2026
Open Court Reading

K-2nd Grade - Gateway 1

Back to K-2nd Grade Overview
Cover for Open Court Reading
Note on review tool versions

See the series overview page to confirm the review tool version used to create this report.

Loading navigation...

Gateway Ratings Summary

Alignment to Research-Based Practices

Alignment to Research-Based Practices and Standards for Foundational Skills Instruction
Gateway 1 (Second Grade) - Partially Meets Expectations
83%
Criterion 1.1: Phonics (Decoding and Encoding)
28 / 32
Criterion 1.2: Word Recognition and Word Analysis
9 / 12
Criterion 1.3: Reading Fluency Development
10 / 12

The Open Court Reading materials partially meet expectations for Gateway 1 in Grade 2 by providing a coherent, research-based approach to foundational reading skills, with strengths in phonics instruction and reading fluency development. Materials include a clearly articulated phonics scope and sequence that progresses from simple to complex decoding and encoding skills, with frequent opportunities for students to apply learning through blending, spelling, dictation, and aligned decodable texts. Instruction also includes systematic routines for high-frequency word recognition and explicit instruction in syllabication and morpheme analysis beginning midyear, supporting students’ work with multisyllabic words. Oral reading fluency instruction meets expectations through consistent teacher modeling, repeated readings, and structured practice using connected text, alongside regular fluency assessments. However, limitations remain in the depth of word analysis for high-frequency words, task-specific corrective feedback during phonics instruction, and the use of assessment data to guide targeted instructional next steps. Overall, the materials provide a strong instructional foundation for Grade 2 readers, with some gaps in feedback specificity and assessment-driven instructional support.

Criterion 1.1: Phonics (Decoding and Encoding)

28 / 32

This criterion is non-negotiable. Materials must achieve a specified minimum score in this criterion to advance to the next gateway.

Materials emphasize explicit, systematic instruction of research-based and/or evidence-based phonics.

The Open Court Reading materials partially meet expectations for Criterion 1.3 in Grade 2 by providing explicit, systematic phonics instruction that progresses from simple to increasingly complex decoding and encoding skills.Materials follow a clearly articulated, research-based scope and sequence that extends foundational phonics instruction to include closed syllables, long vowels, vowel teams, multisyllabic decoding, and spelling generalizations, with cumulative review and frequent opportunities for students to apply skills through blending, dictation, spelling, and aligned decodable texts used for multiple readings. Instruction consistently introduces new phonics skills one at a time and allows sufficient practice to build accuracy and automaticity. However, guidance for task-specific corrective feedback is limited, with common student errors addressed primarily through general Teacher Tips rather than embedded instructional supports. In addition, while assessments occur regularly, most measure decoding in isolation, and benchmark assessment guidance is broad rather than clearly linked to specific performance patterns or instructional next steps. Overall, phonics instruction in Grade 2 is coherent and systematic, but limitations in feedback and assessment use reduce the consistency of targeted instructional support across the year.

Indicator 1g

4 / 4

Scope and sequence clearly delineate an intentional sequence in which phonics skills are to be taught, with a clear evidence-based explanation for the order of the sequence.

  • Materials contain a clear, evidence-based explanation for the expected sequence for teaching phonics skills.

  • Materials provide a cohesive, intentional phonics sequence, progressing from simple to more complex skills, with ample opportunities to apply skills through decoding in connected text. 

  • Phonics instruction is based in high utility patterns and/or specific phonics generalizations.

The phonics scope and sequence in Open Court Reading meets the expectations for Indicator 1g. The materials provide a research-based, clearly defined progression for phonics instruction that reinforces and extends skills introduced in earlier grades. Instruction systematically moves from consonant digraphs and closed syllables to long vowels, vowel teams, diphthongs, and complex spelling patterns, with explicit connections to morphology and syllable structure. The sequence emphasizes high-utility sound-spelling correspondences and specific phonics generalizations. Students apply newly taught skills through blending, decoding, and reading of aligned decodable stories, ensuring a coherent progression from simple to complex that supports mastery of foundational reading skills. 

  • Materials contain a clear, evidence-based explanation for the expected sequence for teaching phonics skills. 

    • In the Teacher Resources, Research in Action: The Science of Reading in Open Court Reading, the materials explain that while phonics instruction begins systematically in Kindergarten and Grade 1, it is reinforced and extended in Grade 2 to support students as they encounter more complex orthographic patterns. This explanation is supported by research cited in the materials (e.g., NICHD, 2000; Adams, 1990; Nagy & Anderson, 1984), which recommend introducing phonics in early grades, using systematic sequences of sound-spelling correspondences, and extending instruction to include morphological and syllable-level structure as students advance. 

      • The program emphasizes that some children may require continued review, so explicit phonics instruction is intentionally revisited in Grade 2 before progressing to advanced patterns. 

      • Instruction builds from single-syllable words toward multisyllabic word decoding and encoding, incorporating syllable types, inflectional endings, and affixes, while continuing to rely on blending routines as the foundation for fluent decoding. 

  • Materials provide a cohesive, intentional phonics sequence that progresses from simple to more complex skills and includes ample opportunities to apply skills through decoding in connected text. 

    • According to the Grade 2 Scope and Sequence, instruction moves from consonant digraphs and closed syllables to long vowels, r-controlled vowels, vowel teams, diphthongs, and complex spelling patterns. Each set of skills is practiced through decodable stories to support application in connected text. The sequence is as follows:

      • Unit 1

        • /ch/, /th/, /sh/, /wh/, /ar/; closed syllables; /j/ spelled dge; /k/ spelled ck; /ch/ spelled tch

        • Inflectional endings: -s, -es, -ed, -ing

        • Decodable Stories, Book 2: Chips, The Red Star, A Bridge, A Lunch List, No Drinks in Class, Paddle Duck Paddle, Learning to Swim, Farm Chores, Tracks a Pond

      • Unit 2

        • Long vowels: /ā/ spelled a, a_e; /ī/ spelled i, i_e; /ō/ spelled o, o_e; /ū/ spelled u, u_e

        • Comparative and superlative endings: -er, -est

        • Long /ē/: e, e_e, ee, ea

        • Homographs and homophones introduced 

        • Decodable Stories, Book 3: Kate’s Picnic, Five Gifts for Mike, The Mole Zone, Hope’s Cute Music Box, A Good Life at the Lake, Uncle Jack, Edith and Pete, Amazing Animals, A Good Deed at the Beach, Be a Wrangler

      • Unit 3

        • Long /ā/ spelled a, a_e, ai_, ay; long /ē/ spelled e, ee, ee, ea, ie, y, ey

        • Additional patterns: /f/ spelled ph, /m/ spelled mb, silent letters 

        • Soft /c/ (ce, ci, cy) and soft /g/ (ge, gi)

        • Long /ī/ spelled igh, y, i, i_e

        • Decodable Stories, Book 4: Hit the Trail, Granddaddy Spider, Meet the Bats, Just a Phase for Phil, A Force in the Dirt, Uncle Green, Meet the Firefighters, Try My Pie, A Green Leaf Print

      • Unit 4

        • Long /ō/ spelled oa, ow, o, o_e; long /ū/ spelled ew, ue, u, u_e

        • /oo/ (short and long) contrasts, schwa variations

        • Decodable Stories, Book 5: The Boat Show, A Stroll on Mule Street, The Kitten’s Rescue, Under the Moon, Drew’s True Lesson, Sue, Joan, and Mud

      • Unit 5

        • /oo/ spelled oo; /ow/ spelled ow, ou; /aw/ spelled aw, au, augh, ough, all, al: /oi/ spelled oi, oy

        • Decodable Stories, Book 6: Look How Pets Adapt, Mr. Brown Sees the World, A Plant That Acts Like an Animal, The Lion and the Mouse, How Roy Got a Toy Drum, Brave After All 

      • Unit 6

        • Complex spelling: ough patterns, silent letters

        • Contrast of vowels: /oo/ vs. /ū/, /aw/ vs. /ow, /ō/ vs. /ow/

        • Decodable Stories, Book 7: Little Havana in Miami, Little India in Chicago, Little Italy in New York, Chinatown in San Francisco, Polish Communities in Detroit, The Seminole Tribe in South Florida

  • Phonics instruction is based on high utility patterns and/or specific phonics generalizations. 

    • According to the Grade 2 scope and sequence, phonics instruction is organized around high-utility patterns and common phonics generalizations that progress from simpler to more complex skills across six units. Early lessons introduce and review frequently occurring consonant digraphs (/ch/, /th/, /sh/, /wh/) and r-controlled vowels (/ar/, /er/, /ir/, /ur/). Students are taught widely used spelling conventions such as closed syllables, inflectional endings (-s, -es, -ed), and consonant generalizations including /j/ spelled dge and /k/ spelled ck. Instruction also addresses high-frequency vowel patterns, including long vowels spelled with open syllables and silent-e (a_e, i_e, o_e, u_e), along with additional long-vowel spellings (ee, ea, ai, ay, igh, ie, y, ey).

      • Across the year, instruction emphasizes common orthographic generalizations such as the spellings for /ng/ and /nk/, schwa spellings (-el, -le, -al, -il), multiple spellings for /s/ (ce, ci, cy) and /j/ (ge, gi), and high-utility variant vowel teams for /ō/, /ū/, /oo/, /ow/, /aw/, and /oi/. Later units introduce frequently encountered spelling conventions such as silent letters (kn, wr, mb, gn), the ough pattern, and productive morphological patterns including prefixes (dis-, un-, non-, re-, pre-, mis-) and suffix families (-er, -or, -ness, -ly, -y, -able, -ment).

      This sequence demonstrates a cohesive progression that prioritizes broadly applicable phonics patterns and generalizations, supporting students in applying these patterns to decoding and encoding throughout the year.

Indicator 1h

4 / 4

Materials are absent of the three-cueing system.

  • Materials do not contain elements of instruction that are based on the three-cueing system for teaching decoding.

The materials’ exclusion of three-cueing strategies in Open Court Reading meets expectations for Indicator 1h. Materials do not include instructional language or routines that rely on the three-cueing system. Lessons focus on explicit instruction in phoneme-grapheme correspondences and phonics-based decoding. When students encounter unfamiliar words, instruction emphasizes attention to letter-sound relationships rather than relying on context or visual cues to guess the word. 

  • Materials do not contain elements of instruction that are based on the three-cueing system for teaching decoding. 

    • The materials do not contain elements of instruction that are based on the three-cueing system for teaching decoding.

Indicator 1i

4 / 4

Materials, questions, and tasks provide reasonable pacing where phonics (decoding and encoding) skills are taught one at a time and allot time where phonics skills are practiced to automaticity, with cumulative review.

  • Materials include reasonable pacing of newly-taught phonics skills. 

  • The lesson plan design allots time to include sufficient student practice to work towards automaticity. 

  • Materials contain distributed, cumulative, and interleaved opportunities for students to practice and review all previously learned grade-level phonics.

The pacing and practice opportunities of phonics instruction in Open Court Reading meet the expectations for Indicator 1i. The materials include a clearly structured and systematic sequence in which new sound-spelling correspondences are introduced one at a time through explicit instruction, blending routines, and dictation practice. Lessons progress from review of single-syllable patterns to more complex spelling generalizations, inflectional endings, and multisyllabic decoding, allowing students to build mastery before advancing to new skills. Each lesson designates ample time for teacher modeling, guided practice, and independent application in reading, spelling, and writing tasks to support accuracy and automaticity. Materials also include regular distributed, cumulative, and interleaved review to reinforce previously taught phonics skills across lessons and units.

  • Materials include reasonable pacing of newly taught phonics skills. 

    • According to the Teacher Resources, Research in Action, in Grade 2, materials introduce new phonics skills in a systematic sequence, moving from single-syllable review of consonant digraphs and vowel teams to more complex spelling patterns, multisyllabic words, and inflectional endings. Instruction is paced so that students encounter one new skill at a time, supported by Sound/Spelling Cards and blending routines. Each lesson builds on prior learning and provides explicit introduction before advancing to more complex applications. 

      • For example, in Unit 0, Getting Started, Day 1, Phonics and Decoding, students review consonant digraphs and then are introduced to /ă/ spelled a using Sound/Spelling Card 1-Lamb. The lesson explicitly distinguishes vowels from consonants, reminds students that every word or syllable contains a vowel, and models the short a sound in lamb. Students connect the sound to its spelling in isolation before applying it in blending routines and dictation practice. 

      The pacing and structure is consistent across Grade 2, with each new sound-spelling introduced in isolation through Sound/Spelling Cards, reinforced through explicit blending and dictation routines, and applied in connected decodable reading and writing tasks. 

  • The lesson plan design allots time to include sufficient student practice to work towards automaticity. 

    • In Unit 1, Lesson 3, Day 2, students analyze how adding inflectional endings -s and -es changes base words, noting the effect on syllable count (e.g., cloth -> cloths, rich -> riches). Practice continues as students read plural nouns from the word lines, use them in sentences, and apply the sound-spelling correspondences in context. Opportunities for oral practice reinforce automaticity by requiring repeated recognition and application of the inflectional endings in varied tasks. 

    • In Unit 5, Lesson 4, Day 1, students read words from word lines, identify the target spellings in context, and blend them into complete words using established routines. Practice extends to sentences, where students locate and read words with the /aw/ sound, rereading for fluency. Additional application occurs in Skills Practice 2 pages, where students independently apply their knowledge of the /aw/ spellings in writing tasks. Dictation and spelling routines reinforce the connection between sound and spelling, requiring students to produce words and sentences with accuracy and automaticity. 

  • Materials contain distributed, cumulative, and intervleaved opportunities for students to practice and review all previously learned grade-level phonics. 

    • In Unit 0, Getting Started, Day 10, materials provide cumulative review of previously introduced Sound/Spelling Cards by having students identify consonants and vowels, recognize features such as color coding and blanks, and state the corresponding sounds. Students apply blending routines (Whole-Word Blending and Closed Syllables) to read words systematically and extend practice by blending sentences in connected text. Oral language activities require students to read words, use them in original sentences, and identify vocabulary through teacher clues, reinforcing phonics patterns in multiple contexts. Dictation routines further support interleaved review by prompting students to write and proofread words with varied spellings, using Sound/Spelling Cards as reference tools. 

    • In Unit 6, Lesson 5, Day 1, Phonics and Decoding, Contrast /oo/ and /u/, /aw/ and /ow/, materials provide cumulative review of multiple previously taught phonics patterns by revisiting /oo/ /ŭ/, /aw/, and /ow/ using Sound/Spelling Cards 31, 40, 42, and 43. Students reread words across word lines that contrast these sounds and apply blending routines to support accuracy and fluency. Sentences integrate all four target vowel sounds, requiring students to identify, read, and reread words in connected text. Oral language activities extend review by having students select words, state the vowel sound, and use the words in original sentences, while also distinguishing multiple-meaning words and synonyms from the word lines. Guided practice in Skills Practice 2 reinforces distributed review through written tasks, and dictation routines provide additional opportunities to apply the target and previously learned spellings in context.

Indicator 1j

2 / 4

Materials include systematic and explicit phonics instruction with repeated teacher modeling.

  • Materials contain explicit instructions for systematic and repeated teacher modeling of newly-taught phonics patterns. 

  • Lessons include blending and segmenting practice using structured, consistent blending routines with teacher modeling.

  • Lessons include dictation of words and sentences using the newly-taught phonics pattern(s).

  • Materials include teacher guidance for corrective feedback when needed for students.

The phonics instruction in Open Court Reading partially meets the expectations for Indicator 1j. The materials include systematic and explicit modeling of sound-spelling correspondences through structured routines. The teacher consistently models how to identify, blend, and encode new phonics patterns, providing clear demonstrations and cumulative practice that connect to decoding and encoding in words and sentences. Lessons incorporate repeated modeling across blending and dictation routines to support mastery of newly taught sound-spelling patterns. However, materials include only general corrective feedback prompts through brief Teacher Tips that direct the teacher to model correct sounds or spellings. Common student errors are not embedded within lessons, and task-specific feedback for in-the-moment correction is limited. 

Note: This indicator is analyzed at the lesson level to examine the instructional progression within and across lessons. Repeated references to a single week or lesson reflect the structured sequence of explicit instruction and guided practice, which is representative of how the materials support this skill throughout the year. 

  • Materials contain explicit instructions for systematic and repeated teacher modeling of newly taught phonics patterns. 

    • In Unit 1, Lesson 1, Day 1, Phonics and Decoding: /ch/ spelled ch, /th/ spelled th, and /sh/ spelled sh, the teacher introduces the consonant digraphs using Sound/Spelling Cards 32, 33, and 34, explaining that each represents a single sound made by two or more letters students already know. The teacher models how the letters t and h combine to make one sound and demonstrates the difference between voiced /th/ (the) and unvoiced /th/ (thank) by prompting students to feel the vibration in their voice boxes. The teacher explicitly defines the term consonant digraph and explains that it refers to two letters that make one new sound. 

    • In Unit 2, Lesson 1, Day 1, Phonics and Decoding: /ā/ spelled a_e, the teacher introduces the long vowel sound /ā/ using Sound/Spelling Card 27 and prompts students to identify the yellow background color, explaining that it represents a long-vowel sound. The teacher models the Open Syllable Routine (Routine 5) to explain that when a single vowel spelling is not followed by a consonant, the vowel sound is usually long. Using the word vacate, the teacher demonstrates how to identify vowel and consonant spellings, mark each spelling with a V or C, insert a slash to show the syllable break (va/cate), and blend each syllable separately and then together. 

  • Lessons include blending and segmenting practice using structured, consistent blending routines with teacher modeling. 

    • In Unit 3, Lesson 4, Day 1, Phonics and Decoding: /s/ spelled ce, ci_, and cy, materials include blending and segmenting practice using structured, consistent routines with teacher modeling. The teacher introduces the sound /s/ and its spellings using Sound/Spelling Card 19, then models blending using Routine 2, the Whole-Word Blending Routine. The teacher blends and reads the words in the first line, prompting students to repeat the process and reread any words they cannot read fluently or automatically. Students apply the modeled blending to connected text using Routine 3, the Blending Sentences Routine, as the teacher displays and reads each sentence, noting spelling patterns such as the silent final e in Celeste. The Teacher Tip extends blending practice to multisyllabic words by guiding students to identify syllable breaks in words such as icy, fancy, criticize, and recipe. 

    • In Unit 5, Lesson 3, Day 1, Dictation and Spelling, materials include blending and segmenting practice using structured, consistent routines with teacher modeling. The teacher uses Routine 7, the Whole-Word Dictation Routine, and Routine 8, the Sentence Dictation Routine, to provide systematic decoding and encoding practice. The teacher says each word, uses it in a sentence, and repeats it. Students repeat the word, segment each sound, and write the word while referring to the Sound/Spelling Cards. The teacher guides students to proofread each line and correct errors by circling and rewriting misspelled words. 

      • Sentence dictation extends the blending and segmenting routines to connected text. The teacher dictates one word at a time following the established dictation routines and prompts students to attend to capitalization and end punctuation. Example words include goodness, compound, chowder, noun, vowel, and hook, with challenge words powwow, scrounge, and rookie. Example sentences include Carlos found a picture book at the shop downtown, and I’m full after eating such great cooking!

  • Lessons include dictation of words and sentences using the newly taught phonics pattern(s). 

    • In Unit 1, Lesson 4, Day 3, Blending, the teacher introduces the schwa sound ) and explains that it represents an unstressed vowel sound similar to /u/. Students extend blending practice to sentences using Routine 3, the Blending Sentences Routine. The teacher displays each word in the sentence, blends unfamiliar words using the Whole-Word Blending Routine, and prompts students to reread the sentence with expression. The lesson concludes with students using selected words in sentences,  providing opportunities for encoding and oral dictation-like practice of the newly introduced schwa pattern. Example sentences include Why did Mable travel seven blocks to bring us pickles? and Use a metal funnel to trickle sand into the bottle. 

    • In Unit 6, Lesson 1, Dictation and Spelling, the teacher uses Routine 7, the Whole-Word Dictation Routine, and Routine 8, the Sentence Dictation Routine, to dictate words and sentences for students to write. The teacher says each word, uses it in a sentence, and repeats it. Students segment each sound, write the word, and reference the Sound/Spelling Cards to confirm spellings. The teacher guides students to proofread after each line and correct any errors by circling and rewriting misspelled words. Sentences for dictation include Stan thought the test was tough and I Hope I brought enough snacks for everyone. 

  • Materials include general teacher guidance for corrective feedback when needed for students. 

    • In Unit 2, Lesson 4, Day 3, Dictation and Spelling, a Teacher Tip emphasizes prompting students to ask, “Which spelling?” when uncertain about which sound-spelling to use, reminding them to reference the Sound/Spelling Cards and seek assistance as needed to ensure accurate application of multiple spelling patterns. This corrective feedback provides general guidance that can be applied across spelling tasks rather than task-specific guidance tied to the particular phonics skill being taught. 

    • In Unit 5, Lesson 1, Day 1, Phonics and Decoding: /oo/ spelled oo, the Teacher Tip: Corrective Feedback directs the teacher to respond to decoding errors with specific language: “That word doesn’t sound quite right. Let’s read the word again.” The teacher models the correct pronunciation, points to the letter, says the sound, and has students repeat the sound. The guidance instructs the teacher to use the Whole-Word Blending Routine to blend the word with students and repeat the procedure for additional practice. This corrective feedback provides general guidance that can be applied to a range of decoding or sound-spelling errors, rather than offering task-specific guidance tailored to the specific phonics skill being taught. 

      Materials provide only general guidance for corrective feedback. Common student errors are not consistently embedded within lesson routines, and teacher support for in-the-moment feedback is limited to brief side notes rather than explicit, task-specific guidance within the instructional steps.

Indicator 1k

4 / 4

Materials include frequent practice opportunities for students to decode and encode words that consist of common and newly-taught sound and spelling patterns.

  • Lessons provide students with regular opportunities to decode words with taught phonics patterns. 

  • Lessons provide students with regular opportunities to encode words with taught phonics patterns.

  • Student-guided practice and independent practice of blending sounds using the sound-spelling pattern(s) are varied and frequent, supporting skill retention and automaticity.

  • Materials provide opportunities for students to engage in word-level decoding practice focused on accuracy and automaticity.

The decoding and encoding practice opportunities in Open Court Reading meet the expectations for Indicator 1k. The materials include frequent and varied opportunities for students to decode and encode words using common and newly taught sound-spelling patterns. Daily phonics lessons integrate explicit teacher modeling with structured routines that provide consistent decoding practice at both the word and sentence level. Encoding is reinforced through Whole-Word and Sentence Dictation routines that guide students to apply target phonics patterns, proofread, and correct misspellings for accuracy. Lessons include cumulative blending and rereading activities that emphasize accuracy, fluency, and automaticity, ensuring students have multiple opportunities to apply their phonics knowledge in connected text. 

Note: This indicator is analyzed at the lesson level to examine the instructional progression within and across lessons. Repeated references to a single week or lesson reflect the structured sequence of explicit instruction and guided practice, which is representative of how the materials support this skill throughout the year.

  • Lessons provide students with regular opportunities to decode words with taught phonics patterns. 

    • In Unit 2, Lesson 2, Day 1, Blending, students use Routine 2, Whole-Word Blending to decode words containing the taught long ō sound spelled o and o_e.  Students blend and read words from the word lines (go, sold, both, most, tadpole, suppose, memo, gecko). The teacher applies Routine 4, Closed Syllables to guide students in breaking multisyllabic words such as tadpole into syllables and identifying the short-vowel sound in the closed syllable. Routine 5, Open Syllables supports analysis of words such as over, bonus, cobra, and broken, with students identifying vowel-consonant-vowel patterns that produce long-vowel sounds. These blending activities provide multiple decoding opportunities with both open- and closed-syllable words that contain the new long ō sound-spelling pattern.  

    • In Unit 4, Lesson 5, Day 1, Decoding, students use Sound/Spelling Card 40 to learn the /ōō/ sound spelled u, u_e, and ue. The teacher points out that these spellings can also represent /ū/, reinforcing the concept of multiple spellings for similar vowel sounds. Students practice decoding words from the word lines (duty, tulip, lunar, Jupiter, tune, rule, consume, attitude) and apply the patterns within connected sentences, “Stuart knew Mr. Winslow would include something new to spruce up the new classroom” and “Ruby told Mr. Lewis the truth and said she was sorry she ripped the costume.” 

  • Lessons provide students with regular opportunities to encode words with taught phonics patterns. 

    • In Unit 2, Lesson 2, Day 1, Dictation and Spelling, students apply Routine 7, Whole-Word Dictation and Routine 8, Sentence Dictation to encode words and sentences and sentences containing the o and o_e spellings for /ō/. The teacher dictates each word (no, clover, focus, robe, doze, post) and challenge words (poem, echo, microscope). Students write each dictated word and reread for accuracy, circling and rewriting any misspelled words. During sentence dictation, students apply the same phonics patterns in context (“The host told both jokes.” and “I will hold the bag open for you.”

    • In Unit 4, Lesson 5, Day 1, Dictation and Spelling, students apply Routine 7, Whole-Word Dictation and Routine 8, Sentence Dictation to encode words with the u, u_e, ew, and ue spellings for /ōō/. The teacher dictates words (brew, flute, student, glue, super, rude) and challenge words (absolute, screwdrive), prompting students to apply taught spellings and proofread for accuracy. Students also write dictated sentences, “Sue knew something seemed off with the tuna salad” and “I’m sorry you don’t like your new haircut”), reinforcing application of the phonics patterns in connected text. Differentiated support extends encoding practice during Workshop, which is what the material calls small-group instruction, where students write additional words, rhyming pairs, and contrasts pairs for /ōō/ and /ū/, providing cumulative practice and review. 

  • Student-guided practice and independent practice of blending sounds using the sound-spelling pattern(s) is varied and frequent. 

    • In Unit 2, Lesson 2, Day 2, students participate in varied blending routines that support both guided and independent decoding practice. Whole-Word Blending and Blending Sentences routines allow students to read individual words and then apply them in connected sentences such as “Flo is home with a cold” and “Hold both gates open to let the horse come in.” The teacher incorporates both open- and closed-syllable routines to expand blending practice to multisyllabic words (tadpole, bonus, broken). Students reread the words and sentences for fluency, providing frequent opportunities to blend and decode independently across different word types and sentence contexts. 

    • In Unit 4, Lesson 5, Day 1, students engage in multiple blending and word-analysis tasks using the four target spellings for /ōō/. In the About the Words section, students identify the specific spelling of /ōō/ in example words, determine syllable types (e.g., open or closed), and analyze compound words such as newborn. During Guided Practice, students complete Skills Practice pages, blending and writing words that feature u, u_e, ew, and ue, first as a class and then independently. 

  • Materials provide opportunities for students to engage in word-level decoding practice focused on accuracy and automaticity. 

    • In Unit 2, Lesson 2, Day 1, students reread blending words and sentences until they read them accurately and fluently. The Teacher Tip, Open and Closed Syllables directs students to check for accuracy by asking, “Does it sound right?” and “Does it make sense?” This self-monitoring guidance reinforces automaticity through repeated decoding and rereading. 

    • In Unit 4, Lesson 5, Day 1, Decoding and Guided Practice activities emphasize accuracy and fluency with the four spellings for /ōō/. Students reread word lists and sentences until they can read them naturally and automatically. Teacher guidance encourages rereading and self-correction using contextual cues, “Does it sound right?” and “Does it make sense?”. Differentiated tasks further promote automaticity by asking students to generate and compare new /ōō/ and /ū/ words during Workshop.

Indicator 1l

4 / 4

Spelling rules and generalizations are taught one at a time at a reasonable pace. Spelling words and generalizations are practiced to automaticity.

  • Spelling rules and generalizations are aligned to the phonics scope and sequence. 

  • Materials include explanations for spelling of specific words or spelling rules. 

  • Students have sufficient opportunities to practice spelling rules and generalizations.

The instruction and practice of spelling rules and generalizations in Open Court Reading meet the expectations for Indicator 1l. Spelling instruction follows a systematic and sequential progression that aligns with the phonics scope and sequence, moving from sound-spelling correspondences to structural conventions and meaning-based patterns. Materials provide explicit explanations of spelling rules and connect new learning to previously taught phonics patterns, supporting cumulative skill development. Students have frequent, structured opportunities to apply and practice spelling rules through modeled instruction, guided dictation, proofreading, and correction routines. The lessons’ predictable structure allows students to reinforce spelling generalizations through repeated application in both isolated word work and connected text. Differentiated tasks and challenge words extend practice and promote mastery and automaticity with grade-level spelling patterns. 

  • Spelling rules and generalizations are aligned to the phonics scope and sequence. 

    • According to the Program Overview, spelling lessons are organized around specific spelling patterns that progress from phonetic to structural and meaning pattern in a logical sequence. Each week’s word list is derived from the Phonics and Fluency or Word Analysis skills taught in the Foundational Skills lessons, ensuring alignment between phonics instruction and spelling. The overview explains that sound-based patterns are introduced first, followed by conventions for adding endings (e.g., dropping the final e, doubling final consonants), and later meaning-based patterns such as prefixes, suffixes, and root words. 

      • In Unit 2, Lesson 1, Day 1, spelling words such as paper, cradle, brave, date, shape, and label align to the phonics scope and sequence, which designates /ā/ spelled a and a_e as the focus sound-spellings for this lesson.

      • In Unit 3, Lesson 5, Day 1, spelling words such as high, supply, dry, slight, pie, and tried align to the phonics scope and sequence, which designates /ī/ spelled igh, ie, and y as the focus sound-spellings for this lesson.

  • Materials include explanations for spelling of specific words or spelling rules. 

    • In Unit 2, Lesson 1, Day 1, Blending and Dictation and Spelling, the teacher provides explicit explanations for the spelling of the long /ā/ sound and the concept of open syllables. Using Sound/Spelling Card 27, the teacher introduces /ā/ spelled a and a_e and explains that "when a single vowel spelling is not followed by a consonant, the vowel sound is usually long. This is called an open syllable.” The teacher models how to divide words such as vacate by identifying vowel and consonant spellings and marking them with V and C before drawing a syllable division (va/cate). 

    • In Unit 4, Lesson 1, Day 1, Decoding and Dictation and Spelling, the teacher provides an explicit explanation of the spelling generalization for the /ō/ sound. Using Sound/Spelling Card 30, the teacher introduces /ō/ spelled ow and oa, and asks students what spelling for /ō/ they have already learned (o and o_e), directly connecting new spellings to previously taught ones. The teacher models the pronunciation of the /ō/ sound and guides students to identify and blend words that follow these new patterns. The Teacher Tip: Dictation further reinforces the rule application, instructing the teacher to remind students to ask “Which spelling?” when they are unsure which /ō/ spelling to use. 

  • Students have sufficient opportunities to practice spelling rules and generalizations. 

    • In Unit 3, Lesson 3, Day 1, Dictation and Spelling, students practice spelling words with previously taught vowel patterns (paper, dainty, relay, teammate, alley) and plural formation (daisies, buddies). Using Whole-Word and Sentence Dictation routines, students write words and sentences, proofread their spellings, and correct errors by comparing to the model on the board. Differentiated instruction provides extended practice through plural noun exercises and workshop writing tasks, allowing students to apply rules for forming plurals in context. Challenge words (everyday, mayonnaise, severely) and connected-sentence application (“Jamie made a playing green case for her buddy.”) provide cumulative, scaffolded opportunities to reinforce and internalize spelling generalizations through repeated use and correction. 

    • In Unit 5, Lesson 3, Day 1, Dictation and Spelling, students engage in structured, repeated practice applying known spelling patterns through dictation and proofreading routines. Using Whole-Word and Sentence Dictation, students spell multisyllabic and compound words (goodness, compound, chowder, noun, vowel, hook) and challenge words (powwow, scrounge, rookie). After dictation, students compare their spellings to the correct model, circle and correct errors, and reread their sentences, “Carlos found a picture book at the shop downtown.” and  “I’m full after eating such great cooking!”

Indicator 1m

4 / 4

Materials include decodable texts with phonics aligned to the program’s scope and sequence and opportunities for students to use decodables for multiple readings.

  • Decodable texts reflect grade-level phonics patterns aligned to the program's scope and sequence. 

  • Lessons include detailed plans for repeated readings of decodable texts to reinforce accuracy, automaticity, and confidence. 

  • Reading practice occurs in decodable texts aligned to the taught phonics patterns and reflects absence of predictable texts. Use of decodable texts decreases over time as students demonstrate decoding proficiency and transition into increasingly complex texts.

The decodable texts and instructional routines in Open Court Reading meet the expectations for Indicator 1m. Decodable texts align to the program’s phonics scope and sequence and are incorporated into fluency routines that provide multiple opportunities for repeated reading, teacher modeling, partner practice, and attention to accuracy and expression. Students read two decodable texts each instructional week, and instruction appropriately transitions to increasingly complex texts over time while continuing to reinforce decoding and fluency skills through structured practice.

Note: This indicator is analyzed at the lesson level to examine the instructional progression within and across lessons. Repeated references to a single week or lesson reflect the structured sequence of explicit instruction and guided practice, which is representative of how the materials support this skill throughout the year.

  • Decodable texts reflect grade-level phonics patterns aligned to the program’s scope and sequence. 

    • In Unit 1, Lesson 1, Day 2, Fluency, Reading a Decodable Story, students read Book 2, Story 10, Chips to apply taught phonics patterns and high-frequency words in connected text. The lesson introduces new high-frequency words (far, upon) and reviews previously taught words (away, could, too). Instruction directs students to refer to the Sound/Spelling Cards while blending decodable words to support accurate decoding. The materials integrate reading practice with the phonics and high-frequency word patterns taught in the unit, noting that decodable texts are aligned to the program’s phonics scope and sequence.

    • In Unit 12, Lesson 6, Day 1, Fluency, Reading a Decodable Story, students read Book 7, Story 55, The Seminole Tribe in South Florida to apply grade-level phonics and word recognition skills in connected text. The lesson reviews previously taught high-frequency words (any, are, come, could, into, their, very, water, would) and introduces the nondecodable story word native to build vocabulary and support comprehension. The decodable aligns to the program’s cumulative phonics scope and sequence by incorporating known spelling patterns and high-frequency words while integrating increasingly, content-based text. 

  • Lessons include detailed plans for repeated readings of decodable texts to reinforce accuracy, automaticity, and confidence. 

    • In Unit 1, Lesson 1, Day 2, Fluency, Reading a Decodable Story, Book 2, Story 10, Chips, the teacher uses Routine 9, Reading a Decodable Story, which provides step-by-step guidance for multiple readings of the text. Students preview the story by reading the title, browning illustrations, and discussing predictions before reading each page silently and aloud. The routine includes teacher modeling for monitoring accuracy, confirming understanding, and self-correcting misread words. After the initial reading, students reread Chips with a partner, alternating reading and listening to build fluency and intonation. The lesson includes explicit instruction on reading with expression by using punctuation cues such as question marks to guide pitch and tone. Students reread the story several times to strengthen fluency and confidence.

    • In Unit 12, Lesson 6, Day 1, Fluency, Reading a Decodable Story, students engage in multiple readings of The Seminole Tribe in South Florida to build fluency and comprehension. After the first reading, students reread the story with a partner, alternating pages and rereading aloud several times to strengthen accuracy and expression. The lesson’s Building Fluency guidance supports repeated oral practice, encouraging students to refine phrasing, pacing, and comprehension across multiple readings. Differentiated instruction provides additional opportunities through Practice Decodable 55, Communities in Los Angeles, which reinforces the same phonics patterns and fluency goals during Workshop time for students requiring more practice. 

  • Reading practice occurs in decodable texts aligned to the taught phonics patterns and reflects an absence of predictable texts. Use of decodable texts decreases over time as students demonstrate decoding proficiency and transition into increasingly complex texts. 

    • In Unit 1, Lesson 1, Day 2, Fluency, Reading a Decodable Story, reading practice occurs in Book 2, Story 10, Chips, which reinforces phonics and high-frequency words introduced in instruction. Students apply decoding strategies, reread the text for fluency, and respond to comprehension questions. Fluency routines include partner reading and alternating page reading to promote prosody and confidence. The lesson includes differentiated instruction through echo reading for students who need additional support and extended practice with Practice Decodable 10, Finch Ranch, which reinforces the same phonics patterns and supports accuracy and automaticity for all learners.  

    • In Unit 12, Lesson 6, Day 1, Fluency Reading a Decodable, reading practice in Book 7, Story 55, The Seminole Tribe in South Florida integrates informational content with controlled phonics and high-frequency word patterns. Students read to locate textual evidence and respond to comprehension questions, focusing on meaning rather than relying on repetitive sentence structures or illustrations. The lesson also introduces a nondecodable word (native), signaling a gradual expansion of linguistic complexity with decodable reading. 

      • By Day 4, fluency instruction expands to include modeling of appropriate pausing and pacing during oral reading using the informational text, “The United States of America.” Students practice reading aloud with attention to punctuation and phrasing, demonstrating a shift toward broader fluency application beyond fully controlled decodable stories. Differentiated guidance provides paired reading support and pacing practice, indicating that while decodable texts continue to support fluency, students are also transitioning into texts with richer context and more complex sentence structures. 

      Throughout the year, Grade 2 students read two decodable texts each instructional week. These decodables align with the phonetic skills taught in the unit and are incorporated into fluency routines that include repeated readings, high-frequency word review, and guidance for accuracy, phrasing, and expression, supporting ongoing development of decoding and fluency skills.

Indicator 1n

2 / 4

Materials regularly and systematically offer assessment opportunities that measure student progress of phonics in- and out-of-context (as indicated by the program scope and sequence). 

  • Materials regularly and systematically provide a variety of assessment opportunities over the course of the year to demonstrate students’ progress toward mastery and independence in phonics.

  • Assessment materials provide teachers and students with information concerning students’ current skills/level of understanding of phonics.

  • Materials support teachers with instructional suggestions for assessment-based steps to help students to progress toward mastery in phonics.

The phonics assessment opportunities in Open Court Reading partially meet expectations for Indicator 1n. Materials provide regular and systematic assessments across the year and include tools for scoring, recording results, and tracking student progress. Most phonics assessments measure decoding in isolation, with limited opportunities for students to demonstrate phonics application in connected text. While lesson and unit assessments offer targeted phonics-based recommendations, benchmark assessments provide only broad guidance that does not connect specific performance results to specific reteach or intervention lessons. As a result, the teacher must determine the appropriate next instructional steps on their own when interpreting benchmark assessment data.

  • Materials regularly and systematically provide a variety of assessment opportunities over the course of the year to demonstrate students’ progress toward mastery and independence in phonics. 

    • In Unit 1, Lesson 1, Day 5, Monitor Progress, Informal Assessment, students complete interactive eActivities and eGames to practice and demonstrate mastery of phonics and high-frequency word skills introduced in the lesson. These digital tasks are used to informally assess decoding, spelling, and word recognition. Students practice reading, spelling, and typing each word as part of an integrated review routine that measures accuracy and automaticity with previously taught sound-spelling correspondences and high-frequency words (far, upon, much, start, which, away, could, too, or want). This is considered an out of context assessment. 

    • In Unit 3, Lesson 1, Day 5, Formal Assessment, students complete a written task from Lesson and Unit Assessment 1 to assess understanding of the target sound-spelling pattern /ā/ spelled ai_ and ay_. Students unscramble words, write the correct word on the line, and identify the spelling pattern for each item (ai_or ay). 

      • In the Lesson and Unit Assessment 1, students complete a formal phonics assessment that measures accuracy in decoding, spelling, and syllable identification. Tasks include selecting correct spelling of words (lunsh/lunch/luntch; wich/ wish/ wish; yord/ jard/ yard) and identifying words with specific syllable types (e.g., closed syllables in dinner, basket, and summer). These out of context assessments occur at regular intervals within each unit and lesson cycle. 

    • According to the Benchmark Assessment Guide, the materials include three cumulative evaluations administered throughout the year - after Unit 1 (Week 6), after Unit 3 (Week 18), and at the end of Unit 6 (Week 34). Each benchmark includes a 100-Point Skills Battery that samples skills from six strands of the grade-level curriculum, including Phonics Word Analysis, and Spelling. 

      • The Phonics strand includes five selected-response items that measure student decoding accuracy and application of taught sound-spelling correspondences. For example, in Test 1, students identify the word in each row that shares the same sound as an underlined part of a model word (e.g., cake, hat, coat, paid, team). This is considered an out of context assessment.

      Across the materials, most phonics assessments measure decoding in isolation through word-level or selected-response tasks, with limited opportunities for students to demonstrate phonics application in connected text within the designated phonics assessment components.

  • Assessment materials provide teachers and students with information concerning students’ current skills/level of understanding of phonics. 

    • In Unit 4, Lesson 1, Day 4, the Monitor Progress, Formal Assessment provides the teacher with guidance for interpreting results and identifying students’ current skill levels. The scoring guidance categorizes student performance as follows 0-79 percent (Approaching), 80-94 percent (On Grade Level), and 95-100 percent (Advanced). The teacher uses these results to determine each student’s level of mastery and to identify which sound-spelling correspondences or decoding patterns require reinforcement (e.g., /ō/ spelled ow, oa, o, and o_e). 

      This performance guidance is provided for each formal lesson assessment throughout the program. 

    • According to the Benchmark Assessment Guide, each assessment includes a Benchmark Assessment Record and Tracking Charts that allow the teacher to record and monitor student performance by strand. The teacher documents scores for each component, including the Phonics strand and the total 100-point composite. Scoring thresholds categorize student performance as Approaching (0-79%), On Grade Level (80-94%), and Advanced (95-100%). The Benchmark Tracking Charts allow the teacher to visualize individual and class trends, providing actionable data on phonics performance and growth. 

  • Materials support teachers with some  instructional suggestions for assessment-based steps to help students to progress toward mastery in phonics. 

    • In Unit 5, Lesson 5, Day 5, Phonics and Word Analysis Assessment Recommendation, following the assessment, materials direct the teacher to use the Post-Assessment Foundational Skills Recommendations to provide immediate reteaching and targeted phonics practice. The Foundational Skills, Phonics and Decoding lesson offers structured routines that reteach the assessed sound-spelling correspondences /oi/ spelled oi and oy. The teacher uses Routine 2, Whole-Word Blending, to model fluent reading of the target words (Joyce, loyal, point, choice, enjoying, annoy, avoiding, rejoice). If students experience difficulty, the lesson directs the teacher to revert to Routine 1, Sound-by-Sound Blending, for additional support. Students reread the word lines naturally, underline the /oi/ spelling in each word, and use the words in oral sentences to reinforce decoding accuracy and word meaning. The teacher extends practice through Routine 3, Blending Sentences, using the sentence, He is employed in the old coins department, integrating decoding, fluency, and contextual application. Students then locate additional /oi/ words in classroom reading materials and categorize them by spelling pattern (oi or oy).  This structured post-assessment guidance appears after each formal lesson assessment, directing the teacher to provide targeted foundational skills instruction and practice based on student performance levels. 

    • According to the Assessment Handbook, Lesson Assessments and Benchmark Assessments include diagnostic information intended to inform next-step instruction. The teacher is directed to use Reteach Lessons for students approaching level, the Intervention Teacher’s Guide for those needing more intensive phonics support, and the English Learner Teacher’s Guide for language-based scaffolds. Lesson and unit assessments often include more specific phonics-based recommendations tied directly to the content assessed. However, guidance following benchmark assessments is more general and does not map specific performance results to particular reteach or intervention lessons, requiring the teacher to determine next instructional steps independently.

Criterion 1.2: Word Recognition and Word Analysis

9 / 12

Materials and instruction support students in learning and practicing regularly and irregularly spelled words.

The Open Court Reading materials partially meet expectations for Criterion 1.4 in Grade 2 by providing systematic instruction and practice in high-frequency word recognition and explicit instruction in syllabication and morpheme analysis, with limited support for word analysis and assessment-based instructional follow-up.Materials include consistent routines for introducing and reviewing high-frequency words, with Grade 2 introducing 84 high-frequency words that students regularly encounter in isolation and connected text to build decoding accuracy and automaticity. Students also engage in encoding of high-frequency words through dictated word- and sentence-level tasks. However, instruction includes limited explicit modeling that identifies the regularly spelled and temporarily irregularly spelled parts of high-frequency words, with an emphasis on accurate reading rather than analysis of sound–spelling relationships. Materials provide explicit, systematic instruction in syllable division and morpheme analysis beginning in Unit 4, with repeated opportunities for students to apply these strategies when decoding and encoding multisyllabic words across units. Assessments aligned to the scope and sequence measure student progress in word recognition and analysis, but guidance for using assessment results to inform targeted instructional next steps is limited and inconsistently embedded. Overall, materials support word recognition and provide strong instruction in syllabication and morpheme analysis, but offer uneven support for word analysis of high-frequency words and assessment-driven instruction.

Indicator 1o

1 / 2

Materials include explicit instruction in identifying the regularly spelled part and the temporarily irregularly spelled part of words. High-frequency word instruction includes spiraling review.

  • Materials include systematic and explicit instruction of high-frequency words with an explicit and consistent instructional routine.

  • Materials include teacher modeling of the spelling and reading of high-frequency words that includes connecting the phonemes to the graphemes. 

  • Materials include a sufficient quantity of high-frequency words for students to make reading progress.

The high-frequency word instruction in Open Court Reading partially meets the expectations for Indicator 1o. Materials provide consistent routines for introducing and reviewing high-frequency words, and students encounter these words regularly in connected text across units. Grade 2 materials introduce 84 high-frequency words, offering sufficient quantity for reading progress. However, lessons include limited explicit modeling of phoneme-grapheme connections or analysis of regularly and irregularly spelled word parts. Teacher modeling focuses primarily on reading words accurately in context rather than examining their sound-spelling relationships. As a result, students receive few opportunities to analyze orthographic features of high-frequency words and develop deeper connections between sounds and their corresponding spellings. 

  • Materials include systematic and explicit instruction of high-frequency words with an explicit and consistent instructional routine. 

    • In Unit 1, Lesson 1, Day 2 (Core Pre-Decodable 5), the materials direct the teacher to introduce the high-frequency words can and on using Routine 1A. The teacher writes each word on the board, reads it aloud, uses it in a sentence, prompts students to repeat it, and guides students to generate their own sentences. Each word is added to the High-Frequency Word Bank, and previously taught words are reviewed by pointing to them and having students read them aloud.

    • In Unit 2, Lesson 3, Day 2, High-Frequency Words, the materials direct the teacher to review the high-frequency word get by pointing to it in the High-Frequency Word Bank, having students read it aloud, and prompting a volunteer to use the word in a sentence. The lesson then reviews additional high-frequency words by reading them from the Word Bank.

  • Materials include limited teacher modeling of the spelling and reading of high-frequency words that includes connecting the phonemes to the graphemes. 

    • In Unit 3, Lesson 4, Day 2, the materials list again, center, and circle as new high-frequency words and include a set of previously taught words for review; however, the lesson does not provide explicit instruction or teacher modeling of these words before students encounter them in the decodable story. The routine moves directly to reading the decodable using Routine 9, with no guidance for connecting phonemes to graphemes, segmenting or blending the sounds in the words, or identifying regularly or temporarily irregularly spelled parts.

    • In Unit 5, Lesson 1, Day 2, the materials list warm and wash as new high-frequency words and include several previously introduced words for review; however, the lesson does not provide explicit instruction or modeling of these words before students encounter them in the decodable story. The teacher is directed to have students read the story and focus on accuracy, but there is no guidance to connect phonemes to graphemes, segment or blend the sounds in the words, or identify the regular or temporarily irregular spellings within warm or wash.

      Across lessons, new high-frequency words are listed but not explicitly taught before students encounter them in text, and instruction provides limited modeling that connects phonemes to graphemes or identifies regular and irregular spellings.

  • Materials include a sufficient quantity of high-frequency words for students to make reading progress.

    • Grade 2 materials introduce 84 high-frequency words across six units, with instruction designed to reinforce automatic recognition and fluent reading within connected text. 

    • High-frequency word instruction appears consistently across units, beginning with, 

      • Unit 1: for, upon, much, start, which, never, under, eight, nine, bring, thank, think, seven, use, why, better, first, learn, animal, black, live

      • Unit 2: brother, white, both, hold, open, buy, goes, paste, zero, another, many, about, sign, uncle, write, because, does, often, other, taste, please, three, pull, together

      • Unit 3: gray, believe, carry, different, only, listen, people, again, center, circle, great, light, work, myself, done, easy, piece

      • Unit 4: own, show, few, quite, today, soon, knew, new, something, sorry, everyone

      • Unit 5: warm, wash, full, picture, mouse, ought, small, always, laugh, once

      • Unit 6: brought, everything

Indicator 1p

2 / 2

Instructional opportunities are frequently built into the materials for students to practice and gain decoding automaticity of high-frequency words.

  • Students practice decoding high-frequency words in isolation.

  • Lessons provide students with frequent opportunities to decode high-frequency words in context.

  • Lessons provide students with frequent opportunities to encode high-frequency words in tasks, such as sentences, in order to promote automaticity of high-frequency words.

The instructional opportunities for high-frequency words in Open Court Reading meet expectations for Indicator 1p. Materials provide consistent opportunities for students to decode high-frequency words in isolation through the High-Frequency Words Routine and to apply decoding in connected text through repeated reading of decodable stories. Lessons also include explicit opportunities for students to encode high-frequency words in writing through dictated word and sentence tasks. Together, these routines support the development of accuracy and automaticity through both decoding and encoding of high-frequency words.

Note: This indicator is analyzed at the lesson level to examine the instructional progression within and across lessons. Repeated references to a single week or lesson reflect the structured sequence of explicit instruction and guided practice, which is representative of how the materials support this skill throughout the year.

  • Students practice decoding high-frequency words in isolation. 

    • In Unit 1, Lesson 4, Day 1, the materials provide explicit opportunities for students to decode high-frequency words in isolation. Using Routine 1A, the High-Frequency Words Routine, the teacher introduces bring, thank, and think as whole words before students encounter them in connected text. This routine requires students to read and practice the high-frequency words independently of sentences or passages, supporting accurate decoding and automatic recognition.

    • In Unit 4, Lesson 5, Day 1, materials provide opportunities for students to decode high-frequency words in isolation. Using Routine 1A, the High-Frequency Words Routine, the teacher introduces knew, new, something, and sorry as standalone words before students encounter them in connected text. This routine requires students to read and practice each high-frequency word independently of sentences or passages, supporting accurate decoding and automaticity.

  • Lessons provide students with frequent opportunities to decode high-frequency words in context. 

    • In Unit 1, Lesson 3, Day 4, students apply decoding of new and familiar high-frequency words while reading Book 2, Story 13, A Lunch List using Routine 9, the Reading a Decodable Story Routine. The teacher guides multiple readings - silent, choral, and partner - to reinforce recognition and fluency with high-frequency words in connected text. Students reread the story several times with a partner and respond to comprehension questions requiring them to reference and reread sentences containing high-frequency words (“She needs to get cups for water, napkins, and dishes”). 

    • In Unit 4, Lesson 5, Day 2, students apply decoding of new and review high-frequency words during the reading of Book 5, Story 42, Drew’s True Lesson using Routine 9, the Reading a Decodable Story Routine. Students read the story to practice applying their knowledge of high-frequency words and spelling patterns, rereading it aloud several times with a partner to build fluency and accuracy. Comprehension prompts require students to locate and reread key details that include high-frequency words (“Drew learns not to pretend to be something he is not”). 

  • Lessons provide students with opportunities to encode high-frequency words in tasks, such as sentences, in order to promote automaticity of high-frequency words. 

    • In Unit 1, Lesson 3, Day 3, during Dictation and Spelling instruction, students encode high-frequency words within sentence-level writing using Routine 7, the Whole-Word Dictation Routine, and Routine 8, the Sentence Dictation Routine. The teacher dictates the sentences “The spotted duck rested in the shrubs” and “Eight or nine parts go in this set?” Students write the sentences, applying their knowledge of sound-spelling correspondences and referencing Sound/Spelling Cards when needed. The teacher prompts students to consider spelling choices and to ask, “Which spelling?” when uncertain, reinforcing accurate spelling of high-frequency words such as the, in, or, go, and this within connected text. After writing, students proofread their work as the teacher displays the correct spelling and make corrections as needed.

    • In Unit 4, Lesson 5, Day 1, students encode high-frequency words using Routine 1A, the High-Frequency Words Routine. The teacher introduces the words knew, new, something, and sorry by displaying each word, reading it aloud, and using it in a sentence. Students spell each word together with the teacher, identify known sound–spelling patterns, and receive explicit support for any nondecodable parts of the words. The teacher then dictates each word, one letter at a time, and students write the word. After writing, students use each high-frequency word in a sentence and add the words to the High-Frequency Word Bank for continued reference during writing activities.

Indicator 1q

4 / 4

Materials include explicit instruction in syllabication and morpheme analysis and provide students with practice opportunities to apply learning.

  • Materials contain explicit instruction of syllable types and syllable division that promote decoding and encoding of words. 

  • Materials contain explicit instruction in morpheme analysis to decode unfamiliar words. 

  • Multiple and varied opportunities are provided over the course of the year for students to learn, practice, and apply word analysis strategies.

The instruction and practice for syllabication and morpheme analysis in Open Court Reading meet expectations for Indicator 1q. Materials provide explicit instruction in syllable division and morpheme analysis that supports decoding and encoding of multisyllabic words. Instruction includes direct teaching of how prefixes and suffixes attach to base words, how affixes affect meaning and grammatical function, and how words are divided into syllables for accurate pronunciation and spelling. Students apply these strategies across multiple units beginning in Unit 4, through varied activities, including decoding and syllabication of prefixed and suffixed words, sentence-level analysis, oral language tasks, and guided discussion of word meaning and structure. Together, these lessons provide systematic, explicit, and repeated opportunities for students to learn, practice, and apply word-analysis strategies over the course of the year.

Note: This indicator is analyzed at the lesson level to examine the instructional progression within and across lessons. Repeated references to a single week or lesson reflect the structured sequence of explicit instruction and guided practice, which is representative of how the materials support this skill throughout the year.

  • Materials contain explicit instruction of syllable types and syllable division that promote decoding and encoding of words. 

    • In Unit 4, Lesson 1, Day 3, students receive explicit instruction related to syllable division during decoding of words with prefixes and suffixes using Routine 10, the Words with Prefixes and Suffixes Routine. The teacher explains that prefixes are meaningful parts added to the beginning of base words and explicitly states that prefixes usually form their own syllable when words are divided. Students practice syllabication by separating prefixes from base words, such as dis/like, dis/trust, dis/con/nect, un/kind, and un/writ/ten. The materials model syllable division using slashes and guide students to decode multisyllabic words by identifying syllable boundaries between prefixes and base words.

    • In Unit 5, Lesson 2, Day 3, Word Analysis: Suffixes -er, -or, and -ness, instruction explicitly integrates syllabication with morphological decoding through direct teaching of suffixes –er, –or, and –ness. The teacher models  how each suffix attaches to a base word to form a new word with an altered meaning and part of speech. The lesson includes a direct explanation of how –er and –or change verbs to nouns (for example, run → runner,create → creator) and how –ness changes adjectives to nouns (for example, kind → kindness, soft → softness). Syllabication is explicitly addressed as students are guided to divide multisyllabic words into base words and suffixes (for example, run/ner, re/clin/er, cre/a/tor, hap/pi/ness). The teacher models how to segment and pronounce each syllable and highlight spelling patterns, such as dropping the final e before adding –or and changing y to i before adding –ness. Students then practice reading, writing, and defining the words using syllable-level segmentation to support accurate decoding and spelling.

  • Materials contain explicit instruction in morpheme analysis to decode unfamiliar words. 

    • In Unit 4, Lesson 1, Day 3, the teacher provides explicit instruction in morpheme analysis by teaching the meanings of the prefixes dis- and un- and explaining how prefixes change the meaning of base words. Students identify base words and prefixes, determine word meanings using morphemic analysis, and reassemble words by thinking aloud about the meaning of each part. Students apply this strategy to decode and define words such as dislike, distrust, dishonest, unkind,and unwritten. Instruction also extends to sentence-level application, where students analyze words including disassembled, unstable, unclear, and dislocated by using base words and prefixes to determine meaning.

    • In Unit 5, Lesson 2, Day 3, materials include explicit instruction in morpheme analysis as the teacher uses Routine 10 to teach the meanings of common suffixes (-er, -or, -ness) and how they attach to base words. Students identify base words, discuss their meanings, and learn how each suffix changes the meaning and grammatical function of the word. The teacher models how to analyze and reconstruct words by combining the base word and suffix, and students practice using this structure to determine word meaning and pronunciation. Syllabication guidance further supports decoding by showing how to segment suffixed words (e.g., run/ner, act/or, fit/ness, hap/pi/ness).

  • Multiple and varied opportunities are provided over the course of the year for students to learn, practice, and apply word analysis strategies. 

    • In Unit 4, Lesson 1, Day 3, students apply word analysis strategies across multiple formats, including word lists, syllabicated word examples, sentence reading, oral language activities, and discussion. Students decode and define words with prefixes, practice syllabication of multisyllabic words, identify antonyms formed with prefixes, and use newly formed words in oral sentences. Instruction includes repeated reading of words, analysis of word meaning in context, and guided discussion of how prefixes alter meaning, providing varied opportunities to practice and apply word analysis strategies.

    • In Unit 5, Lesson 2, Day 3, materials provide opportunities for students to learn, practice, and apply word-analysis strategies through explicit study of base words, suffixes, and syllable division. The teacher models how to analyze words by identifying the base word, interpreting the suffix, and examining how the suffix changes meaning and grammatical function. Students then apply this knowledge during guided practice by defining suffixed words, discussing spelling changes, and reading multisyllabic words using provided syllable breaks. These routines offer multiple ways for students to work with word structure—meaning, spelling, and pronunciation—supporting the application of word-analysis strategies during decoding and vocabulary work.

Indicator 1r

2 / 4

Materials regularly and systematically offer assessment opportunities that measure student progress of word recognition and analysis (as indicated by the program scope and sequence). 

  • Materials regularly and systematically provide a variety of assessment opportunities over the course of the year to demonstrate students’ progress toward mastery and independence of word recognition and analysis.

  • Assessment materials provide the teacher and students with information concerning students’ current skills/level of understanding of word recognition and word analysis.

  • Materials support the teacher with instructional suggestions for assessment-based steps to help students to progress toward mastery in word recognition and word analysis.

The assessment opportunities for word recognition and word analysis in Open Court Reading partially meet expectations for this indicator. Materials regularly and systematically assess student progress through a combination of informal digital checks, formal lesson and unit assessments, and benchmark assessments aligned to the scope and sequence. Beginning in Unit 4, students are assessed on word recognition and word analysis skills through activities that measure reading, spelling, typing, and selection of morphologically correct word forms. Assessment tools provide defined performance levels and scoring thresholds that allow teachers to identify students’ current proficiency and track progress over time, including longitudinal growth through benchmark assessments. However, instructional guidance tied to assessment results is limited. While one lesson includes explicit post-assessment recommendations for reteaching word analysis skills, similar guidance is not consistently provided across lessons or units.

Note: This indicator is analyzed at the assessment level to understand how opportunities to measure word recognition and analysis are structured and distributed across the year. Repeated references to weekly assessments and recurring routines reflect embedded, cumulative structures that are representative of the program’s approach to monitoring student progress and supporting responsive instruction over time.

  • Materials regularly and systematically provide a variety of assessment opportunities over the course of the year to demonstrate students’ progress toward mastery and independence of word recognition and analysis. 

    • In Unit 4, Lesson 3, Day 4, Monitor Progress, Informal Assessment, materials include a digital assessment activity in which students practice reading, spelling, and typing high-frequency words such as, few, quite, today, are, their, put, too. Students are prompted to complete each task - read the word, spell the word, and type the word - and receive immediate feedback through an option to check or show the correct answer. 

      • Informal assessments for Word Analysis begin in Unit 4 and continue through Unit 6. 

    • In Unit 5, Lesson 1, Day 5, Monitor Progress, Formal Assessment, Lesson and Unit Assessment 2, Word Analysis - Comparative Ending -er, Superlative Ending -est, and Irregular Comparatives, students read each sentence and select the correct comparative or superlative form (e.g., fast, faster, fastest) to complete the sentence. This assessment measures student understanding of morphological patterns and comparative word forms, allowing the teacher to monitor progress in word analysis. 

      • Formal assessments for Word Analysis begin in Unit 4 and continue through Unit 6.

    • According to the Benchmark Assessment Guide, the materials outline three Benchmark Assessments administered after Unit 1, 3, and 6. Each assessment samples phonics and word analysis skills from the year-long curriculum within a 100-point Skills Battery.

      •  In Benchmark Test 1, administered after Unit 1 (Week 6), students respond to give selected-response items targeting morphological awareness and word meaning. For example, students choose the correct comparative form (close, closer, closest), identify the correct prefix meaning in restart. 

  • Assessment materials provide the teacher and students with information concerning students’ current skills/level of understanding of word recognition and word analysis. 

    • In Unit 5, Lesson 1, Day 5, Phonics and Word Analysis Assessment Recommendations identify performance levels to interpret students' results: Approaching (0-79%), On Level (80-94%), and Beyond Level (95-100%). These data points provide the teacher with clear information on students’ current understanding of comparative and superlative endings and guide subsequent instruction. 

    • According to the Assessment Handbook, the materials provide general  performance expectations for interpreting lesson and unit results, indicating acceptable correct responses (e.g., 48 out of 60 points for Unit 1; 40 out of 50 points for Units 2-6) to determine mastery. Similarly, the Benchmark Assessment Guide clarifies that each benchmark test samples the same skill areas with equivalent difficulty, allowing the teacher to track longitudinal growth in word analysis. Results from the Skills Battery - covering phonics, word analysis, and related language skills - offer the teacher insight into students’ current proficiency levels and progress toward end-of-year mastery. 

  • Materials support the teacher with limited instructional suggestions for assessment-based steps to help students progress toward mastery in word recognition and word analysis. 

    • In Unit 5, Lesson 1, Day 5, Phonics and Word Analysis Assessment Recommendations, materials direct the teacher to use the Post-Assessment Foundational Skills Recommendation to provide additional support for students scoring below 79 percent on the lesson assessment. The Word Analysis: Comparative Ending -er, Superlative Ending -est, and Irregular Comparatives follow-up lesson includes guidance for targeted reteaching - reviewing the meanings of the endings - er and -est, identifying base words, and practicing irregular comparative forms such as little, less, least and much, more most - to reinforce morphological word analysis skills and promote progress toward mastery. 

      Materials provide only that single instance of assessment-based instructional guidance for word analysis, resulting in minimal support for the teacher in using assessment results to inform next steps.

Criterion 1.3: Reading Fluency Development

10 / 12

Materials provide systematic and explicit instruction and practice in oral reading fluency by mid-to-late 1st and 2nd grade. Materials for 2nd grade oral reading fluency practice should vary (e.g., decodables and grade-level texts). Instruction and practice support students’ development of accuracy, rate, and prosody to build fluent, meaningful reading.

The Open Court Reading materials meet expectations for Criterion 1.5 by providing systematic, evidence-based instruction and practice to develop oral reading fluency in Grade 2. Materials include explicit teacher modeling and structured routines using grade-level connected text that support accuracy, rate, and prosody through repeated readings, echo reading, choral reading, and partner practice. Fluency instruction is consistently embedded across lessons and units, allowing students to apply fluent reading behaviors as decoding skills become increasingly secure. Materials also include regular unit and benchmark assessments that measure fluency through accuracy, rate, and prosody indicators, providing teachers with data to monitor progress over time. However, guidance for using assessment results to inform specific, task-level instructional adjustments is generally broad rather than explicit. Overall, the materials provide coherent instruction, practice, and assessment sufficient to support the development of oral reading fluency.

Indicator 1s

4 / 4

Instructional opportunities are built into the materials for systematic, evidence-based, explicit instruction in oral reading fluency.

  • Materials include regular and varied opportunities for explicit, systematic instruction in rate, accuracy, and prosody using grade-level connected text (e.g., decodable texts, poetry, readers’ theater, paired reading).

  • Materials provide opportunities for students to hear fluent reading of grade-level text by a model reader.

  • Materials include a variety of resources for explicit instruction in oral reading fluency, supporting skill development across the year.

The instructional opportunities for oral reading fluency in Open Court meet the expectations for Indicator 1s. Materials provide regular and varied opportunities for explicit, systematic fluency instruction using grade-level decodable text. Lessons consistently incorporate routines that build accuracy, rate, and prosody through modeled reading, repeated readings, and partner practice. The teacher models fluent reading in every decodable lesson, demonstrating phrasing, expression, and appropriate use of punctuation before students echo, choral, and independently reread connected text. Across units, students apply fluency skills through guided decodable reading, partner rereading, comprehension checks, and supplemental practice decodables. These structures offer coherent, evidence-based fluency instruction that supports skill development across the year.

Note: This indicator is analyzed at the lesson level to examine the instructional progression within and across lessons. Repeated references to a single week or lesson reflect the structured sequence of explicit instruction and guided practice, which is representative of how the materials support this skill throughout the year. 

  • Materials include regular and varied opportunities for explicit, systematic instruction in rate, accuracy, and prosody using grade-level decodable connected text. 

    • In Unit 1, Lesson 3, Day 4, Fluency: Reading a Decodable Story, materials provide explicit instruction in oral reading fluency using Book 2, Story 13: “A Lunch List.” The teacher uses Routine 9: Reading a Decodable Story to guide students through repeated readings of connected, decodable text containing newly introduced high-frequency words (eight, nine) and review words (good, too, very, water). Instruction explicitly connects punctuation marks (comma, period, question mark, exclamation point) to fluent phrasing and rate, explaining that pauses signal meaning and comprehension. Students first listen to the teacher model reading with an appropriate rate, then practice reading the story aloud several times with a partner, focusing on reading smoothly, accurately, and with expression. 

    • In Unit 2, Lesson 6, Day 3, Fluency, materials provide explicit fluency instruction connected to the passage “A Wreck” from Skills Practice 1. Students apply the fluency concept introduced on Day 2 as they practice reading decodable text with appropriate rate, accuracy, and expression. Instruction emphasizes interpreting punctuation marks as cues for phrasing—pausing briefly at commas, longer at periods, raising pitch at question marks, and increasing volume at exclamation points. An accompanying Fluency Checklist reminds students to adjust tone, pacing, and rereading for meaning, offering structured guidance for self-monitoring and accuracy.

  • Materials provide opportunities for students to hear fluent reading of grade-level text by a model reader. 

    • In Unit 2, Lesson 6, Day 3, Fluency, the lesson explicitly directs the teacher to model fluent oral reading of sentences from “A Wreck,” demonstrating how expression and intonation change according to punctuation and emotion. The teacher reads aloud examples such as “Jean was shocked!” and “Thanks, Mom and Dad!” while modeling proper voice inflection, rate, and phrasing. Students observe how the teacher’s voice conveys excitement, emphasis, and meaning through prosody. This modeling provides a clear, evidence-based demonstration of expressive, fluent reading, helping students internalize appropriate phrasing and tone for oral reading.

    • In Unit 3, Lesson 2, Day 4, Fluency, Reading a Decodable Story, during Routine 9: Reading a Decodable Story, the teacher models fluent reading by reading aloud portions of “Granddaddy Spider” to demonstrate how dialogue can be read expressively and naturally. The teacher explicitly tells students to “practice reading with expression,” modeling how prosody reflects emotion and punctuation in spoken dialogue. Students hear examples of phrasing, intonation, and emphasis before practicing the same sections in partner rereading. This guided modeling of dialogue reading allows students to internalize fluent oral reading patterns, connecting accurate decoding with expressive phrasing that supports comprehension.

  • Materials include a variety of resources for explicit instruction in oral reading fluency, supporting skill development across the year. 

    • In Unit 1, Lesson 3, Day 4, Fluency: Reading a Decodable Story, fluency instruction in this lesson integrates multiple resources and routines, including Routine 9: Reading a Decodable Story, direct instruction in punctuation for phrasing, and partner rereading practice. Students reread the text multiple times with partners to strengthen accuracy, rate, and expression, while comprehension questions reinforce meaning and engagement with the story. Additional practice opportunities are provided through Practice Decodable Story 13: “Fluff,”which reinforces the lesson’s phonics focus and supports continued fluency development. 

    • In Unit 3, Lesson 2, Day 4, Fluency, Reading a Decodable Story, fluency instruction in this lesson integrates multiple routines and supports, including Routine 9: Reading a Decodable Story, Partner Rereading, and Differentiated Practice Decodable texts. After reading “Granddaddy Spider” several times for expression, students apply their learning to Practice Decodable Story 30: “Missy’s Next Story,” which reinforces the /ē/ spelling patterns introduced in the unit. Comprehension checks ensure that students are reading for both fluency and understanding, while ongoing opportunities for partner reading and modeled practice provide consistent fluency support throughout the year.

Indicator 1t

4 / 4

Varied and frequent opportunities are built into the materials for students to engage in supported practice to gain automaticity and prosody beginning in mid-Grade 1 and through Grade 2 (once accuracy is secure).

  • Varied, frequent opportunities are provided over the course of the year for students to gain automaticity and prosody in connected text, aligned to program expectations and developmental readiness.

  • Materials provide practice opportunities for oral reading fluency in a variety of settings (e.g.,  repeated readings, dyad or partner reading, continuous reading), with sufficient frequency to support progress towards mastery. 

  • Materials include teacher-facing guidance on modeling fluent reading and delivering corrective feedback that supports students’ growth in rate, expression, and phrasing.

The instructional opportunities for supported fluency practice in Open Court meet the expectations for Indicator 1t. Materials provide varied and frequent opportunities for students to build automaticity and prosody through repeated readings of connected, decodable texts across the year. Instruction consistently incorporates Routine 9 for reading decodable stories, with explicit prompts to attend to rate, accuracy, phrasing, and expression. Students practice fluency through whole-group modeling, echo reading, partner rereading, and small-group application, with purposeful rereading embedded in each routine. Teacher guidance includes clear modeling language, direction for setting a reading purpose, and feedback cues for monitoring rate, accuracy, and expression. Additional practice through differentiated decodables extends fluency development in new yet controlled texts. Together, these routines provide sustained, developmentally appropriate support for students’ growth in fluent, expressive reading.

Note: This indicator is analyzed at the lesson level to examine the instructional progression within and across lessons. Repeated references to a single week or lesson reflect the structured sequence of explicit instruction and guided practice, which is representative of how the materials support this skill throughout the year.

  • Varied, frequent opportunities are provided over the course of the year for students to gain automaticity and prosody in connected text, aligned to program expectations and developmental readiness. 

    • In Unit 4, Lesson 3, Day 2, Fluency: Reading a Decodable, materials include structured fluency instruction using Book 5, Story 40: “The Kitten’s Rescue.” Students practice reading connected decodable text with new high-frequency words (quite, today) and review words (are, their). Using Routine 9: Reading a Decodable Story, the teacher prompts students to establish a clear purpose for reading (“I’m reading this story to practice reading words with the sound/spellings and high-frequency words I’ve learned so far”) and to monitor comprehension through self-checking and rereading. Instruction explicitly directs students to “concentrate on reading this story with the correct rate,” supporting both automaticity and prosody development. This focus on purpose, pacing, and comprehension provides systematic opportunities for students to strengthen fluent, expressive reading within connected text.

    • In Unit 6, Lesson 1, Day 2, Fluency: Reading a Decodable Story, materials provide explicit fluency practice using Book 7, Story 50: “Little Havana in Miami.” Students read connected, decodable text that integrates new and review high-frequency words (brought, are, into, one, their) and focuses on the ough spelling pattern. The teacher introduces several nondecodable story words (America, Miami, Domino, dominoes) to ensure accessibility before reading. Students are guided to set a purpose for reading (“to practice reading words with the ough sound/spelling”) and to monitor comprehension by checking their understanding after reading. The lesson explicitly emphasizes fluency rate, instructing students to “focus on their rate as they read” and to use context clues for accuracy and self-correction. 

  • Materials provide practice opportunities for ward reading fluency in a variety of settings (e.g., repeated readings, dyad or partner reading, continuous reading), with sufficient frequency to support progress towards mastery. 

    • In Unit 5, Lesson 3, Day 5, Fluency, students read Book 6, Story 46 A Plant That Acts Like an Animal aloud within small groups, applying previously learned phonics and high-frequency word patterns to develop automaticity. 

    • In Unit 6, Lesson 1, Day 2, Fluency: Reading a Decodable Story, Book 7, Story 50: Little Havana in Miami, fluency practice includes partner rereading. Students read and reread the story aloud several times, alternating pages with a partner while focusing on reading at an appropriate speed and confirming accuracy. The teacher monitors for rate, accuracy, and expression during these readings, providing feedback and support as needed. The Differentiated Instruction section offers additional fluency practice through Practice Decodable Story 50: Nancy’s Tryout, reinforcing the ough spelling pattern and fluency skills in a new text. 

  • Materials include teacher-facing guidance on modeling fluent reading and delivering corrective feedback that supports students’ growth in rate, expression, and phrasing. 

    • In Unit 4, Lesson 3, Day 2, Fluency: Reading a Decodable, the teacher is  instructed to set a clear reading purpose, model fluent reading through Routine 9, and guide students to concentrate on rate and understanding. The materials provide prompts for monitoring (“Check students’ reading for an appropriate speed”) and comprehension questions that require students to locate evidence in the text, reinforcing meaningful rereading. The accompanying Differentiated Instruction guidance further supports the teacher in extending fluency instruction through additional decodable practice.

    • In Unit 5, Lesson 6, Day 3, Fluency, the teacher is instructed to “demonstrate by reading aloud the following sentences from ‘Fossils,’” first breaking sentences unnaturally (“They are the/fossilized bones of/the whole/dinosaur…”) and then rereading with proper phrasing (“They are the fossilized bones/of the whole dinosaur…”). The guidance explains why phrasing improves fluency—because it “makes reading sound natural and creates a pleasing rhythm that helps listeners make sense of the text.” The teacher is also directed to have students practice reading aloud to themselves to apply the modeled phrasing. This explicit modeling and feedback framework ensures the teacher can effectively guide students’ growth in expression, phrasing, and natural prosody.

Indicator 1u

2 / 4

Materials regularly and systematically offer assessment opportunities that measure student progress in oral reading fluency (as indicated by the program scope and sequence). 

  • Multiple assessment opportunities are provided regularly and systematically over the course of the year for students to demonstrate progress toward mastery and independence of oral reading fluency.

  • Assessment materials provide the teacher–and, when appropriate, caregivers–with information about students’ current skills/levels in rate, accuracy, and prosody.

  • Materials support the teacher with instructional adjustments to help students make progress toward mastery and include guidance aligned to developmentally appropriate fluency benchmarks (e.g., WCPM, prosody rubrics, or progress-monitoring targets).

The assessment materials for oral reading fluency in Open Court Reading partially meet the expectations for Indicator 1u. Materials provide regular and systematic opportunities to measure fluency across the year, including unit-based Oral Reading Fluency assessments and benchmark administrations that track Words Correct per Minute, accuracy, and prosody. These assessments offer clear performance expectations and generate consistent data for monitoring progress over time. Materials also provide the teacher with information about students’ current fluency development through quantitative scores and qualitative prosody indicators. However, guidance for instructional adjustments is limited. Recommendations focus primarily on rereading or switching to simpler texts, without specifying instructional moves that support modeling, prompting, or targeted reteaching. As a result, assessments effectively measure fluency but offer only minimal support for using results to strengthen students’ accuracy, rate, and expression.

  • Multiple assessment opportunities are provided regularly and systematically over the course of the year for students to demonstrate progress toward mastery and independence of oral reading fluency. 

    • According to the Assessment Handbook, oral reading fluency for Grade 2 is measured through individually administered Oral Reading Fluency passages that occur at the end of every unit, ensuring regular and systematic assessment throughout the year. Each Oral Reading Fluency assessment measures Words Correct per Minute (WCPM), providing quantitative data for student performance and rate of improvement.

    • According to the Benchmark Assessment Guide, Grade 2 materials include three formal oral reading fluency evaluations administered at consistent intervals throughout the year—after Unit 1 (Week 6), Unit 3 (Week 18), and Unit 6 (Week 34)—providing multiple, systematic opportunities for students to demonstrate growth in fluency and automaticity.

      • Benchmark Test 1, administered after Unit 1, includes an individually administered Oral Fluency Passage Reading task that serves as a baseline measure of rate, accuracy, and expression. The passage, “As she walked home from school, Maria saw her science teacher…”, is a 138-word selection at Lexile 560L with a mean sentence length of 9.86. Students read aloud for one minute while the teacher records errors and notes qualitative fluency behaviors on the Oral Fluency Student Record form. The teacher calculates Words Correct per Minute (WCPM), determines the accuracy rate, and evaluates qualitative prosody features—including decoding ability, pace, syntax, self-correction, and intonation—using a Low / Average / High scale. Scoring codes and conventions are clearly defined:

        • ( / ) marks misread words

        • ( ^ ) indicates insertions

        • ( ]) marks the final word read in one minute

        • Arrows indicate reversed word order

  • Assessment materials provide the teacher and students with information about students’ current skills/level of understanding of oral reading fluency. 

    • According to the Assessment Handbook, each Oral Reading Fluency assessment provides the teacher with direct, individualized data on students’ reading rate, accuracy, and overall oral reading competence. The teacher administers the fluency passages one-on-one, timing students as they read aloud from connected text. The materials direct the teacher to make note of students’ recurring reading issues, such as decoding errors, hesitations, or difficulties with automatic word recognition, as well as their ability to use context to self-correct or clarify meaning. The teacher is  encouraged to record students’ WCPM scores and to monitor their progress from unit to unit using the performance expectations chart. These data provide immediate insight into each student’s fluency proficiency and guide next instructional steps.

      • The handbook provides clearly defined unit-by-unit cutoff expectations—Unit 1: 84 WCPM, Unit 2: 92 WCPM, Unit 3: 100 WCPM, Unit 4: 109 WCPM, Unit 5: 116 WCPM, and Unit 6: 124 WCPM—which serve as benchmarks for grade-level fluency development. Students falling below these cutoffs are identified for additional intervention, ensuring ongoing monitoring and instructional response. 

  • Materials support the teacher with limited instructional adjustments to help students make progress toward mastery in oral reading fluency. 

    • According to the Assessment Handbook, the materials  include guidance for instructional adjustments based on fluency performance. If a student struggles to read a decodable or anthology selection fluently, the teacher is directed to:

      • Have the student reread the same story multiple times independently before reassessment.

      • If difficulties persist, “drop back two Decodable Stories” to a simpler level and then gradually move forward as the student improves.

      • Reassess using alternate stories to confirm fluency gains. These procedures provide a built-in system for reteaching and differentiation. The handbook also recommends timing students’ oral reading periodically during Workshop or partner reading to ensure progress is sustained between formal assessments. 

      The materials present rereading or switching texts as the primary response to student needs, but they do not provide actionable instructional moves for the teacher. Guidance does not specify what the teacher should model, prompt, or reteach in order to adjust instruction based on students’ fluency challenges.