and having students adjust their Letter Cards accordingly. Students are guided to circle errors and rewrite the corrected spelling. This corrective feedback provides general guidance on correcting spelling errors broadly, rather than providing task-specific guidance tied to the particular phonics skill being taught.
In Unit 9, Lesson 1, Day 2, Phonics and Decoding: Prefixes un- and dis-, materials provide explicit teacher guidance for corrective feedback when students struggle with blending or applying sound-spelling correspondences. The teacher is directed to model the mispronounced sound, point to the corresponding letter, and have students repeat the sound. The Sound-by-Sound Blending Routine is then used to reblend the word with students for reinforcement. This corrective feedback provides general guidance that can be applied to a range of blending or sound-spelling errors and does not provide task-specific feedback tailored to the prefix skill being taught.
Materials provide only general guidance for corrective feedback. Common student errors are not consistently embedded within lesson routines, and teacher support for in-the-moment feedback is limited to brief side notes rather than explicit, task-specific guidance within the instructional steps.
Indicator 1k
Materials include frequent practice opportunities for students to decode and encode words that consist of common and newly-taught sound and spelling patterns.
Lessons provide students with regular opportunities to decode words with taught phonics patterns.
Lessons provide students with regular opportunities to encode words with taught phonics patterns.
Student-guided practice and independent practice of blending sounds using the sound-spelling pattern(s) are varied and frequent, supporting skill retention and automaticity.
Materials provide opportunities for students to engage in word-level decoding practice focused on accuracy and automaticity.
The decoding and encoding practice opportunities in Open Court Reading meet expectations for Indicator 1k. The materials include frequent and varied opportunities for students to decode and encode words using common and newly taught sound-spelling patterns. Daily phonics lessons integrate explicit teacher modeling with structured routines that provide repeated decoding practice at both the word and sentence level. Encoding is reinforced through Sounds-in-Sequence, Whole-Word, and Sentence Dictation routines that guide students to segment, spell, proofread, and correct words using taught phonics patterns. Lessons provide cumulative blending and rereading practice that emphasize accuracy and automaticity, supporting students’ fluency and independent application of phonics skills in connected text.
Note: This indicator is analyzed at the lesson level to examine the instructional progression within and across lessons. Repeated references to a single week or lesson reflect the structured sequence of explicit instruction and guided practice, which is representative of how the materials support this skill throughout the year.
Lessons provide students with regular opportunities to decode words with taught phonics patterns.
In Unit 1, Lesson 3, Day 3, Blending, students use Routine 2, Sound-by-Sound Blending and Routine 4, Blending Sentences to decode words with short o spelled o. The teacher displays the word, guides students to identify each phoneme, and models how to blend the sounds to read the word (for example, pot, tot, dot, hot, plop, stop, plot, spot, hop, hip, top, tip). Students practice reading each blended word aloud and rereading for accuracy and natural pacing. After word-level blending, students apply the same pattern in connected text by blending and rereading the sentences “Tom has a map. The pot is hot.”
In Unit 11, Lesson 2, Day 1, Blending, students apply previously learned and newly introduced digraph spellings to decode words using Routine 3, Whole-Word Blending and Routine 4, Blending Sentences. The teacher displays the Sound/Spelling Cards for sh, sl, ch, ng, and sk, reminding students that in each case, two consonants work together to represent one sound. Students practice decoding and rereading words from the word lines (king, long, gong, song, shake, ship, wishbone, shadow) and apply their learning to read sentences such as “Chad will ride on a ship to go whale watching.” Students blend and reread each word or sentence until they can read it fluently and automatically, providing multiple decoding opportunities with common and newly-taught consonant digraphs.
Lessons provide students with regular opportunities to encode words with taught phonics patterns.
In Unit 1, Lesson 3, Day 3, Dictation and Spelling, students use Routine 7, Sounds-in-Sequence Dictation and Routine 8, Whole-Word Dictation to encode words with the taught short o pattern (not, dot, hop, lot). The teacher dictates each word, provides a sentence for context, and guides students to segment the word by sound, referencing the Sound/Spelling Cards before writing. Students reread their words, circle any misspellings, and rewrite them correctly. These tasks provide structured, repeated opportunities for students to apply sound-spelling knowledge to spelling and writing. Additional encoding practice occurs in Guided Practice on Skills Practice 1, as students write o and O multiple times while saying the /o/ sound, and identify pictures containing the /o/ sound before writing the spelling beneath each one.
In Unit 6, Lesson 1, Day 1, Dictation and Spelling, students apply the Word Building Routine 6 to encode words with the taught long e sound spelled y (leaf, leafy, lazy, hazy, copy, point, breezy, easy). The teacher dictates each word, prompting students to spell the word aloud, write it, and proofread their work for accuracy before proceeding to the next word. Students circle any misspelled words and rewrite them correctly.
Student-guided practice and independent practice of blending sounds using the sound-spelling pattern(s) is varied and frequent.
In Unit 6, Lesson 1, Day 1, Blending, students participate in multiple blending formats that vary in structure and level of support. Using Sound-by-Sound Blending, students blend phonemes in words with y at the end of the syllables. Whole-Word Blending and Sentence Blending extend practice to connected text, allowing students to reread sentences for fluency. The teacher incorporates both open and closed syllable routines to help students blend multisyllabic words (for example, happy, pony, jellybean), providing cumulative blending practice that supports students in independently decoding and reading words containing the new sound-spelling pattern.
In Unit 11, Lesson 2, Day 1, Blending, students engage in structured and varied blending practice through Whole-Word blending, Blending Sentences, and Closed Syllables Routines. Students blend single-syllable words containing digraphs (e.g., ship, shake, gong, song) and apply Routine 10, Closed Syllable to blend multisyllabic words such as wishbone and shadow. This variety of blending formats and syllable structures provides repeated, scaffolded opportunities for students to practice blending using the same sound-spelling patterns within words and in connected text.
Materials provide opportunities for students to engage in word-level decoding practice focused on accuracy and automaticity.
In Unit 1, Lesson 3, Day 3, Blending and High-Frequency Word Introduction, students reread the blending words and sentences multiple times to achieve fluency and automatic recognition. The lesson provides explicit guidance for the teacher to “not wait for all students to gain mastery of each sound before going on,” emphasizing that automaticity develops through repeated practice and review. Students blend and reread words containing the short o spelling and high-frequency words such as has until they can read them accurately and automatically.
In Unit 11, Lesson 2, Day 1, Blending, students practice decoding words and sentences until they can read them “fluently and automatically.” Teacher guidance directs the use of Whole-Word Blending to support fluency with previously taught digraphs and the application of syllabication routines for accuracy in multisyllabic words. Students reread word lines and sentences (for example, “Meg said, ‘I think most children wish they could whistle”) to ensure accurate pronunciation and smooth, expressive reading.
Indicator 1l
Spelling rules and generalizations are taught one at a time at a reasonable pace. Spelling words and generalizations are practiced to automaticity.
Spelling rules and generalizations are aligned to the phonics scope and sequence.
Materials include explanations for spelling of specific words or spelling rules.
Students have sufficient opportunities to practice spelling rules and generalizations.
The instruction and practice of spelling rules and generalizations in Open Court Reading meet expectations for Indicator 1l. Spelling instruction progresses systematically and aligns with the phonics scope and sequence, introducing one sound-spelling rule or generalization at a time and pacing new learning in a logical progression from phonetic to structural and meaning patterns. Materials include explicit explanations of spelling rules and connect them directly to weekly word lists and dictation routines. Students engage in consistent, structured opportunities to apply and practice spelling rules through modeled instruction, guided dictation, and proofreading. Routine-based activities provide distributed practice, allowing students to build accuracy and automaticity over time. Differentiated guidance extends encoding practice through partner dictation and extension tasks, reinforcing spelling generalizations across multiple contexts.
Spelling rules and generalizations are aligned to the phonics scope and sequence.
According to the Program Overview, the spelling lessons are organized around specific spelling patterns that progress from phonetic to structural and meaning patterns in a logical sequence. Each week’s word list is derived from the Phonics and Fluency or Word Analysis skills taught in the Foundational Skills portion of each lesson, ensuring that students learn spelling patterns directly connected to their phonics instruction. The overview explains that early lessons emphasize sound-pattern strategies such as pronunciation, consonant substitution, vowel substitution, and rhyming-word strategies. Later lessons introduce structural patterns (e.g., adding -s or -es to form plurals, dropping the final e before -ed or -ing) and meaning patterns (e.g., using prefixes, suffixes, and base words).
In Unit 3, Lesson 1, Day 1, spelling instruction for the /ks/ sound spelled x aligns to the phonics scope and sequence, which designates /ks/ spelled x as the new sound-spelling for this lesson.
In Unit 2, Lesson 2, Day 1, spelling words such as fin, fan, fat, fast, fist, and fit align to the phonics scope and sequence, which designates /f/ spelled f and ff as the focus sound-spellings for this lesson.
Materials include explanations for spelling of specific words or spelling rules.
In Unit 4, Lesson 1, Day 1, Introduce the Sound/Spelling and Dictation and Spelling, the teacher explicitly explains the spelling rule for the /er/ sound. Using Routine 1, Introducing Sounds and Spellings, the teacher displays the Bird Sound/Spelling Card and states that it represents “the /er/ sound - er and ir - and explains that these letters spell a “special vowel sound.” Students are prompted to identify the color-coding on the card (red letters, blue background) to reinforce that the pattern represents a vowel sound. The Teacher Tip: Introducing Sounds and Spellings advises the teacher to cover the ur spelling until the next lesson, ensuring that only one generalization is introduced at a time. During dictation, the teacher further explains that “with multiple spellings for a sound, it is especially important that students ask, ‘Which spelling?’ when they are unsure about which spelling to use.”
In Unit 5, Lesson 2, Day 1, Introduce the Sound/Spelling and Dictation and Spelling, the teacher provides an explicit explanation of the long-vowel spelling rule for /ō/ spelled o and o_e. Using Routine 1, Introducing Sounds and Spellings, the teacher displays the Long o Sound/Spelling Card and explains that a vowel’s long sound is its letter name. The teacher points out that “all long vowels have several spellings” and uses a self-sticking note to cover all but o and o_e to focus on these two patterns. Students are told that the blank in o_e means a consonant comes between the o and e. The teacher then contrasts short o and long o using the Sound/Spelling Cards for Fox (/ŏ/) and Long O (/ō/), and models the difference with the rhyme:
“O’s my name.
Two sounds I know:
Short o in stop,
Long o in go.”
This explanation clarifies the difference between the short o and long o sounds, and then introduces o and o_e as two common spellings that represent the long o sound.
Students have sufficient opportunities to practice spelling rules and generalizations.
In Unit 6, Lesson 2, Day 1, Dictation and Spelling, students engage in multiple structured opportunities to practice spelling words and generalizations through dictation, proofreading, and extension activities. Using Routine 8, Whole-Word Dictation and Routine 9, Sentence Dictation, students spell target words (center, cinder, safe, nice) and the sentence “Stacy saved the kitten from the icy pond.” Students check their work by comparing to the model on the board, circling and correcting errors as needed. Differentiated Instruction provides additional practice through partner dictation and sentence generation with words containing the /s/ sound.
In Unit 7, Lesson 3, Day 1, Dictation and Spelling, students engage in structured encoding practice using the Word Building Structure Routine to spell words with the target, /ōō/ pattern (boo, boot, both, too, tooth, toot, root, roof, room). Students build each word sound by sound, check their spelling, and correct errors by circling and rewriting misspelled words before moving to the next word. The Teacher Tip: Word Chart further extends practice by having students continuously add /ōō/ words to a class or individual chart, reinforcing the rule through repeated exposure and application.
Indicator 1m
Materials include decodable texts with phonics aligned to the program’s scope and sequence and opportunities for students to use decodables for multiple readings.
Decodable texts reflect grade-level phonics patterns aligned to the program's scope and sequence.
Lessons include detailed plans for repeated readings of decodable texts to reinforce accuracy, automaticity, and confidence.
Reading practice occurs in decodable texts aligned to the taught phonics patterns and reflects absence of predictable texts. Use of decodable texts decreases over time as students demonstrate decoding proficiency and transition into increasingly complex texts.
The decodable texts and instructional routines in Open Court Reading meet the expectations for Indicator 1m. Decodable texts align to the program’s phonics scope and sequence and reflect taught phonics patterns across the year. Lessons provide structured routines for repeated readings, including teacher modeling, guided practice, and partner and choral rereading, supporting accuracy, automaticity, and confidence. Reading practice occurs in decodable texts that maintain consistent phonics control and avoid predictable sentence patterns. Students read decodables multiple times per instructional week through Unit 8, offering frequent opportunities to apply phonics skills in connected text. Beginning in Unit 9, the frequency of decodable texts decreases as students transition into increasingly complex texts while continuing to reinforce decoding in fluency routines.
Note: This indicator is analyzed at the lesson level to examine the instructional progression within and across lessons. Repeated references to a single week or lesson reflect the structured sequence of explicit instruction and guided practice, which is representative of how the materials support this skill throughout the year.
Decodable texts reflect grade-level phonics patterns aligned to the program’s scope and sequence.
In Unit 1, Lesson 2, Day 1, Fluency, Reading a Decodable Book, students read Core Decodable 9, Dad Sat to apply previously taught short-vowel and consonant patterns in connected text. The day’s focus includes reviewing high-frequency words and reading the story to reinforce decoding accuracy and automaticity. The Sound-Spelling Correspondence for the lesson emphasizes /d/ spelled d, consistent with the phonics sequence introduced in prior lessons. Students apply taught sound-spelling correspondence and high-frequency words within the context of a short, controlled decodable story that aligns to the program’s phonics scope and sequence, noting that reading practice directly reinforces phonics instruction.
In Unit 12, Lesson 3, Day 4, Fluency, Reading a Decodable Book, students read Core Decodable 114, Andy Lee to apply advanced phonics skills, including multisyllabic word decoding and review of previously taught sound-spelling correspondences. The Sound-Spelling Correspondences in the Core Decodables chart shows a cumulative sequence through the decodable, progressing from short vowels and consonant patterns to complex vowel teams, r-controlled vowels, digraphs, diphthongs, and inflectional endings. Students also review high-frequency words before reading, noting that both phonics and word recognition components are practiced in context.
Lessons include detailed plans for repeated readings of decodable texts to reinforce accuracy, automaticity, and confidence.
In Unit 1, Lesson 2, Day 1, Fluency, Reading a Decodable Book, Core Decodable 9, Dad Sat, lesson guidance directs the teacher to implement Routine 5, Reading a Decodable, a structured, multi-step reading routine that provides repeated reading opportunities. Students preview the story, read silently, and take turns reading aloud by page. The teacher models decoding and comprehension monitoring by demonstrating how to stop, blend, reread, and confirm word understanding. Students reread the story through partner reading and choral reading to build fluency and confidence. Additional practice opportunities include Practice Decodable 9, Tad, which reinforces the same phonics patterns, /d/ spelled d, through extended reading.
In Unit 12, Lesson 3, Day 4, Fluency, Reading a Decodable Book, Core Decodable 114, Andy Lee, the teacher implements Routine 5, Reading a Decodable, which provides detailed steps for multiple readings. Students preview the story, make predictions, and read each page silently and aloud. The teacher models decoding strategies for multisyllabic words, explicitly demonstrating how to decode syllable by syllable, reread for understanding, and reread sentences several times until fluent. Students engage in rereading through partner and choral reading, while comprehension questions and retelling tasks provide additional rereading opportunities for accuracy and fluency. The materials reinforce the importance of repeated reading by reminding the teacher to encourage students to reread stories to make their reading “sound more natural.” Students requiring additional practice read Practice Decodable 91, How the Rabbit Caught the Tiger, which reinforces the same phonics features through extended reading and fluency activities.
Reading practice occurs in decodable texts aligned to the taught phonics patterns and reflects an absence of predictable texts. Use of decodable texts decreases over time as students demonstrate decoding proficiency and transition into increasingly complex texts.
In Unit 1, Lesson 2, Day 1, Fluency, Reading a Decodable Book, reading practice occurs in Core Decodable 9, Dad Sat and Practice Decodable 9, Tad, which feature controlled vocabulary aligned to the taught phonics pattern and include high-frequency words introduced in prior lessons. Differentiated guidance provides additional support for approaching-level students through echo reading, ensuring all students engage in connected text practice.
In Unit 12, Lesson 3, Day 4, Fluency, Reading a Decodable Book, reading practice in Core Decodable 114, Andy Lee integrates multisyllabic words and varied sentence structures, reflecting the culmination of the phonics sequence and the application of advanced decoding strategies. The decodable text maintains strong alignment to taught phonics patterns and includes comprehension routines that require students to locate evidence in the text, retell the story.
In the Unit 1 Knowledge Strand, students engage with the realistic fiction text “First Grade Stinks!” to build comprehension and vocabulary through listening and discussion. By Unit 12, students read from the Student Anthology, Set the Stage!, which includes grade-level selections that expand background knowledge, vocabulary, and text complexity. This design demonstrates that while decodable reading continues for fluency and automaticity, students concurrently transition into knowledge-rich, complex texts that promote broader literacy development.
Across Units 1-8, students engage with decodable readers multiple times per instructional week, providing frequent practice with connected text. Beginning in Unit 9, the program shifts to using one decodable per instructional week, reducing the number of opportunities for students to apply taught phonics patterns in decodable texts as instruction progresses.
Indicator 1n
Materials regularly and systematically offer assessment opportunities that measure student progress of phonics in- and out-of-context (as indicated by the program scope and sequence).
Materials regularly and systematically provide a variety of assessment opportunities over the course of the year to demonstrate students’ progress toward mastery and independence in phonics.
Assessment materials provide teachers and students with information concerning students’ current skills/level of understanding of phonics.
Materials support teachers with instructional suggestions for assessment-based steps to help students to progress toward mastery in phonics.
The phonics assessment opportunities in Open Court Reading partially meet expectations for Indicator 1m. Materials provide regular and systematic assessments throughout the year, including informal checks, lesson and unit assessments, and benchmark assessments that measure progress in key phonics components. The materials also include tools for recording performance and tracking student growth across strands. However, most phonics assessments measure decoding in isolation rather than within connected text. While lesson and unit assessments provide targeted phonics-based recommendations, benchmark guidance remains general and does not connect specific performance results to specific reteach or intervention lessons. As a result, the teacher must determine the appropriate next instructional steps independently when interpreting benchmark data, limiting the usefulness of assessment information for targeted phonics instruction.
Materials regularly and systematically provide a variety of assessment opportunities over the course of the year to demonstrate students’ progress toward mastery and independence in phonics.
In Unit 3, Lesson 3, Day 4, Monitor Progress, Informal Assessment, students engage in digital eActivities and eGames to review and demonstrate phonics skills taught in the lesson. The activity directs students to drag red markers to sound boxes to hear the phonemes represented by each letter, click the play button to hear the blended word, and then click the speaker button to confirm accuracy before advancing. Students practice blending and reading the word lead and then listen to answer choices (shack, tenth, chop, pitch, torn) to select the word that matches the blended sounds. This is considered an out of context assessment.
According to the Benchmark Assessment Guide, the Benchmark Assessments occur three times per year - after Unit 2 (Week 6), Unit 6 (Week 18), and Unit 12 (Week 34). Each assessment uses a 100-Point Skills Battery sampling skills across eight strands including Phonics, Decoding, and Spelling. For example in Test 1, the Phonics strand includes teacher-administered one-on-one items such as identifying or spelling words (Which of these is the word race? The word is ship). The Decoding strand requires students to read printed words aloud (open, lady, music, poem, maybe, happen, pencil, kitten, ribbon, bottom) and the Spelling strand measures students’ ability to encode words out of context (start, net, same, dog, tire). This is considered an out of context assessment.
Assessment materials provide teachers and students with information concerning students’ current skills/level of understanding of phonics.
According to the Benchmark Assessment Guide, the materials include Benchmark Assessment Records and Benchmark Tracking Charts for the teacher to document and monitor student scores for each strand, including Phonics, Decoding and Spelling. The teacher records total 100-point scores and notes whether students meet or fall below cutoff levels. Strand-level results identify specific areas of strength or weakness in decoding accuracy and phonics pattern recognition. The teacher is instructed to store assessment pages in a student binder and transfer the data to tracking charts, which visualize performance and growth over time, allowing for quick identification of trends and instructional needs.
According to the Assessment Handbook, observation is embedded into daily routines as an ongoing informal assessment strategy. The teacher is directed to observe students as they complete regular classwork or engage in reading and foundational skills practice, taking informal notes on decoding accuracy, fluency, and comprehension behaviors. The handbook advises the teacher to observe specific aspects of student performance during each lesson and record these observations systematically, ensuring that every student is observed over a four- to five-day cycle.
Materials support teachers with some instructional suggestions for assessment-based steps to help students to progress toward mastery in phonics.
In Unit 4, Lesson 1, Day 5, Phonics Assessment Recommendations, the teacher is directed to use the Post-Assessment Foundational Skills Recommendations when students score below 79 percent on a lesson assessment. The guidance provides structured reteaching routines and intervention support to reinforce skills with /er/ spelled er, ir, ur, and ear, and /ng/ spelled ng. The teacher reviews Sound/Spelling Cards 35 (Gong) and 39 (Bird), prompting students to identify the picture, sound, and associated spellings. Students listen to and classify words by sound (e.g., fur - /er/, zing - /ng/, heard - /er/, ping - /ng/), circle the spelling representing the sound, and repeat it aloud.
The lesson extends practice through blending activities using Whole-Word Blending and Closed Syllable routines, where students read and reread words (rang, hung, ping, curl, stirred, learning) and blend decodable sentences such as “The singer’s song rang out far and long.” Students also complete follow-up Intervention Support practice pages, which include unscrambling, spelling, and word-picture matching activities to reinforce decoding and spelling accuracy.
According to the Assessment Handbook, Lesson Assessments and Benchmark Assessments include diagnostic information intended to inform next-step instruction. The teacher is directed to use Reteach Lessons for students approaching level, the Intervention Teacher’s Guide for those needing more intensive phonics support, and the English Learner Teacher’s Guide for language-based scaffolds. Lesson and unit assessments often include more specific phonics-based recommendations tied directly to the content assessed. However, guidance following benchmark assessments is more general and does not map specific performance results to particular reteach or intervention lessons, requiring the teacher to determine next instructional steps independently.
Criterion 1.3: Word Recognition and Word Analysis
Materials and instruction support students in learning and practicing regularly and irregularly spelled words.
The Open Court Reading materials partially meet expectations for Criterion 1.4 in Grade 1 by providing systematic instruction and practice to support high-frequency word recognition, with limited and inconsistently applied word analysis. Materials include a consistent routine for introducing and reviewing approximately 120 high-frequency words, with cumulative exposure through isolated practice and connected text that supports decoding accuracy and automaticity. Students also engage in some encoding of high-frequency words through dictated word- and sentence-level tasks. However, instruction provides limited explicit modeling that identifies the regularly spelled and temporarily irregularly spelled parts of high-frequency words, and lessons emphasize reading and use in context rather than analysis of sound–spelling relationships. Materials include some explicit instruction in syllabication and morpheme analysis, including work with syllable types and common prefixes, but opportunities to apply these strategies during decoding are intermittent and not systematically reinforced across the year. Assessments regularly measure word recognition accuracy and fluency, but guidance for using assessment results to inform targeted, task-specific instructional next steps is general, and formal assessment of word analysis does not begin until Grade 2. Overall, materials support high-frequency word recognition and practice but provide uneven instruction, application, and assessment of broader word analysis skills.
Indicator 1o
Materials include explicit instruction in identifying the regularly spelled part and the temporarily irregularly spelled part of words. High-frequency word instruction includes spiraling review.
Materials include systematic and explicit instruction of high-frequency words with an explicit and consistent instructional routine.
Materials include teacher modeling of the spelling and reading of high-frequency words that includes connecting the phonemes to the graphemes.
Materials include a sufficient quantity of high-frequency words for students to make reading progress.
The high-frequency word instruction in Open Court Reading partially meets expectations for Indicator 1o. Materials provide a consistent routine for introducing and reviewing high-frequency words, and students practice reading these words in isolation and in connected text across the year. Grade 1 introduces approximately 120 high-frequency words, offering sufficient quantity and cumulative review to support reading progress. However, lessons include limited explicit modeling that connects phonemes to graphemes or analyzes regularly and irregularly spelled word parts. Teacher modeling focuses on reading and using high-frequency words in context rather than examining their sound–spelling relationships, resulting in minimal support for developing deeper orthographic understanding of high-frequency words.
Materials include systematic and explicit instruction of high-frequency words with an explicit and consistent instructional routine.
In Unit 1, Lesson 1, Day 2, the teacher uses Routine 14, the High-Frequency Words Routine, to introduce the words can and on. The teacher writes each word on the board, reads it aloud, and uses it in a sentence before students repeat and generate their own sentences. Each word is added to the High-Frequency Word Bank, and the teacher reviews previously introduced words by pointing to them and having students read them aloud.
In Unit 9, Lesson 2, Day 4, the teacher reviews previously introduced high-frequency words from Unit 1-8, such as a, before, can, see, water, etc. by pointing to each in the High-Frequency Word Bank and having students read them aloud. The lesson then applies these words within Core Decodable 105, Gram and the Kids using Routine 5, the Reading and Decodable Routine. The teacher reminds students that reading the story provides practice with high-frequency words in connected text and models how to stop, blend, and reread for accuracy and fluency.
Materials include limited teacher modeling of the spelling and reading of high-frequency words that includes connecting the phonemes to the graphemes.
In Unit 2, Lesson 2, Day 2, High-Frequency Words, the materials direct the teacher reviews the high-frequency words was and what by pointing to them in the word bank, reading them aloud, and prompting students to repeat and use them in sentences. Students locate the words in the decodable text and practice reading them for automaticity; however, the lesson does not include explicit modeling that connects phonemes to graphemes or identifies the irregular vowel patterns in was or what.
In Unit 3, Lesson 1, Day 2, High-Frequency Words, the materials direct the teacher to review the words down, its, and red by reading them from the word bank, using them in sentences, and having students locate them in the decodable. Students practice reading the words for automaticity; however, the lesson does not include explicit modeling that connects phonemes to graphemes or identifies the regular or irregular spellings within these words.
Across lessons, teacher modeling focuses on reading and using high-frequency words in connected text, with limited explicit instruction connecting phonemes to graphemes or identifying irregularly spelled word parts.
Materials include a sufficient quantity of high-frequency words for students to make reading progress.
Grade 1 materials introduce approximately 120 high-frequency words across eleven units with instruction designed to support both isolated word recognition and fluent application in connected text.
High-Frequency word instruction appears consistently across units, beginning with,
Unit 1: can, on, arm, and, did, it, had, him, said, in, has, at
Unit 2: call, look, was, what, got, big, all, if, to, get, ask, of, as, he, his, just
Unit 3: down, its, red, help, six, then, this, that, jump, for, out, little, went, will, when, are
Unit 4: girl, her, with, any, from, like, water, but, do, long, my, no, where, an, they, she, yes, were
Unit 5: ride, walk, we, well, make, them, you, go, after, over, or, two, be, green, take
Unit 6: every, come, going, me, too, here, pretty, some, could, day, way, sleep, don’t, came, right
Unit 7: their, away, how, know, want, one, now, saw, old, would, blue
Unit 8: very, good, brown, about, around, by, into, boy, before, yellow
Unit 9: your
Unit 10: five
Unit 11: four, put
Indicator 1p
Instructional opportunities are frequently built into the materials for students to practice and gain decoding automaticity of high-frequency words.
Students practice decoding high-frequency words in isolation.
Lessons provide students with frequent opportunities to decode high-frequency words in context.
Lessons provide students with frequent opportunities to encode high-frequency words in tasks, such as sentences, in order to promote automaticity of high-frequency words.
The instructional opportunities for high-frequency words in Open Court Reading meet expectations for Indicator 1p. Materials provide regular opportunities for students to decode high-frequency words in isolation and in connected text through consistent routines and repeated reading of decodable texts. Lessons also include explicit opportunities for students to encode high-frequency words through dictated word and sentence-level writing tasks. Together, these routines support the development of accuracy and automaticity through both decoding and encoding of high-frequency words.
Note: This indicator is analyzed at the lesson level to examine the instructional progression within and across lessons. Repeated references to a single week or lesson reflect the structured sequence of explicit instruction and guided practice, which is representative of how the materials support this skill throughout the year.
Students practice decoding high-frequency words in isolation.
In Unit 1, Lesson 2, Day 2, the teacher begins by reviewing previously introduced high-frequency words from the class Word Bank. The teacher points to each word (for example, a, am, and, can, have, I, is, on, see, the, there, up) and prompts students to read them aloud in isolation before reading the decodable text. Students chorally repeat each word several times, reinforcing accuracy and visual recognition. This inclusion of the cumulative Word Bank routine provides consistent opportunities across lessons for students to practice decoding and reading known high-frequency words independently and fluently.
In Unit 3, Lesson 1, Day 2, the teacher reviews previously introduced high-frequency words down, its, and red by pointing to them in the High-Frequency Word Bank and having students read them aloud in isolation. Volunteers use each word in oral sentences, reinforcing pronunciation and meaning before reading connected text. Students are prompted to look through the upcoming story to identify additional familiar high-frequency words and practice reading them aloud “until they can read them automatically and fluently.”
Lessons provide students with frequent opportunities to decode high-frequency words in context.
In Unit 1, Lesson 2, Day 2, students apply decoding of high-frequency words during the reading of Core Decodable 10, Ants. Using Routine 5, the Reading a Decodable Routine, students read and reread pages of connected text containing previously introduced high-frequency words (a, am, and, can, have, I, is, on, see, the, there, up). The teacher facilitates multiple exposures through silent reading, individual reading, and choral rereading. Partner echo reading and fluency practice provide repeated decoding opportunities that promote automaticity with high-frequency words in context.
In Unit 3, Lesson 1, Day 2, the students apply decoding of down, its, and red during the reading of Core Decodable 35, A Red Fox. The teacher uses Routine 5, the Reading a Decodable Routine, to guide reading and rereading of the text. Students read pages silently, aloud individually, and chorally, with prompts to check accuracy and reread for understanding. Partner rereading and fluency practice further reinforce automatic recognition of high-frequency words within meaningful sentences such as, “A red fox has a den. A red fox hunts. It sits down.”
Lessons provide students with opportunities to encode high-frequency words in tasks, such as sentences, in order to promote automaticity of high-frequency words.
In Unit 3, Lesson 1, Day 2, students encode the high-frequency word can through dictated writing using Routine 8, the Whole-Word Dictation Routine. The teacher first says the word can, uses it in a sentence, and repeats the word. Students then say the word and write the spelling as the teacher dictates each sound. After writing the word, students proofread their spelling as the teacher displays the correct spelling on the board.
In Unit 4, Lesson 2, Day 3, during Dictation and Spelling instruction, students encode high-frequency words within sentence-level writing using Routine 9, the Sentence Dictation Routine. The teacher dictates a sentence that includes the high-frequency words is, in, his, and this. Students write the sentence, applying their knowledge of sound-spelling correspondences and referencing Sound/Spelling Cards as needed. The teacher explicitly identifies is, in, his, and this as high-frequency words and directs students to write the words automatically rather than sounding them out. After writing, students proofread their sentences as the teacher displays the correct spelling and make corrections as needed.
Indicator 1q
Materials include explicit instruction in syllabication and morpheme analysis and provide students with practice opportunities to apply learning.
Materials contain explicit instruction of syllable types and syllable division that promote decoding and encoding of words.
Materials contain explicit instruction in morpheme analysis to decode unfamiliar words.
Multiple and varied opportunities are provided over the course of the year for students to learn, practice, and apply word analysis strategies.
The instructional opportunities for syllabication and morpheme analysis in Open Court Reading partially meet expectations for Indicator 1q. Materials provide some explicit instruction in syllable types, syllable division, and common prefixes across the year, and students apply these strategies through blending and multisyllabic decoding routines in several units. However, morpheme analysis is not consistently reinforced, as later lessons review affixes without requiring students to apply them during decoding. Opportunities to learn and practice word-analysis strategies appear intermittently rather than systematically, resulting in uneven support for developing these skills over time.
Note: This indicator is analyzed at the lesson level to examine the instructional progression within and across lessons. Repeated references to a single week or lesson reflect the structured sequence of explicit instruction and guided practice, which is representative of how the materials support this skill throughout the year.
Materials contain explicit instruction of syllable types and syllable division that promote decoding and encoding of words.
In Unit 4, Lesson 1, Day 1, materials provide explicit instruction in syllabication through Routine 10, the Closed Syllables Routine. The teacher models how to identify closed syllables and applies syllable division to multisyllabic words such as sister, winter, under, summer, and order. Students practice blending these words syllable by syllable, using the provided syllable breaks (e.g., sis–ter, win–ter, un–der) to support accurate decoding and pronunciation. Instruction clearly connects closed-syllable patterns to vowel sounds and word reading, giving students structured opportunities to apply syllable-division strategies during decoding.
In Unit 12, Lesson 3, Day 2, Phonics and Decoding: Word Building - Base Words, Prefixes, and Endings, the teacher uses the Closed Syllables Routine and Open Syllables Routine to model and guide blending of multisyllabic words. The lesson provides clear syllable divisions (hard-er, hard-est, hard-ness, cha-ses, cha-sing, loud-er, loud-est, a-loud) and connects these patterns to decoding and pronunciation. Instruction reinforces that syllable division supports fluent reading of longer words and promotes understanding of how syllable structure influences vowel sounds.
Materials contain some explicit instruction in morpheme analysis to decode unfamiliar words.
In Unit 4, Lesson 1, Day 1, materials include explicit instruction in morpheme analysis as students decode multisyllabic words containing the prefixes un- and dis-. Using blending and syllabication routines, the teacher models how the prefix combines with the base word and guides students in segmenting and reading prefixed words such as unpack, uneven, and disagree. This routine-based blending supports students in recognizing common prefixes as meaningful units that assist with decoding unfamiliar words. However, morpheme instruction in this lesson is limited to two prefixes and is embedded within general blending routines rather than taught as a broader decoding strategy, providing restricted opportunities for students to apply morpheme analysis beyond the specific prefixed words in the lesson.
In Unit 12, Lesson 3, Day 2, the teacher reviews the meanings of common prefixes and suffixes (un-, dis-, -ness, -er, -est) and prompts students to recall that these morphemes change the meaning of base words. Students then reread and read word lines and sentences using Whole-Word Blending, Blending Sentences, and syllabication routines. The decoding practice focuses on blending and syllable-by-syllable reading of multisyllabic words such as harder, hardness, and aloud, with students applying vowel patterns and syllable division to read each word accurately. However, the lesson does not model or provide practice in using prefixes or suffixes as meaningful units to decode unfamiliar words; morphemes are reviewed for meaning, but students are not taught or prompted to apply morpheme analysis during decoding.
Materials include some explicit instruction in morpheme analysis, as students receive direct modeling of how prefixes combine with base words to support decoding. In later lessons, morphemes are reviewed for meaning, but decoding practice does not require students to apply morpheme analysis. Opportunities to use morphemes as a decoding strategy are present but not consistently reinforced.
Multiple and varied opportunities over the course of the year for students to learn, practice, and apply word analysis strategies.
In Unit 4, Lesson 1, Day 1, materials provide opportunities for students to learn and apply word analysis strategies through decoding multisyllabic words containing prefixes and through explicit syllabication routines. The teacher models how prefixes combine with base words during blending, and students practice reading prefixed words using sound-by-sound blending, whole-word blending, and closed syllable routines. Students also apply syllable division to multisyllabic words during guided blending. These routines give students structured practice using both morphemic units and syllable patterns to support word reading.
In Unit 12, Lesson 3, Day 2, Phonics and Decoding: Word Building - Base Words, Prefixes, and Endings, students apply their knowledge of prefixes, suffixes, and syllable patterns through oral reading, blending routines, and sentence-level application. For example, students reread decodable sentences, reword questions as statements, and use target words in new sentences to demonstrate understanding. The routines combine decoding, word structure analysis, and oral language use, providing multiple modes of practice. Across the year, these review lessons systematically reinforce earlier morphemic and syllabication instruction through repeated blending, analysis, and fluency practice.
Indicator 1r
Materials regularly and systematically offer assessment opportunities that measure student progress of word recognition and analysis (as indicated by the program scope and sequence).
Materials regularly and systematically provide a variety of assessment opportunities over the course of the year to demonstrate students’ progress toward mastery and independence of word recognition and analysis.
Assessment materials provide the teacher and students with information concerning students’ current skills/level of understanding of word recognition and word analysis.
Materials support the teacher with instructional suggestions for assessment-based steps to help students to progress toward mastery in word recognition and word analysis.
The assessment opportunities for word recognition and analysis in Open Court Reading partially meet expectations for Indicator 1r. Materials provide regular assessment opportunities to monitor student progress in word recognition through Benchmark, Lesson, and Unit Assessments focused on high-frequency word reading, with defined performance expectations and recording tools that allow teachers to track accuracy and reading behaviors over time. However, assessment-based instructional guidance is general rather than task-specific or systematic. While materials offer broad suggestions for responding to assessment results, they do not provide explicit decision-making pathways or clearly defined instructional steps tied to specific assessment outcomes. In addition, formal assessments of word analysis do not begin until Grade 2, limiting the extent to which Grade 1 materials assess or support progress in word analysis aligned to the scope and sequence.
Note: This indicator is analyzed at the assessment level to understand how opportunities to measure word recognition and analysis are structured and distributed across the year. Repeated references to weekly assessments and recurring routines reflect embedded, cumulative structures that are representative of the program’s approach to monitoring student progress and supporting responsive instruction over time.
Materials regularly and systematically provide some assessment opportunities over the course of the year to demonstrate students’ progress toward mastery and independence of word recognition and analysis.
According to the Benchmark Assessment Guide, High-Frequency Word Reading Benchmark Assessments are administered three times during the year, following Week 6 (Benchmark 1), Week 18 (Benchmark 2), and Week 34 (Benchmark 3). Each benchmark requires students to read an increasingly complex list of high-frequency words aloud, such as about, five, me, too, how, big, here, put, where, jump, don’t, long, them, just, sleep, green, over, well, any, get, around, good, one, water, and know, while the teacher records accuracy, self-corrections, and error patterns.
According to the Lesson and Unit Assessment, TE, Book 1: Blackline Masters with Answer Key, Lesson and Unit Assessments also provide ongoing measures of word recognition throughout the year. For example:
In Unit 1, Lesson 1 High-Frequency Word Assessment requires students to identify target words through item-based tasks (for example, distinguishing can from visually similar options such as san and cin).
In Unit 9, Lesson 2, students select words based on meaning related to prefixes (for example, identifying impossible to mean “not possible” or rewrite to mean “write again”), providing further opportunities to assess recognition of high-frequency and morphologically complex words.
In addition, Diagnostic Assessments are available for students entering after the start of the year to determine their current level of high-frequency word recognition and identify whether immediate intervention is needed.
According to the Assessment Handbook Manual, the materials state, “depending on the grade level, tested benchmark skills include the following: Word Analysis (Grades 2-5). Therefore formal Word Analysis Benchmarks begin in Grade 2.
Assessment materials provide the teacher and students with information concerning students’ current skills/level of understanding of word recognition and word analysis.
According to the Benchmark Assessment Guide, High-Frequency Word Reading Benchmark Assessments direct the teacher to circle words read incorrectly, note student strengths and weaknesses, document error types, and record when students self-correct while reading aloud. These recording forms allow teachers to capture detailed information about student accuracy and reading behaviors during word recognition tasks.
According to the Lesson and Unit Assessment, TE, Book 1: Blackline Masters with Answer Key, in Unit 1, Lesson 1 High-Frequency Word Assessment requires students to identify correct target words, and results are recorded on a Unit 1 Class Assessment Record, allowing the teacher to track student accuracy across high-frequency word assessments.
Materials support the teacher with some instructional suggestions for assessment-based steps to help students progress toward mastery in word recognition and word analysis.
According to the Lesson and Unit Assessment, TE, Book 1: Blackline Masters with Answer Key, High-Frequency Word assessment materials include defined performance expectations and guidance to support instructional decision-making. Assessments are based on five- or ten-word sets, with acceptable performance levels specified, including 4 out of 5 correct for five-word assessments, 4 out of 6 when an automaticity rating is included, and 8 out of 10 correct for ten-word assessments. Materials encourage repeated administration of these assessments until students can read the words accurately and automatically.
Assessment guidance also supports the teacher in examining student performance at the word level. Materials describe common patterns of performance and suggest instructional responses, such as providing additional practice with highly decodable words when students misread regular sound-spellings, focusing on less decodable high-frequency words when students demonstrate strong phonics skills but inconsistent word recognition, and using paired reading to support students who read slowly, hesitate, or frequently self-correct.
These suggestions provide general guidance for responding to assessment results related to accuracy and automaticity in word recognition.
Criterion 1.4: Reading Fluency Development
Materials provide systematic and explicit instruction and practice in oral reading fluency by mid-to-late 1st and 2nd grade. Materials for 2nd grade oral reading fluency practice should vary (e.g., decodables and grade-level texts). Instruction and practice support students’ development of accuracy, rate, and prosody to build fluent, meaningful reading.
The Open Court Reading materials partially meet expectations for Criterion 1.5 by providing systematic, explicit instruction and practice to support oral reading fluency in Grade 1. Materials include regular teacher modeling of fluent reading and structured routines such as repeated readings, echo and choral reading, and partner rereading using grade-level decodable connected text. Beginning in mid-Grade 1, students engage in varied and frequent supported practice designed to build accuracy, rate, and prosody as decoding skills become secure. Materials also include regular unit and benchmark fluency assessments that measure accuracy, rate, and expression and provide teachers with tools to track student progress over time. However, while assessment data are clearly collected, guidance for using results to inform targeted, task-specific instructional adjustments is general rather than explicit. Overall, materials support the development and monitoring of oral reading fluency, but provide limited instructional direction for responding to identified fluency needs.
Indicator 1s
Instructional opportunities are built into the materials for systematic, evidence-based, explicit instruction in oral reading fluency.
Materials include regular and varied opportunities for explicit, systematic instruction in rate, accuracy, and prosody using grade-level connected text (e.g., decodable texts, poetry, readers’ theater, paired reading).
Materials provide opportunities for students to hear fluent reading of grade-level text by a model reader.
Materials include a variety of resources for explicit instruction in oral reading fluency, supporting skill development across the year.
The instructional opportunities for oral reading fluency in Open Court Reading meet the expectations for Indicator 1s. Materials provide regular and varied opportunities for explicit, systematic fluency instruction using grade-level decodable connected text. Across units, lessons consistently follow structured routines that include teacher modeling, guided practice, repeated readings, and partner reading to build accuracy, rate, and prosody. Students hear fluent reading in every decodable lesson, with the teacher modeling appropriate phrasing, expression, and pacing before students engage in echo, choral, and independent rereading. Fluency practice is supported through multiple routines, high-frequency word review, decodable rereading, and supplemental practice decodables, offering consistent and coherent fluency instruction across the year.
Note: This indicator is analyzed at the lesson level to examine the instructional progression within and across lessons. Repeated references to a single week or lesson reflect the structured sequence of explicit instruction and guided practice, which is representative of how the materials support this skill throughout the year.
Materials include regular and varied opportunities for explicit, systematic instruction in rate, accuracy, and prosody using grade-level decodable connected text.
In Unit 1, Lesson 1, Day 2, Fluency: Reading a Pre-Decodable, materials include systematic fluency instruction using Core Pre-Decodable 5: I Can See. The lesson follows explicit routines to build accuracy and rate through repeated reading of connected decodable text. Students first read along as the teacher models fluent reading, then chorally reread with teacher support, and finally read independently and with partners, alternating pages. Practice continues as students reread the same text multiple times, supporting automaticity and developing fluency with familiar high-frequency words.
In Unit 2, Lesson 3, Day 2, Fluency: Reading a Decodable Book, materials include explicit fluency instruction using Core Decodable 30: Plum Pond. Students engage in repeated readings of connected decodable text that reinforces targeted phonics patterns and high-frequency words. Using Routine 5: Reading a Decodable, the teacher guides students through silent reading, individual oral reading, and choral rereading to strengthen accuracy and rate. Students are prompted to blend and reread unfamiliar words, check comprehension through context, and reread the entire sentence for natural phrasing.
Materials provide opportunities for students to hear fluent reading of grade-level text by a model reader.
In Unit 2, Lesson 3, Day 2, Fluency: Reading a Decodable Book, the teacher models fluent reading of Core Decodable 30: Plum Pond to demonstrate appropriate rate, phrasing, and expression while tracking print under each word. The text integrates previously taught sound-spelling correspondences—including /ŭ/ spelled u, /g/ spelled g, /j/ spelled j or dge, and review of /s/, /m/, /ă/, /t/, and /p/—alongside high-frequency words such as all, am, can, did, got, has, him, in, is, it, see, and the. The teacher reads the story aloud first while modeling accuracy and phrasing, then guides students through repeated readings using echo and choral responses. As the teacher models fluent decoding and natural intonation with familiar words and patterns, students hear and observe how accurate word recognition supports meaning-making and prosody.
In Unit 3, Lesson 2, Day 2, Fluency: Reading a Decodable Book, the teacher models fluent reading of Core Decodable 40: Trish’s Ship using varied expression and intonation to demonstrate natural phrasing and pacing. The lesson explicitly instructs the teacher to “use your voice to show expression and intonation, which are essential to fluency and support comprehension.” As the teacher reads aloud while tracking print, students observe accurate pronunciation and prosodic variation tied to punctuation and meaning. The text’s phonics focus on /sh/ and related vowel patterns, along with high-frequency word repetition, provides a controlled context for modeling smooth, expressive reading. Students then echo-read and chorally reread the text, allowing them to imitate the modeled fluent reading.
Materials include a variety of resources for explicit instruction in oral reading fluency, supporting skill development across the year.
In Unit 1, Lesson 1, Day 2, Fluency: Reading a Pre-Decodable, the lesson incorporates multiple fluency-building routines and resources, including Routine 1A: High-Frequency Words Routine and Reading the Pre-Decodable guidance, as well as Differentiated Instruction recommendations. Students review high-frequency words before reading, practice decoding and rereading decodable text, and engage in partner reading to reinforce fluency. Additional practice is provided through Practice Pre-Decodable 5: See the Bike. Materials also include small-group supports for students who need additional practice.
In Unit 3, Lesson 2, Day 2, Fluency: Reading a Decodable Book, fluency instruction in this lesson incorporates multiple routines and resources, including Routine 5: Reading a Decodable, High-Frequency Word Bank review, Partner Reading, and Choral Reading. Students engage in repeated oral reading and comprehension discussion, then reread the text twice with a partner to practice phrasing, expression, and accuracy. Additional opportunities for fluency development are provided through Practice Decodable 34: A Flash, which reinforces the /sh/ sound in new connected text. Comprehension checks and “Teacher Tip” guidance ensure that students focus on reading the text itself rather than relying on pictures, reinforcing accurate word recognition and fluency. Across lessons and units, these routines provide consistent, explicit fluency practice that supports skill development throughout the year.
Indicator 1t
Varied and frequent opportunities are built into the materials for students to engage in supported practice to gain automaticity and prosody beginning in mid-Grade 1 and through Grade 2 (once accuracy is secure).
Varied, frequent opportunities are provided over the course of the year for students to gain automaticity and prosody in connected text, aligned to program expectations and developmental readiness.
Materials provide practice opportunities for oral reading fluency in a variety of settings (e.g., repeated readings, dyad or partner reading, continuous reading), with sufficient frequency to support progress towards mastery.
Materials include teacher-facing guidance on modeling fluent reading and delivering corrective feedback that supports students’ growth in rate, expression, and phrasing.
The instructional opportunities for supported fluency practice in Open Court Reading meet the expectations for Indicator 1t. Materials provide varied and frequent opportunities for students to develop automaticity and prosody beginning in mid-Grade 1, including repeated readings of connected decodable texts with structured teacher modeling and guided practice. Lessons consistently integrate echo reading, partner rereading, and multiple reread cycles aligned to Routine 5, with explicit prompts for attending to phrasing, expression, and natural pacing. Students apply fluency skills across units through systematic rereading routines, supported practice with practice decodables, and opportunities to monitor accuracy and expression. Teacher-facing guidance provides clear steps for modeling fluent reading, observing student performance, and delivering corrective feedback, ensuring sustained and developmentally appropriate fluency instruction throughout the year.
Note: This indicator is analyzed at the lesson level to examine the instructional progression within and across lessons. Repeated references to a single week or lesson reflect the structured sequence of explicit instruction and guided practice, which is representative of how the materials support this skill throughout the year.
Varied, frequent opportunities are provided over the course of the year for students to gain automaticity and prosody in connected text, aligned to program expectations and developmental readiness.
In Unit 6, Lesson 1, Day 2, Fluency: Reading a Decodable Book, materials include systematic fluency instruction using Core Decodable 73: A Party for Puppies. Students engage in supported, repeated reading of connected decodable text that includes newly introduced and previously taught high-frequency words such as every, after, look, make, said, and what. Using Routine 5: Reading a Decodable, the lesson builds upon prior fluency routines by introducing echo reading to strengthen expressive reading and automaticity. Students first listen to the teacher model fluent reading, then reread the same passage with the same phrasing and tone, developing both accuracy and prosody through repeated practice.
In Unit 7, Lesson 1, Day 4, Fluency: Reading a Decodable Book, materials provide structured fluency instruction using Core Decodable 83: Rescue That Cat! Students engage in supported and repeated reading of connected decodable text that includes previously introduced high-frequency words (e.g., look, said, come, could, there, where, you) and new sound-spelling correspondences such as /ū/ spelled ew and ue. Using Routine 5: Reading a Decodable, the teacher explains that echo reading will help students “read expressively and smoothly.” Students follow along as the teacher reads aloud with modeled expression and then echo read the same passage, focusing on matching tone, phrasing, and rate. The repeated and supported reading opportunities build automaticity and prosody in developmentally appropriate, decodable text.
Materials offer opportunities for students to practice fluency with multiple types of texts, including poetry, nonfiction, and other connected selections, within the Knowledge Strand.
Materials provide practice opportunities for word reading fluency in a variety of settings (e.g., repeated readings, dyad or partner reading, continuous reading), with sufficient frequency to support progress towards mastery.
In Unit 7, Lesson 1, Day 4, Fluency: Reading a Decodable Book, fluency instruction, the lesson includes multiple practice formats that promote mastery. Students engage in echo reading as a whole group, followed by partner rereading, alternating pages of Core Decodable 83 to apply expression, phrasing, and rate in connected text. The teacher is directed to have students reread the story twice to reinforce automaticity and fluency. Additional practice occurs through Practice Decodable 66: Eva to the Rescue, which extends the phonics and fluency focus (/ū/ spelled ew, ue) in new but related text.
In Unit 12, Lesson 1, Day 4, Fluency: Reading a Decodable Book, fluency practice in this lesson includes partner rereading of Core Decodable 112, where students alternate pages and reread the text “several times” to develop rate, accuracy, and expression. The teacher reinforces that “the more they reread stories, the more natural their reading will sound,” promoting self-monitoring of fluency. Students are reminded to use the context of the story to check word meaning and reread challenging words and sentences until fluent. For additional practice, students read Practice Decodable 89: James and the Books, extending the same skills and fluency focus into new connected text.
Materials include teacher-facing guidance on modeling fluent reading and delivering corrective feedback that supports students’ growth in rate, expression, and phrasing.
In Unit 6, Lesson 1, Day 2, Fluency: Reading a Decodable Book, Core Decodable 73, A Party for Puppies, the fluency section directs the teacher to explain that “echo reading is repeating a passage after it has been read aloud” and that it “helps students read expressively and smoothly.” The teacher is instructed to read a page aloud first “with expression, emphasizing fun, for example, and letting your voice drop at the end of the sentence,” then reread the page and have students echo the modeled reading “using the same expression and tone.” The teacher is further guided to “observe students and check their reading for accuracy, appropriate rate, and proper expression,” providing feedback as students reread with partners. This explicit, step-by-step modeling and monitoring guidance ensures the teacher knows how to demonstrate fluent reading, scaffold student imitation, and deliver corrective feedback that develops accuracy, rate, and prosody.
In Unit 12, Lesson 1, Day 4, Fluency: Reading a Decodable Book, Core Decodable 112, Brave Tony, the teacher is instructed to “model this process as you read the story,” demonstrating how to decode multisyllabic words, reread them in context, and reread sentences “until they can be read accurately and automatically.” This explicit modeling shows students how rereading supports fluency, comprehension, and natural phrasing. The teacher is also prompted to remind students that “the more they reread stories, the more natural their reading will sound,” reinforcing the importance of repeated, expressive practice. The accompanying Teacher Tip: Fluency directs the teacher to “observe students as they read to check for accuracy, appropriate rate, and proper expression.”
Indicator 1u
Materials regularly and systematically offer assessment opportunities that measure student progress in oral reading fluency (as indicated by the program scope and sequence).
Multiple assessment opportunities are provided regularly and systematically over the course of the year for students to demonstrate progress toward mastery and independence of oral reading fluency.
Assessment materials provide the teacher–and, when appropriate, caregivers–with information about students’ current skills/levels in rate, accuracy, and prosody.
Materials support the teacher with instructional adjustments to help students make progress toward mastery and include guidance aligned to developmentally appropriate fluency benchmarks (e.g., WCPM, prosody rubrics, or progress-monitoring targets).
The assessment materials for oral reading fluency in Open Court Reading partially meet the expectations for Indicator 1u. Materials include regular and systematic opportunities to measure fluency through unit-based Oral Fluency Assessments and three Benchmark Assessments that evaluate High-Frequency Word Reading, Passage Reading, Words Correct per Minute (WCPM), and prosody. Benchmarks provide defined performance expectations across the year, and the teacher receives both quantitative and qualitative data, including accuracy, error patterns, and prosody indicators, to monitor student progress. However, guidance for instructional adjustments based on assessment results is limited. While the materials recommend rereading familiar texts, adjusting text difficulty, or increasing progress monitoring, they do not offer specific instructional moves for the teacher to model, prompt, or reteach fluency skills. As a result, assessments provide clear data on student fluency, but the materials offer minimal actionable support to help the teacher to use that data to strengthen students’ accuracy, rate, and prosody.
Multiple assessment opportunities are provided regularly and systematically over the course of the year for students to demonstrate progress toward mastery and independence of oral reading fluency.
According to the Assessment Handbook, Grade 1 materials include multiple, recurring opportunities to assess oral reading fluency through both formal and informal measures. Formal Oral Fluency Assessments are administered systematically by unit and include High-Frequency Word Reading and Passage Reading components that measure Words Correct per Minute (WCPM) and prosody. In addition to these scheduled assessments, the teacher is encouraged to conduct informal fluency checks during partner reading, Workshop, and other instructional contexts by having students read selections from Decodable Stories or the Student Anthology aloud to demonstrate progress in accuracy and automaticity.
According to the Benchmark Assessment Guide, Grade 1 materials include a comprehensive oral reading fluency assessment system administered three times per year, after Units 2, 6, and 12, to monitor progress across the full year. Each benchmark includes two measures: High-Frequency Word Reading, which assesses automatic word recognition, and Passage Reading, which assesses accuracy and fluency in connected text. Both measures use a consistent one-minute timed format, and teachers record words correct per minute and error patterns to evaluate students’ developing fluency. The assessments are cumulative rather than unit-specific, allowing teachers to monitor growth toward year-end fluency expectations.
Assessment materials provide the teacher and students with information about students’ current skills/level of understanding of oral reading fluency.
According to the Assessment Handbook, the Oral Reading Fluency: Student Record provides both quantitative and qualitative data for the teacher. In addition to recording words correct per minute, the record includes a prosody checklist that evaluates qualitative aspects of fluent reading such as pace, phrasing, expression, and intonation. The Assessment Handbook specifies that the end-of-year expectation is for students to demonstrate four out of five prosody elements at the average level. The teacher is guided to note recurring reading challenges (e.g., decoding errors or mispronunciations) and to monitor students’ ability to self-correct and sustain oral reading. These data points provide the teacher with ongoing insight into each student’s current fluency level and inform decisions about instructional pacing, grouping, and support.
According to the Benchmark Assessment Guide, the High-Frequency Word Reading and Passage Reading components provide both quantitative and qualitative data about students’ fluency. The teacher records Words Correct per Minute (WCPM) and track accuracy rates, as well as error types (e.g., substitutions, omissions, or reversals). The Oral Reading Fluency: Student Record also includes a Reading Prosody Checklist assessing decoding ability, pace, syntax, self-correction, and intonation, rated on a scale of low, average, or high. The teacher uses this checklist to evaluate expressive reading and phrasing, complementing the WCPM data. Clear scoring directions are provided for both tasks, and the teacher is encouraged to note patterns in student errors and self-corrections, providing detailed insight into decoding, automaticity, and expressive reading growth.
WCPM benchmarks are defined for each unit, beginning with 59 WCPM in Unit 7and progressing to 91 WCPM by Unit 12, ensuring ongoing measurement of fluency growth across the year.
Materials support the teacher with limited instructional adjustments to help students make progress toward mastery in oral reading fluency.
According to the Assessment Handbook, the materials include detailed guidance for instructional response and progress monitoring. The teacher is directed to provide additional practice for students who struggle by “dropping back two Decodable Stories” until the student can read accurately and fluently, then gradually advancing through more complex texts. Materials recommend that students who continue to experience difficulty receive weekly progress monitoring using Oral Fluency Assessments. The teacher is also supported in using performance data to tailor instruction through decoding practice, repeated readings, and small-group fluency intervention. The handbook emphasizes that such progress monitoring has been shown to improve instructional alignment and student outcomes.
According to the Benchmark Assessment Handbook, the Benchmark Record helps the teacher identify students who are at risk for fluency difficulties and recommends weekly progress monitoring for those students, continuing for the remainder of the year even if scores improve above the cut point. Materials advise the teacher to adjust instruction through targeted supports such as repeated readings, decoding reinforcement, and differentiated fluency instruction during Workshop.
The materials present rereading or switching texts as the primary response to student needs, but they do not provide actionable instructional moves for the teacher. Guidance does not specify what the teacher should model, prompt, or reteach in order to adjust instruction based on students’ fluency challenges.