K-2nd Grade - Gateway 1
Back to K-2nd Grade Overview
Note on review tool versions
See the series overview page to confirm the review tool version used to create this report.
- Our current review tool version is 2.0. Learn more
- Reports conducted using earlier review tools (v1.0 and v1.5) contain valuable insights but may not fully align with our current instructional priorities. Read our guide to using earlier reports and review tools
Loading navigation...
Gateway Ratings Summary
Alignment to Research-Based Practices
Alignment to Research-Based Practices and Standards for Foundational Skills InstructionGateway 1 (Kindergarten) - Partially Meets Expectations | 80% |
|---|---|
Criterion 1.1: Alphabet Knowledge | 9 / 10 |
Criterion 1.2: Phonemic Awareness | 12 / 16 |
Criterion 1.3: Phonics (Decoding and Encoding) | 28 / 32 |
Criterion 1.4: Word Recognition and Word Analysis | 7 / 12 |
The Open Court Reading materials partially meet expectations for Gateway 1 in Kindergarten by providing a coherent, research-based progression of foundational literacy skills through explicit instruction, repeated teacher modeling, and consistent instructional routines. Instruction systematically builds from alphabet knowledge and phonemic awareness into early phonics, high-frequency word recognition, and introductory word analysis, with cumulative practice embedded across lessons to support accuracy and automaticity. Students engage in regular opportunities to practice letter–sound correspondences, phoneme manipulation, decoding and encoding of taught phonics patterns, handwriting, and reading aligned decodable texts. Assessments occur regularly and align to the scope and sequence, providing information about student performance in letter knowledge, phonemic awareness, phonics, and word recognition. However, limitations remain in the depth and consistency of instruction and assessment use across components. Phonemic awareness instruction does not consistently require full phoneme-level application across all tasks, guidance for task-specific corrective feedback and assessment-based instructional adjustment is limited, and explicit instruction in syllabication, morpheme analysis, and analysis of high-frequency word spellings is concentrated late in the year and not systematically distributed. Overall, the materials provide strong, explicit foundational skills instruction aligned to research-based practices, with some limitations in instructional depth, feedback, and assessment use that affect the consistency of targeted support across the Kindergarten year.
Criterion 1.1: Alphabet Knowledge
This criterion is non-negotiable. Materials must achieve a specified minimum score in this criterion to advance to the next gateway.
Materials and instruction provide systematic and explicit instruction and practice for letter recognition.
The Open Court Reading materials meet expectations for Criterion 1.1 by providing systematic and explicit instruction in letter names, letter sounds, and letter formation aligned to a clear, yearlong scope and sequence. Instruction introduces all 26 uppercase and lowercase letters with explicit teacher modeling and frequent, cumulative opportunities for student practice in recognition, sound production, and handwriting. Assessments aligned to the scope and sequence occur regularly and provide teachers with information about student progress in letter recognition and formation; however, guidance for using assessment results to inform whole-group instructional adjustments is limited and primarily focused on small-group or intervention settings.
Indicator 1a
Alphabet Knowledge
Indicator 1a.i
Materials provide systematic and explicit instruction in letter names and their corresponding sounds.
There is a defined sequence for letter recognition instruction to be completed in a reasonable time frame over the school year.
Materials contain isolated, systematic, and explicit instruction for students to recognize all 26 lowercase and uppercase letters.
The letter names and sounds instruction in Open Court Reading meets expectations for Indicator 1a.i. The Teacher Resources, Scope and Sequence for Sound and Spelling Instruction provides a defined and systematic sequence for introducing letter names and their corresponding sounds across the Kindergarten year. Beginning in Unit 3, instruction follows a planned progression in which new letter-sound correspondences are introduced in a deliberate order. This sequence continues through Units 3–9 and is designed to be completed within a reasonable time frame over the school year. Materials also include isolated, systematic, and explicit instruction for students to recognize all 26 uppercase and lowercase letters, with dedicated lessons that support letter recognition across the year.
There is a defined sequence for letter recognition instruction to be completed in a reasonable time frame over the school year.
In the Teacher Resources, Scope and Sequence for Sound and Spelling Instruction, beginning in Unit 3, the materials provide a defined sequence for introducing letter names and their corresponding sounds across the Kindergarten year. Instruction introduces new letter-sound correspondences in a planned order, with focused practice on initial and final sound positions, embedded review of previously taught letters, and cumulative application through aligned pre-decodable and decodable texts. This sequence continues through Units 3–9 and is designed to be completed within the school year.
The sequence begins in Unit 3 with early consonants and a short vowel and gradually expands to include additional consonants, short vowels, consonant spellings, and long vowel patterns. For example:
Unit 3 introduces s, m, d, p, and short a, with instruction moving from initial to final sound positions and including cumulative review of previously taught letters and sounds.
Unit 4 introduces h, t, n, l, and short i, with continued review and application in decodable texts.
Unit 5 introduces b, k spelled c, short o, and r, with cumulative review and expanded decoding practice.
Unit 6 introduces g, j, f, and short u, with review of previously taught sounds and spellings.
Unit 7 introduces w, k spelled k, and z spelled z and s, with cumulative review of consonants and vowels.
Unit 8 introduces long vowel patterns, including long a, long i, and long o, with instruction on initial and medial vowel positions.
Unit 9 introduces long u and long e, along with contrast lessons comparing short and long vowel sounds.
Each new letter-sound correspondence is introduced using a consistent instructional routine that explicitly connects the letter name to its sound. For example, in Unit 3, Lesson 1, Day 1, the materials direct the teacher to introduce the letter Ss using the Introducing Sounds and Letters Routine. The teacher displays the Alphabet Sound Card Ss (upper and lowercase letter), names the letter, and states the sound of the letter, explicitly modeling the connection between the letter name and its sound
Materials contain isolated, systematic, and explicit instruction for students to recognize all 26 lowercase and uppercase letters.
In Unit 1, Lesson 1, Day 1, Letter names Aa and Bb, the teacher displays the front side of the alphabet sound cards Aa and Bb and uses the Lion Puppet to engage students in repeating the names. Students identify A and B in their own name necklaces and distinguish between capital and lowercase forms.
In Unit 1, Lesson 2, Day 1, Letter Names Ii and Jj, the teacher displays Alphabet Sound Cards Ii and Jj and directs students’ attention to identifying each letter. The lesson includes guidance for distinguishing vowels by color coding (e.g., red for vowels) and prompts students to recall other vowels already learned. The teacher writes names on the board (e.g., Jillian, Isabella, Ian, Timmy, Benjamin) and asks students to locate uppercase and lowercase i and j within the words.
Indicator 1a.ii
Materials provide opportunities for student practice in letter names and their corresponding sounds.
Materials include sufficient practice opportunities for students to recognize all 26 lowercase and uppercase letters accurately and automatically.
Materials incorporate a variety of activities and resources for students to develop, practice, and reinforce (through cumulative review) alphabet knowledge.
The student practice opportunities for letter names and their corresponding sounds in Open Court Reading meet expectations for Indicator 1a.ii. Materials provide consistent opportunities for students to practice recognizing all 26 uppercase and lowercase letters with accuracy and automaticity. Instruction incorporates a variety of activities and resources, and cumulative review is embedded throughout lessons to reinforce and apply alphabet knowledge across contexts.
Materials include sufficient practice opportunities for students to recognize all 26 lowercase and uppercase letters accurately and automatically.
In Unit 1, Lesson 1, Day 3, Letter Names, Ee and Ff, students sing the “Alphabet Song” with the Lion Puppet to identify the target letter E, then are asked to provide the name of F. Teachers direct students to compare uppercase and lowercase forms, identifying similarities and differences between E and F, and locate capital and lowercase forms in a set of names written on the board (e.g., Faith, Eduardo, Hailey, Sofia, Fred).
In Unit 1, Lesson 1, Day 4, Letter Names, Gg and Hh, students sing the “Alphabet Song,” pausing at designated letters, then use the “Sing Your Way to H” game with the Lion Puppet to identify Gg and Hh. Teachers display Alphabet Sound Cards Gg and Hh and prompt students to name both the uppercase and lowercase forms. Students locate capital and lowercase G and H in a list of names written on the board (e.g., Gabriella, Angela, Henry, Greg, Ethan).
Materials incorporate a variety of activities and resources for students to develop, practice, and reinforce (through cumulative review) alphabet knowledge.
In Unit 0: Getting Started, Day 10, The Alphabet, students recall letters they already know while the teacher points to Alphabet Sound Cards, sing the “Alphabet Song” while tracking the cards, and participate in a “Word Tour” to identify letters in environmental print (e.g., Exit, Library, Office).
In Unit 1, Lesson 1, Day 5, Reviewing Letter Names, Aa-Hh, students sing the “Alphabet Song” while pointing to each letter, play the “Sing Your Way to H” game using Alphabet Sound Cards, and use the Lion Puppet to locate matching letters around the classroom. Differentiated activities extend practice opportunities, including worksheets with scattered uppercase and lowercase letters (approaching level), matching uppercase and lowercase Letter Cards (on level), and sequencing Letter Cards Aa-Hh on an Individual Pocket Chart (beyond level).
Indicator 1a.iii
Materials provide explicit instruction and teacher modeling in printing and forming the 26 letters (uppercase and lowercase).
There is a defined sequence for letter formation, aligned to the scope and sequence of letter recognition, to be completed in a reasonable time frame over the school year.
Materials include clear directions for the teacher concerning how to explain and model how to correctly form each of the 26 letters (uppercase and lowercase).
Materials include teacher guidance for corrective feedback when needed for students.
The instruction and teacher modeling for letter formation Open Court Reading meet the expectations for Indicator 1a.iii. The Kindergarten Handwriting Scope and Sequence includes a defined plan for introducing and reviewing all 26 uppercase and lowercase letters across Units 1-9, aligned with the letter recognition sequence. Penmanship and handwriting lessons occur on Day 1 of each lesson, with review days that provide cumulative practice of previously taught letters. Teacher materials provide clear, step-by-step directions for modeling correct letter formation, including descriptions of starting points and stroke directions, with repeated opportunities for students to observe, practice, and review each letter.
There is a defined sequence for letter formation, aligned to the scope and sequence of letter recognition, to be completed in a reasonable time frame over the school year.
The Unit 1 Scope and Sequence provides a day-by-day, sequenced plan for teaching the formation of all uppercase and lowercase letters (A-Z). The sequence is as follows:
Units 1-2 - Letter Names and Shapes and Penmanship/Handwriting Lessons introduce and review all 26 uppercase and lowercase letters in sets of two to three at a time, with review days after each set (e.g., Review Aa-Hh, Review Aa-Pp, Review Aa-Zz)
Units 3-6 - Penmanship/Handwriting lessons connect letter formation to sound-spelling instruction. Students practice forming letters in relation to initial and medial positions of sounds (e.g., Ss, Mm, Dd, Pp, Aa, Hh, Tt, Nn, Ll, Ii, Bb, Cc, Rr, Gg, Jj, Ff, Uu, Xx, Zz) with review days that provide cumulative practice of multiple previously taught letters. Penmanship and handwriting lessons occur on Day 1 of each lesson and align to the scope and sequence by connecting letter formation to sound-spelling instruction.
Units 7-9 - Lesson continue handwriting practice with additional letters and sounds (e.g., Ww, Kk, Yy, Oo, Uu, Ee) and extend practice to initial, medial, and contrast activities, with review lessons that revisit and reinforce groups of letters and sounds. Penmanship and handwriting lessons occur on Day 1 of each lesson and align to the scope and sequence by connecting letter formation to sound-spelling instruction.
All 26 uppercase and lowercase letters are introduced, practiced, and reviewed through a defined sequence across Units 1-9.
Materials include clear directions for the teacher concerning how to explain and model how to correctly form each of the 26 letters (uppercase and lowercase).
In Unit 1, Lesson 1, Day 3, Letter Shapes, the teacher points to the alphabet sound cards Ee and Ff and displays ball-and-stick models of the letters. The teacher is directed to trace uppercase E while saying, “Start at the top, and go down to make a vertical line. Start here, and go straight across to make a horizontal line (right). Start here, and make a horizontal line (right). Start here, and make a horizontal line (right). Uppercase E.” Teachers repeat the steps for lowercase e, saying, “Start here, and go straight out (right). Then go around like this (left). Lowercase e.” Teachers also model formation of uppercase and lowercase f, using stroke-by-stroke directions.
In Unit 3, Lesson 1, Day 3, Penmanship/Handwriting, the teacher models the formation of uppercase M by saying, “Begin here and make a vertical line. Now start here, and draw a diagonal line down right. Next, slant back up to the right. Then draw a vertical line. Uppercase M.” The teacher then models the formation of lowercase m. As students write, the teacher circulates and observes students who may need help with letter formation, and has students circle the best examples of their uppercase and lowercase m for additional review.
Indicator 1a.iv
Materials provide opportunities for student practice in printing and forming the 26 letters (uppercase and lowercase).
Materials include frequent opportunities for students to practice forming all of the 26 uppercase and lowercase letters.
Materials include cumulative review of previously learned letter formation.
The student practice opportunities for letter formation in Open Court Reading meet expectations for Indicator 1a.iv. The materials provide frequent opportunities for students to practice printing all 26 uppercase and lowercase letters through tracing, air formation, and handwriting routines. Cumulative review is embedded across units, with lessons revisiting previously taught letters and providing structured practice and self-correction activities to reinforce accuracy and automaticity.
Materials include frequent opportunities for students to practice forming all of the 26 uppercase and lowercase letters.
In Unit 1, Lesson 2, Day 2, Letter Shapes, students trace uppercase K and lowercase k in the air several times as the teacher models each stroke. Students also trace the formation of Ll in the air following teacher guidance.
In Unit 3, Lesson 1, Day 1, Penmanship/Handwriting, students practice writing the capital S on the top line of their paper or board from left to right. Students then practice writing the lowercase s multiple times on the next line, saying the /s/ sound aloud as they form each letter.
Materials include cumulative review of previously learned letter formation.
In Unit 1, Lesson 1, Day 5, Reviewing Letter Shapes, students review and practice all uppercase and lowercase letters Aa-Hh through tracing on the board and completing the Skills Practice 1 activities that require circling and writing letters within a picture scene.
In Unit 5, Lesson 1, Day 3, Penmanship/Handwriting, students practice forming uppercase C and lowercase c by writing rows of each letter on their paper or board. After completing the rows, students are directed to proofread their work, circling one uppercase C and one lowercase c that they would like to improve, and then rewrite them. Because the letter C/c was first introduced in Unit 1 during the Letter Shapes lessons, the handwriting practice in Unit 5, Lesson 1, Day 3 represents cumulative review of previously taught letter formation.
Indicator 1b
Materials regularly and systematically offer assessment opportunities that measure student progress through mastery of letter recognition and printing letters (as indicated by the program scope and sequence).
Materials regularly and systematically provide a variety of assessment opportunities over the course of the year to demonstrate students’ progress toward mastery and independence of letter recognition and letter formation.
Assessment materials provide teachers and students with information concerning students’ current skills/level of understanding of letter recognition and letter formation.
Materials support teachers with instructional suggestions for assessment-based steps to help students to progress toward mastery in letter recognition and letter formation.
The assessment opportunities in Open Court Reading for letter recognition and letter formation partially meet expectations for Indicator 1b. Materials include regular and systematic assessments that appear at multiple points in the year, including lesson, unit, and benchmark formats, and these provide teachers with information on student progress in naming and forming letters. However, instructional suggestions based on assessment results are limited to small-group or intervention activities, with little guidance provided for whole-group instructional adjustments.
Materials regularly and systematically provide a variety of assessment opportunities over the course of the year to demonstrate students’ progress toward mastery and independence of letter recognition, and letter formation.
In the Benchmark Assessment Guide, the Benchmark Assessment includes three evaluations administered at multiple points across the year: after Unit 2, after Unit 5, and at the end of Unit 12. Each benchmark includes sections for Letter Recognition and Letter Sounds to measure student progress in naming and identifying the sounds of uppercase and lowercase letters.
In the Lesson and Unit Assessments, Book 1: Blackline Masters with Answer Key, the Lesson and Unit Assessment includes frequent checks of letter recognition. For example, the Letter Recognition Assessment in Unit 1, Lesson 1 directs the teacher to administer a page featuring eight or thirteen letters.
According to the Assessment Handbook, students are assessed on letter recognition and formation at least twice in each unit.
Assessment materials provide teachers and students with information concerning students’ current skills/level of understanding of letter recognition, and letter formation.
In the Benchmark Assessment Guide, Letter Recognition, the teacher is directed to point to letters on the assessment page and ask students to name the letter and identify whether it is uppercase and lowercase. The teacher records results by circling letters a student incorrectly identifies and by noting strengths, weaknesses, and self-corrections.
In the Lesson and Unit Assessments, Book 1: Blackline Masters with Answer Key, Unit 1, Lesson 1, Letter Recognition, the teacher is directed to show students a page of letters, have them read the letters aloud from left to right, and record results on the students’ copy. The teacher marks the total number correct at the bottom of the page. The materials note that 6 out of 8 or 10 out of 13 correct responses are acceptable.
Materials support teachers with some instructional suggestions for assessment-based steps to help students to progress towards mastery in letter recognition, and letter formation.
In the Lesson and Unit Assessments, Book 1: Blackline Masters with Answer Key-Letter Recognition, the teacher is directed to administer the assessment individually by sitting beside the student at a table and ensuring the correct page is used. The teacher is told to point to a letter at random and prompt the student by saying, “Which letter is this?” or “What is the name of this letter?” The teacher records results by circling letters named correctly, marking an X over incorrect responses, and adding a question mark if the student hesitates or self-corrects.
The assessment includes guidance to discontinue if the student makes five errors in a row and to retest the student on any uncertain or incorrect letters after at least one other letter has been tested. The teacher then records totals for correct, incorrect, and uncertain responses on the student assessment record and the class assessment record. If students do not meet the recommended performance level, the teacher is instructed to repeat the assessment after additional intervention or instruction.
The Intervention Teacher’s Guide also provides support for students scoring below 70 percent, such as targeted letter card matching, letter writing, and independent practice activities.
In Unit 1, Lesson 1, Day, the Intervention Guide - Alphabetic Knowledge: Reviewing Letter Names (Aa - Hh), the teacher uses Alphabet Sound Cards Aa-Hh in random order, prompting students to name each letter, followed by targeted practice using Intervention Support pages.
While the materials provide regular and systematic assessment opportunities that measure student progress in letter recognition and formation, instructional suggestions based on assessment results are limited. Guidance primarily addresses small-group or intervention activities, with little support for whole-group instructional adjustments or broader decision-making after the assessments are administered.
Criterion 1.2: Phonemic Awareness
This criterion is non-negotiable. Materials must achieve a specified minimum score in this criterion to advance to the next gateway.
Materials emphasize explicit, systematic instruction of research-based and/or evidence-based phonemic awareness.
The Open Court Reading materials partially meet expectations for Criterion 1.2 by providing a clearly articulated, research-based scope and sequence for phonemic awareness that progresses from simpler to more complex phoneme-level skills. Instruction is systematic and explicitly modeled through daily lessons that address phoneme isolation, blending, segmentation, and manipulation, and routines are generally aligned to the phonics scope and sequence. Materials include regular assessment opportunities with defined mastery thresholds and tools for tracking student progress.
However, daily instruction does not consistently require students to blend or segment individual phonemes across all tasks. Many blending routines emphasize combining an initial phoneme with a larger word part rather than full phoneme-by-phoneme blending, limiting consistent practice with advanced phonemic awareness skills. In addition, while assessments occur regularly, materials provide limited guidance for using assessment results to differentiate instruction or implement targeted intervention. Overall, phonemic awareness instruction is systematic but does not consistently support full phoneme-level application or instructional adjustment across the year.
Indicator 1c
Scope and sequence clearly delineate the sequence in which phonemic awareness skills are to be taught, with a clear, evidence-based explanation for the expected hierarchy of phonemic awareness competence.
Materials contain a clear, evidence-based explanation for the expected sequence for teaching phonemic awareness skills.
Materials have a cohesive sequence of phonemic awareness instruction based on the expected hierarchy to build toward students’ immediate application of the skills.
Materials prioritize phonemic awareness instruction (isolation, blending, segmenting, manipulation) and introduce phonological sensitivity tasks (e.g., rhyming, syllables, onset-rime) only briefly and early in Kindergarten.
Materials contain a phonemic awareness sequence of instruction and practice aligned to the phonics scope and sequence.
The phonemic awareness scope and sequence in Open Court Reading meet the expectations for Indicator 1c. The materials contain a clear, research-based sequence for teaching phonemic awareness that progresses from broader phonological skills to more complex phoneme-level tasks. The scope and sequence follows a cohesive hierarchy grounded in evidence-based research and aligns to phonics instruction across units. Instruction focuses on phoneme-level awareness, with limited emphasis on broader phonological activities after the first two units.
Materials contain a clear, evidence-based explanation for the expected sequence for teaching phonemic awareness skills.
In Teacher Resources, Research, The Science of Reading in Open Court Reading, the research summary cites Shaywitz (2003), Stanovich (1986), and NICHD (2000), noting that phonemic awareness is initially taught as an oral skill, and that combining this instruction with letter-sound correspondences strengthens reading and spelling for all students, including English Learners and students with disabilities. It also highlights blending and segmentation as critical early literacy skills and recommends brief, explicit instruction aligned to a developmental progression (Snow, Burns & Griffin, 1998; Mott & Rutherford, 2012).
In the Teacher Resources, Program Overview, Phonological and Phonemic Awareness sections, the materials explain that the key to learning to read is identifying sounds and connecting them to letters. Instruction begins with larger phonological units such as sentences, words, rhymes, and syllables, and then progresses to phoneme-level skills including oral blending, segmentation, deletion, and substitution.
Materials have a cohesive sequence of phonemic awareness instruction based on the expected hierarchy to build toward students’ immediate application of the skills.
According to the Scope and Sequence, Phonological and Phonemic Awareness, the materials provide a daily progression of instruction that begins with broad phonological sensitivity tasks and advances to more complex phonemic awareness skills. The sequence across Units 1-12 includes:
Units 1-2 - Students begin with phonological skills such as listening for sounds, rhyming, identifying words in spoken sentences, and blending/segmenting syllables.
Units 3-4 - Instruction introduces early phoneme-level tasks, including matching, blending, and segmenting initial and final consonant sounds, while continuing rhyme and syllable review.
Units 5-6 - Lessons expand phoneme segmentation and manipulation with initial and final sounds, onset-rime blending, and continued practice with phoneme matching and restoration.
Units 7-8 - Instruction provides increased practice in phoneme segmentation, matching, and manipulation of initial, final, and medial sounds, as well as distinguishing vowel sounds.
Units 9-10 - Students engage in more complex phonemic awareness skills, including substitution, deletion, and addition of phonemes in initial, medial, and final positions, while reviewing earlier skills cumulatively.
Units 11-12 - The sequence culminates with frequent opportunities for phoneme substitution, deletion, and addition across initial, medial, and final positions, along with oral language extensions and review of blending and segmentation skills.
Materials attend to developing phonemic awareness skills and avoid spending excess time on phonological sensitivity tasks.
According to the Scope and Sequence, Phonological and Phonemic Awareness, the materials introduce phonological sensitivity tasks such as rhyming, listening for sounds, and identifying words in spoken sentences mainly in Units 1-2.
Beginning in Unit 3, the focus shifts toward phonemic awareness skills including phoneme matching, blending, and segmentation with initial and final sounds.
From Units 5-12, instruction continues to emphasize phoneme-level skills such as blending and segmentation across initial, medial, and final positions, with occasional opportunities for students to apply manipulation tasks (for example, substituting or deleting a phoneme) as brief extensions of core instruction. Phonological awareness tasks, such as rhyming or syllable identification, appear only as short warm-ups (for example, Unit 7, Lesson 1, Day 4, includes a phonological awareness warm-up labeled Phoneme Blending, Initial Sounds, which still provides practice at the phoneme level).
This evidence shows that while phonological awareness tasks occasionally reappear as brief warm-ups later in the year, the materials devote the majority of instructional time to phoneme-level skills, particularly blending and segmentation, avoiding excess time on broader phonological tasks.
Materials contain a phonemic awareness sequence of instruction and practice aligned to the phonics scope and sequence.
In Unit 3, Lesson 1, Day 1 - Phonological Awareness: Oral Blending (Onset and Rime), students practice blending individual sounds to form words (e.g., Teacher: /s/; Puppet: ad; Students: sad). On the same day, the phonics lesson, Alphabetic Principle: Introducing the Sound of Ss.
In Unit 6, Lesson 3, Day 1, Phonemic Awareness, Phoneme Matching (Final Sounds), students listen to three spoken words (e.g., crab, wave, rub) and identify the two that end with the same sound (e.g., crab, rub). On the same day, the phonics lesson Alphabetic Principle: Introducing the Sound of Zz.
This evidence shows that phonemic awareness activities are directly paired with the introduction of specific letters and sounds in phonics lessons. The sequence demonstrates alignment between phonemic awareness practice and the phonics scope and sequence across the year.
Indicator 1d
Materials include systematic and explicit instruction in phonemic awareness with repeated teacher modeling.
Materials include systematic, explicit instruction in sounds (phonemes).
Materials provide the teacher with examples for instruction in sounds (phonemes).
Materials include teacher guidance for corrective feedback when needed for students.
The phonemic awareness instruction in Open Court Reading meets the expectations for Indicator 1d. The materials include systematic, explicit instruction in phonemic awareness through daily lessons with consistent routines and repeated teacher modeling. Lessons provide clear examples for instruction. Instruction is cumulative and structured, progressing from initial to final sound blending and segmentation. Materials also include teacher guidance for corrective feedback, with prompts to model the correct sound, have students repeat it, and blend the word again.
Note: This indicator is analyzed at the lesson level to examine the instructional progression within and across lessons. Repeated references to a single week or lesson reflect the structured sequence of explicit instruction and guided practice, which is representative of how the materials support this skill throughout the year.
Materials include systematic, explicit instruction in sounds (phonemes).
In Unit 3, Lesson 2, Day 3, Phoneme Blending, Final Sounds, the teacher introduces a blending game by telling students that the Lion Puppet will say all but the last sound of a word, and the teacher will add the final sound. The teacher models with the example bluebir… + /d/ = bluebird.
In Unit 10, Lesson 3, Day 2, Phonemic Awareness, the teacher tells students that they will add a sound to a word to make a new word and reviews the procedure before beginning the activity. The teacher says the word pot and students repeat the word. The puppet prompts students to add l between p and o to form plot. The lesson continues with a sequenced set of examples that progressively apply the same phoneme addition routine. Students change sip by adding k between s and i to form skip. Students change dip by adding r between d and i to form drip. Students change bet by adding s between e and t to form best. Additional examples include forming pest from pet, guest from get, vest from vet, slow from so, blow from Bo, clap from cap, and frame from fame. Each example uses a consistent routine that supports explicit instruction in adding phonemes to change words.
Materials provide the teacher with examples for instruction in sounds (phonemes).
In Unit 3, Lesson 2, Day 3, Phoneme Blending: Final Sounds, the materials supply a teacher script and word list for phoneme blending with final sounds (e.g., bluebird, dad, friend, keyboard).
In Unit 10, Lesson 3, Day 2, the materials supply numerous teacher-facing examples that guide phoneme addition instruction. The teacher models how to form a new word by adding a phoneme before students attempt additional examples. The sequence of words such as pot to plot, sip to skip, and dip to drip provides clear demonstrations of how to add a sound within a word. The teacher tells students that the puppet is not saying the last sound of his words and prompts them to supply the missing phoneme. When the puppet says daydrea, students identify the missing m and state the word daydream.
Materials include teacher guidance for corrective feedback when needed for students.
In Unit 4, Lesson 2, Day 4, Phoneme Blending: Initial Sounds, a Teacher Tip provides explicit corrective feedback guidance: if a student misses a sound, the teacher should model the correct phoneme, have students repeat it, and then blend the word again together.
In Unit 5, Lesson 3, Day 5, Phoneme Segmentation, the Teacher Tip offers explicit corrective feedback steps: “Provide feedback for students who need additional support with phoneme segmentation. Repeat the word phoneme by phoneme. Use your fingers to count the phonemes as you say each one. Say, “How many sounds does the word have? Three. The word has three sounds.’ Say each phoneme again and then say the complete word. Have students repeat after you.”
Indicator 1e
Materials include daily, brief lessons in phonemic awareness.
Daily phonemic awareness instruction aligns to the scope and sequence, progressing from isolation, blending, and segmenting to more advanced phoneme manipulations, with phoneme-grapheme correspondences introduced to connect sounds to letters.
Materials include opportunities for students to practice connecting sounds to letters.
Materials include directions to the teacher for demonstrating how to pronounce each phoneme (articulation/mouth formation).
The daily phonemic awareness lessons in Open Court Reading partially meet expectations for Indicator 1e. The materials provide daily, brief instruction aligned to the scope and sequence, with lessons that address phoneme isolation, blending, segmentation, and substitution. Students receive explicit routines and modeling, and instruction incorporates opportunities to connect sounds to previously taught letters and spelling patterns. However, many blending routines rely on combining an initial phoneme with a larger word part rather than blending individual phonemes, which limits progression toward full phoneme-level blending. In addition, articulation guidance for accurate sound production appears only occasionally in Teacher Tips and is not systematically embedded across daily instruction.
Note: This indicator is analyzed at the lesson level to examine the instructional progression within and across lessons. Repeated references to a single week or lesson reflect the structured sequence of explicit instruction and guided practice, which is representative of how the materials support this skill throughout the year.
Daily phonemic awareness instruction aligns to the scope and sequence, progressing from isolation, blending, and segmenting to more advanced phoneme manipulations, with phoneme-grapheme correspondences introduced to connect sounds to letters.
In Unit 3, Lesson 1, Day 4, Phoneme Matching: Initial Sounds, using the Lion Puppet, the teacher explains that students will hear three spoken words and must determine which two begin with the same sound. The teacher says words such as sand, dog, and sun, and students identify sand and sun as sharing the initial /s/ sound. The teacher continues the routine with additional sets including sink, sack, big; rat, lip, rip; and sat, top, sock. Students listen to each word set, identify the shared initial phoneme, and respond orally to demonstrate phoneme matching.
In Unit 4, Lesson 1, Day 2, Phonological Awareness, the teacher models producing /h/, students repeat the sound, and the puppet supplies the remaining word part (e.g., ouse). Students blend the parts to say house. The routine continues with hand, hail, happy, and horse. Materials then direct the teacher to blend words beginning with /t/ using the same modeled routine. Students blend /t/ with word parts to form words such as ten, tell, taste, table, and time. In this routine, students blend the initial phoneme with the remaining part of the word, which may consist of multiple sounds.
In Unit 5, Lesson 1, Day 1, the teacher provides daily instruction in phoneme segmentation. The teacher directs students to listen carefully, gives each student three blocks, and says the word bat phoneme by phoneme. Students push a block forward for each sound they hear, beginning on the left, then touch each block while saying /b/, /a/, and /t/. After segmenting the sounds, students blend the phonemes to say bat and identify that the word contains three sounds. The teacher continues the routine with additional words such as at, bit, it, big, bag, bad, and bib. A Teacher Tip notes that students now apply block activities to individual phonemes using words with letters and sounds they have previously learned.
Although the materials offer daily instruction in phonological and phonemic awareness, blending routines frequently combine an initial phoneme with a larger word part, limiting progression toward full phoneme-level blending.
Materials include opportunities for students to practice connecting sounds to letters.
In Unit 5, Lesson 1, Day 1, Phoneme Segmentation, Teacher Tip in the Block Activities, the materials provide opportunities for students to connect sounds to letters as they segment words. The section explains that students previously learned to break words into parts and syllables and now apply the activity to break words into individual phonemes using familiar spellings. Students segment words such as bat, bit, big, bag, and bib, and each word includes sound–letter relationships already introduced in phonics. As students say each phoneme and identify the corresponding letter, they practice connecting the sounds they hear to the letters that represent those sounds.
In Unit 11, Lesson 1, Day 5, Phoneme Substitution, Medial and Final Sounds, students repeat a word such as like and then substitute the medial /ī/ with /ā/ to form lake. They continue with additional words, changing sounds in hat -> hit, sap -> sip, and mass -> miss. Students then practice final sound substitutions, such as map -> mad; lone -> load; pit -> pin.
Materials include limited directions to the teacher for demonstrating how to pronounce each phoneme (articulation/mouth formation).
In Unit 3, Lesson 2, Day 1, a Teacher Tip provides articulation guidance for the /d/ sound. The materials note that /d/ is a voiced sound and suggest having students feel the vibration in their throats as they pronounce it. The teacher is advised not to exaggerate the sound or add a vowel and to let students observe tongue placement behind the teeth while producing /d/.
In Unit 4, Lesson 1, Day 3, materials provide articulation guidance for producing /t/. The teacher is directed to demonstrate that /t/ is made with the tongue behind the teeth, say the sound several times while students watch, and then observe students as they produce /t/.
Although the materials include some articulation guidance these supports appear only occasionally and are not systematically embedded across daily phonics or phonemic awareness routines. As a result, teachers receive limited direction for modeling accurate pronunciation or mouth formation beyond these isolated examples.
Indicator 1f
Materials regularly and systematically offer assessment opportunities that measure student progress in phonemic awareness (as indicated by the program scope and sequence).
Materials provide a variety of assessment opportunities throughout the year (e.g., at least three times per year or aligned to key instructional benchmarks) to monitor student progress in phonemic awareness. Assessment types may include oral tasks, encoding assessments, decoding activities requiring phoneme manipulation, and teacher observations.
Assessment materials provide teachers-and, when appropriate, caregivers-with clear information about students’ current skill levels in phonemic awareness.
Materials support teachers with instructional suggestions or next steps based on assessment results to support student progress toward mastery.
The assessment opportunities for phonemic awareness in Open Court Reading partially meet expectations for Indicator 1f. The materials provide regular and systematic assessment opportunities to monitor student progress in phonemic awareness across the year, including embedded weekly tasks and formal benchmark assessments administered three times per year. The teacher is supported with student and class record sheets, proficiency guidelines, and defined mastery thresholds to track performance and document progress. Assessment materials also include home-connection letters in English and Spanish that communicate lesson objectives and skills to caregivers. However, while the materials provide general next-step guidance to reteach and assess phonemic awareness skills, support for differentiated instruction or targeted intervention based on assessment results are limited.
Note: This indicator is analyzed at the assessment level to examine how opportunities to measure phonemic awareness are structured and distributed across the year. Repeated references to specific weeks or tasks reflect embedded and recurring assessment structures that are representative of the program’s design for monitoring student progress over time.
Materials provide a variety of assessment opportunities throughout the year (e.g., at least three times per year or aligned to key instructional benchmarks) to monitor student progress in phonemic awareness. Assessment types may include oral tasks, encoding assessments, decoding activities requiring phoneme manipulation, and teacher observations.
In Unit 1, Lesson 1, Day 5, Monitor Progress, students complete an eActivity blending task that assesses their ability to blend phonemes to form words. Using an interactive platform, students drag markers into sound boxes, listen to each phoneme, and then blend the sounds together to identify the word, e.g., /h/ /e/ /l/ /p/ -> help. The activity records whether students correctly blended the sounds and identified the target words.
In Unit 5, Lesson 2, Day 5, Foundational Skills Assessment Recommendations, students complete a Phoneme Matching assessment in which the teacher says two words and students signal whether the words share the same initial sound, e.g., can/couch; ten/bed; sit/sat. A parallel task measures matching of final sounds, e.g., tab/tub; hall/hat; grin/grip.
In the Teacher Resources Assessment, Benchmark Assessment, phonemic awareness is assessed three times during the year: Test 1 after Unit 2 (week 6), Test 2 after Unit 6 (week 18), and Test 3 at the end of Unit 12 (week 34). Each assessment includes five oral blending items and five segmentation items administered one-on-one.
Assessment materials provide teachers-and, when appropriate, caregiver-with clear information about student’s current skill levels in phonemic awareness.
In the Teacher Resources, Assessment, Benchmark Assessment, the materials provide the teacher with directions for administration, spaces to record each students’ responses, and a proficiency section that defines mastery. Students who earn a perfect score on two consecutive benchmarks are marked proficient, and the teacher may award full points for that skill on future assessments while noting proficiency in the record.
In the Teacher Resources, Assessment, Lesson and Unit Assessment Book 1: Blackline Masters with Answer Key, the materials provide Class Assessment Records, that includes boxes to record data, e.g., Unit 6-Phoneme Manipulations: Initial and Final Sounds; Phoneme Blending, and Student Assessment Records that include fields for assessment name, date, number possible, number correct, percentage, and score. Materials establish performance expectations, for example, 4 out 5 correct or 80% accuracy is acceptable.
Materials support teachers with general instructional suggestions or next steps based on assessment results to support student progress toward mastery.
In Unit 8, Lesson 2, Day 5, Formal Assessment, Blending and Segmentation, the teacher is directed to first repeat the practice activity until students clearly understand the task. During the assessment, the teacher checks a box beside each word the student segments correctly and records totals on the student and class assessment records. The materials then provide next steps: “If any students do not reach the recommended performance level, repeat the assessment after intervention or additional instruction.
In the Teacher Resources, Assessment Lesson and Unit Assessment Book 1: Blackline Masters with Answer Key, the materials direct the teacher to respond when students do not meet recommended performance levels. The teacher is advised to repeat the assessment and after intervention or additional instruction. Some assessment lessons include extensions, for example, providing additional word pairs for phoneme matching, to give struggling students more practice opportunities.
This evidence shows that the materials provide the teacher with general next-step guidance to reteach and reassess phonemic awareness skills. However, the guidance for phonemic awareness is limited to repeating assessments after additional practice, without targeted instructional strategies or differentiated pathways.
Criterion 1.3: Phonics (Decoding and Encoding)
This criterion is non-negotiable. Materials must achieve a specified minimum score in this criterion to advance to the next gateway.
Materials emphasize explicit, systematic instruction of research-based and/or evidence-based phonics.
The Open Court Reading materials partially meet expectations for Criterion 1.3 by providing explicit, systematic instruction of research-based phonics that progresses from simple to complex skills. Instruction prioritizes high-utility letter–sound relationships and introduces phonics patterns in a deliberate, sequential order that supports early decoding development. Lessons introduce one new phonics skill at a time and include cumulative review, aligned spelling instruction, and frequent opportunities for students to apply skills through blending, dictation, and decoding connected text. Decodable texts align to the phonics scope and sequence and are used for multiple supported rereadings to reinforce accuracy and automaticity.
However, guidance for teacher modeling and assessment-based instructional adjustment is limited. While phonics routines are consistent, materials provide minimal embedded support for task-specific corrective feedback tied to common student errors. In addition, phonics assessments primarily measure decoding in isolation, with limited opportunities to assess application in connected text, and post-assessment recommendations remain general rather than clearly linked to specific performance patterns. Overall, phonics instruction is systematic and coherent, but limitations in instructional feedback and assessment use reduce the consistency with which instruction supports targeted mastery across the year.
Indicator 1g
Scope and sequence clearly delineate an intentional sequence in which phonics skills are to be taught, with a clear evidence-based explanation for the order of the sequence.
Materials contain a clear, evidence-based explanation for the expected sequence for teaching phonics skills.
Materials provide a cohesive, intentional phonics sequence, progressing from simple to more complex skills, with ample opportunities to apply skills through decoding in connected text.
Phonics instruction is based in high utility patterns and/or specific phonics generalizations.
The phonics scope and sequence in Open Court Reading meets the expectations for Indicator 1g. The materials provide a research-based, clearly defined sequence for phonics instruction. Instruction progresses systematically from letter-sound correspondences to more complex phonics patterns such as long vowels, consonant blends, and digraphs. The sequence emphasizes high-utility sound-spelling correspondences introduced in a clear developmental order, with frequent opportunities for students to apply skills through decoding and reading connected text. The order of instruction reflects a coherent progression from simple to complex, supporting the systematic development of foundational reading skills.
Materials contain a clear, evidence-based explanation for the expected sequence for teaching phonics skills.
In the Teacher Resources, Research in Action: The Science of Reading in Open Court Reading, the materials explain that learning to read depends on students’ phonological and phonemic awareness, and that explicit phonics instruction should begin in Kindergarten or Grade 1 following a developmental progression (Shaywitz, 2003; Stanovich, 1986; Mott & Rutherford, 2012; NICHD, 2000).
The overview states that instruction begins with common consonants and short vowels in Kindergarten, introduced through Alphabet Wall Sound Cards that link sounds to letters with pictures, action associations, and color coding.
Research cited in the materials (Moats, 1998; Adams, 1990; Nagy & Anderson, 1984; NICHD, 2000) highlights the importance of teaching high-utility sound-spelling correspondences in a clear, sequential order, moving from simpler to more complex patterns and connecting phonemes to print.
Materials provide a cohesive, intentional phonics sequence that progresses from simple to more complex skills and includes ample opportunities to apply skills through decoding in connected text.
According to the Scope and Sequence and Introduction to Letters and Sounds, phonics instruction in Kindergarten begins in Unit 10 after students have developed alphabet knowledge and phonemic awareness skills. The sequence introduces high-utility consonants and short vowels through word building, blending, and sentence extension activities, with immediate application in decodable texts. Instruction continues in Units 11-12, gradually adding additional consonants and vowels, consonant blends, and generalizations, while reinforcing skills through connected decodable reading.
Unit 3
Lesson 1: /s/ spelled s (initial and final); /m/ spelled m (initial and final).
Lesson 2: /d/ spelled d (initial and final); /p/ spelled p (initial and final).
Lesson 3: /ă/ spelled a; cumulative review of /s/, /m/, /ă/, /d/, /p/
Practice occurs in decodable (Sam and Pam)
Unit 4
Lesson 1: /h/ spelled h (initial); /t/ spelled t (initial and final). Review of /h/ and /t/
Lesson 2: /n/ spelled n (initial and final); /l/ spelled l (initial and final).
Lesson 3: /ĭ/ spelled i. Cumulative review of /h/, /t/, /n/, /l/, /i/
Practice occurs in decodables (A Hat; Nan and Lad; Tim in Sand)
Unit 5
Lesson 1: /b/ spelled b (initial and final); /k/ spelled c (initial /k/).
Lesson 2: /ŏ/ spelled o; /r/ spelled r (initial and final).
Lesson 3: /g/ spelled g (initial and final). Cumulative review of /b/, /k/ (spelled c), /ŏ/, /g/, /r/
Practice occurs in decodables (Cal Can Bat; Ron Hops; Glad Pam)
Unit 6
Lesson 1: /j/ spelled j (initial); /f/ spelled f (initial and final).
Lesson 2: /u/ spelled u; /ks/ spelled x.
Lesson 3: /z/ spelled z (initial); /z/ spelled s (final). Cumulative review of /j/, /f/, /ŭ/, /ks/, /z/
Practice occurs in decodables (Jam Pot; Bud and Max; Liz and Tad)
Unit 7
Lesson 1: /w/ spelled w (initial); /k/ spelled k (initial and final).
Lesson 2: /ĕ/ spelled e; /kw/ spelled q.
Lesson 3: /y/ spelled y (initial); /v/ spelled v (initial). Cumulative review of /w/, /k/ (spelled k), /ĕ/, /kw/, /y/, /v/
Practice occurs in decodables (Kim and Sam; Quin and the Jets; Vic Yelps)
Unit 8 – Introducing long vowels
Lesson 1: /ā/ spelled a, a_e (initial and medial)
Lesson 2: /ī/ spelled i, i_e (initial and medial)
Lesson 3: /ō/ spelled o, o_e (initial and medial)
Practice occurs in decodables (Jake Plants Grapes; Mike and Spike; An Old Flag)
Unit 9 – Continuing long vowels and cumulative review
Lesson 1: /ū/ spelled u, u_e (initial and medial)
Lesson 2: /ē/ spelled e, e_e (initial and medial)
Lesson 3: Cumulative review of short and long vowels: /a/ and /ā/, /i/ and /ī/, /o/ and /ō/, /u/ and /ū/, /e/ and /ē/
Practice occurs in decodables (Cute Little Mule; We Did It!; Steve)
Units 10–12
Phonics focus shifts to cumulative blending, reading, and application using previously taught sounds and spellings. No new sound–spelling correspondences are introduced in the curriculum at this point decodables provided; instruction emphasizes review and application.
Practice occurs in decodables (Nat Ran; Big Meg Can Help; Wet Bandit; Pine Lake; A Big Bike; A Box; Jake and Quin; Babe and I; The Fox and the Grapes)
Phonics instruction is based on high utility patterns and/or specific phonics generalizations.
According to the Scope and Sequence and Introduction to Letters and Sounds, instruction emphasizes single consonants (/m/, /t/, /s/, /p/), short vowels (/a/, /i/, /o/, /u/, /e/), and frequent digraphs (/ch/, /th/, /sh/), which represent the most common and transferable correspondences in English.
The sequence incorporates generalizable spelling patterns such as double consonants (ll, ss, ff) and long-vowel patterns (a_e, i_e), helping students apply consistent rules across multiple words.
The emphasis on high-frequency and generalizable sound-spelling patterns reflects research-based best practices for maximizing student success in early decoding.
Indicator 1h
Materials are absent of the three-cueing system.
Materials do not contain elements of instruction that are based on the three-cueing system for teaching decoding.
The materials’ exclusion of three-cueing strategies in Open Court Reading meets expectations for Indicator 1h. Materials do not include instructional language or routines that rely on the three-cueing system. Lessons focus on explicit instruction in phoneme-grapheme correspondences and phonics-based decoding. When students encounter unfamiliar words, instruction emphasizes attention to letter-sound relationships rather than relying on context or visual cues to guess the word.
Materials do not contain elements of instruction that are based on the three-cueing system for teaching decoding.
The materials do not contain elements of instruction that are based on the three-cueing system for teaching decoding.
Indicator 1i
Materials, questions, and tasks provide reasonable pacing where phonics (decoding and encoding) skills are taught one at a time and allot time where phonics skills are practiced to automaticity, with cumulative review.
Materials include reasonable pacing of newly-taught phonics skills.
The lesson plan design allots time to include sufficient student practice to work towards automaticity.
Materials contain distributed, cumulative, and interleaved opportunities for students to practice and review all previously learned grade-level phonics.
The pacing and practice opportunities of phonics instruction in Open Court Reading meet the expectations for Indicator 1i. The materials include a clearly structured and sequential progression in which each sound-spelling is introduced one at a time through explicit routines using Alphabet Sound Cards and connected blending and spelling activities. Lessons provide consistent opportunities for teacher modeling, guided practice, and independent application in reading and writing tasks. Instructional design allocates sufficient time for students to practice new sound-spelling relationships to accuracy and automaticity through oral blending, handwriting, and dictation routines. Materials also include regular distributed, cumulative, and interleaved review to reinforce mastery of previously taught skills across lessons and units.
Materials include reasonable pacing of newly taught phonics skills.
In the Teacher Resources, Research in Action, materials describe phonics instruction in Kindergarten as systematic and sequential, with sounds and spellings introduced one at a time in a clear order. Children connect sounds to letters using Alphabet Sound Wall Cards, and each newly taught skill is immediately applied in reading and writing tasks.
For example, in Unit 3, Lesson 3, Day 1, materials introduce the short a sound in isolation using the Alphabet Sound Card Short Aa with the “Introducing Sounds and Letters” routine. The lesson explicitly explains that vowels are special because every word requires a vowel, beginning instruction with short vowels for accessibility. Students listen to and repeat the /a/ sound multiple times, supported by the Lamb story that reinforces the connection between sound and letter. Instruction progresses to distinguishing between short and long a in spoken words (e.g., rack vs. rake) and linking the sound to spelling through word-building tasks with -ad (e.g., sad, pad, mad, dad). Students practice blending and adding initial consonants to create and read decodable words.
This pacing and structure is consistent across Kindergarten, with each new sound-spelling introduced in isolation, reinforced through decoding and encoding routines, and applied in connected reading and writing tasks.
The lesson plan design allots time to include sufficient student practice to work towards automaticity.
In Unit 3, Lesson 1, Day 3, Introducing the Sound of Mm, students engage with the Alphabet Sound Card Mm to connect the sound to its uppercase and lowercase forms, use word-pair activities (e.g., me/he) to identify which word begins with m, and reinforce recognition of the sound-symbol relationship through signaling and explanation. Additional written practice is included in Skills Practice 1, where students trace and write uppercase and lowercase M and m and identify pictures that begin with /m/.
In Unit 10, Lesson 3, Day 1, Dictation and Spelling, using the Sounds-in-Sequence Dictation Routine, students segment dictated words into sounds, reference the corresponding Alphabet Sound Cards for spellings, and write each word. Students then proofread their spellings against the teacher model, circling and correcting errors. Additional guided practice occurs in Skills Practice 2, where students blend and write words in context, work with partners to review accuracy, and revise by rewriting words for improvement.
Materials contain distributed, cumulative, and intervleaved opportunities for students to practice and review all previously learned grade-level phonics.
In Unit 4, Lesson 1, Day 5, Reviewing the Sounds of Hh and Tt, students revisit the sounds of Hh and Tt by echoing the sounds during the Alphabet Sound Card routine, then identify initial sounds in spoken words by signaling with Letter Cards. Additional cumulative practice occurs in Skills Practice 1, where students write the letters h and t and determine whether pictured words begin with /h/ or /t/. Opportunities for distributed review continue in Workshop activities, where students match Letter Cards to objects in the room, locate target letters in rhymes, and label drawings with the appropriate beginning sound.
In Unit 9, Lesson 3, Day 5, Reviewing the Short and Long Sounds of Ee, students revisit previously taught vowel sounds through the Alphabet Sound Card routine, chanting along with the short and long vowel rhyme. Using Letter Cards, students actively distinguish between /ĕ/ and /ē/ by signaling and pronouncing the correct sound when hearing words such as wet versus we. Additional practice occurs in the Whole-Word Blending Routine, where students segment, blend, and reread words with both short and long e spellings (e.g, bed, be), reinforcing recognition of the vowel sounds in multiple contexts.
Indicator 1j
Materials include systematic and explicit phonics instruction with repeated teacher modeling.
Materials contain explicit instructions for systematic and repeated teacher modeling of newly-taught phonics patterns.
Lessons include blending and segmenting practice using structured, consistent blending routines with teacher modeling.
Lessons include dictation of words and sentences using the newly-taught phonics pattern(s).
Materials include teacher guidance for corrective feedback when needed for students.
The phonics instruction in Open Court Reading partially meets the expectations for Indicator 1j. The materials provide clear, systematic modeling of sound-spelling correspondences through consistent routines. The teacher explicitly models how to connect sounds to print and guide students to apply new phonics patterns in word and sentence-level dictation. However, materials include only general corrective feedback through brief Teacher Tips that prompt reteaching or modeling of sounds and spellings. Common student errors are not embedded within lessons, and guidance for in-the-moment, task-specific feedback is limited.
Note: This indicator is analyzed at the lesson level to examine the instructional progression within and across lessons. Repeated references to a single week or lesson reflect the structured sequence of explicit instruction and guided practice, which is representative of how the materials support this skill throughout the year.
Materials contain explicit instructions for systematic and repeated teacher modeling of newly taught phonics patterns.
In Unit 11, Lesson 3, Day 5, materials provide explicit instructions for teacher modeling using Routine 6, Whole-Word Blending, and Routine 7, Sentence Blending. The teacher models blending with words such as box, wax, ham, and sob, demonstrating how to connect each sound to its spelling before student practice. Instruction continues with long-vowel words (e.g., bone, wake, home, base), where the teacher guides students in identifying the vowel patterns (o_e, a_e) and rereading the blended words naturally.
In Unit 12, Lesson 2, Day 1, Phonics, before blending words, the teacher points to Alphabet Sound Cards for Short e, Short u, b, d, f, l, n, p, r, s, and t and reviews each sound and letter, modeling accurate phoneme-grapheme connections. The lesson directs the teacher to display the word red, model sounding out /r/, /e/, and /d/, and use the blending motion to demonstrate how to combine the sounds to read the whole word. The teacher rereads the word to model fluent pronunciation before students repeat the routine. Materials instruct the teacher to repeat the same modeled routine with additional words such as sled, Ben, and bent.
Lessons include blending and segmenting practice using structured, consistent blending routines with teacher modeling.
In Unit 8, Lesson 1, Day 5, students participate in structured blending practice using Routine 3, Sound-by-Sound Blending, and Routine 5, Word Building. With teacher guidance, students blend both decodable words and word pairs (e.g., make/lake), segment sounds using Alphabet Cards, and apply the sound-symbol relationship in multiple contexts.
In Unit 12, Lesson 3, Day 5, Dictation and Spelling, materials including blending and segmenting practice using structured, consistent routines with teacher modeling. The teacher is guided to use Routine 9, the Sounds-in-Sequence Dictation Routine, to dictate words for students to write. The teacher says the word, uses it in a sentence, and repeats it. Students repeat the word, segment the sounds, and identify spellings using Alphabet Sound Cards. The teacher models each sound-spelling correspondence, prompting students to ask, "Which spelling for this sound?” as needed. Students write each sound in sequence, proofread, and compare their work to the modeled spelling displayed on the board.
Lessons include dictation of words and sentences using the newly taught phonics pattern(s).
In Unit 10, Lesson 3, Day 1, Dictation and Spelling, materials include Routine 9, the Sounds-in-Sequence Dictation Routine. The teacher dictates words such as map, yap, jab, and jam, prompting students to repeat each word, segment its sounds, and identify the corresponding spellings using Alphabet Sound Cards. Students then write the complete word, compare it against the teacher model, and correct errors by circling and rewriting.
In Unit 12, Lesson 2, Day 1, Dictation and Spelling, materials include Routine 10: Sentence Dictation Routine. The teacher dictates the sentence “I can rest on the bed.” one word at a time, following the Sounds-in-Sequence Dictation Routine. Students write each word, apply sound-spelling correspondences, and then proofread their sentences. The teacher guides students to check spelling, capitalization, and end punctuation.
Materials include general teacher guidance for corrective feedback when needed for students.
In Unit 8, Lesson 1, Day 5, Teacher Tip: Corrective Feedback, teacher guidance includes corrective feedback for encoding errors. If a word is misspelled, the teacher models the correct spelling, points back to the corresponding Alphabet Sound Cards, and has students rebuild the word step by step with Letter Cards. Students are then directed to rewrite the word correctly. This corrective feedback is general and applies broadly to spelling errors rather than offering task-specific guidance for particular phonics skills.
In Unit 11, Lesson 1, Day 4, Teacher Tip: Corrective feedback, teacher guidance includes corrective feedback for students who need additional support with sound/spelling correspondences and blending. The teacher says, “That word doesn't sound quite right. Let's blend the word again.” The teacher then models the sound that the student mispronounced. The teacher points to the letter, says the sound, and has the student repeat the sound. Then, the teacher uses the Sound-by-Sound Blending Routine to blend the word with students again. The materials direct the teacher to repeat the procedure with other words on the word lines for additional practice. This corrective feedback offers general support for mispronunciations or blending errors but does not provide guidance targeted to particular phonics patterns.
Materials provide only general guidance for corrective feedback. Common student errors are not consistently embedded within lesson routines, and teacher support for in-the-moment feedback is limited to brief side notes rather than explicit, task-specific guidance within the instructional steps.
Indicator 1k
Materials include frequent practice opportunities for students to decode and encode words that consist of common and newly-taught sound and spelling patterns.
Lessons provide students with regular opportunities to decode words with taught phonics patterns.
Lessons provide students with regular opportunities to encode words with taught phonics patterns.
Student-guided practice and independent practice of blending sounds using the sound-spelling pattern(s) are varied and frequent, supporting skill retention and automaticity.
Materials provide opportunities for students to engage in word-level decoding practice focused on accuracy and automaticity.
The decoding and encoding practice opportunities in Open Court Reading meet the expectations for Indicator 1k. The materials include frequent and varied opportunities for students to decode and encode words using common and newly taught sound-spelling patterns. Daily phonics lessons incorporate explicit teacher modeling, guided blending and dictation routines, and structured encoding tasks that reinforce letter-sound relationships. Students engage in regular practice decoding short- and long-vowel words and applying those same patterns in spelling through the Sounds-in-Sequence and Sentence Dictation routines. Lessons provide multiple opportunities for oral and written blending, rereading, and sentence-level application that promote accuracy, fluency, and automaticity with taught phonics skills.
Note: This indicator is analyzed at the lesson level to examine the instructional progression within and across lessons. Repeated references to a single week or lesson reflect the structured sequence of explicit instruction and guided practice, which is representative of how the materials support this skill throughout the year.
Lessons provide students with regular opportunities to decode words with taught phonics patterns.
In Unit 11, Lesson 1, Day 1, Blending, students use Routine 6, Whole-Word Blending and Routine 7, Sentence Blending to practice decoding words with short a and long a_e spelling patterns. The teacher displays each word, prompts students to sound out and blend phonemes (e.g., at, mat, sat, Sam, ate, mate, make), and guides them to reread the words naturally. Students identify the shared spelling pattern a_e and its long vowel sound /ā/,and then contrast short- and long-vowel pairs such as at/ate and mat/mate to reinforce decoding accuracy with new sound-spelling patterns.
In Unit 12, Lesson 1, Day 3, Blending, students use Routine 6, Whole-Word Blending and Routine 7, Sentence Blending to decode words with short u and long u_e patterns as well as words containing the two spellings of /k/ (c and k). The teacher displays each word, prompts students to sound out and blend the phonemes (for example, cast, crabs, cubs, bask, case, cakes, cubes, bake), and guides them to reread each word naturally. Students identify the shared vowel or consonant pattern and contrast pairs such as cubs/cubes to reinforce understanding of the role of final e in making the vowel long.
Lessons provide students with regular opportunities to encode words with taught phonics patterns.
In Unit 10, Lesson 1, Day 1, Dictation and Spelling, students apply the Sounds-in-Sequence Dictation Routine to encode words using previously taught sound-spelling correspondences (mats, maps, taps, pats). The teacher dictates each word, provides a sentence for context, and has students repeat the word aloud. Students identify the first sound, locate the corresponding Alphabet Sound Card, and record the spelling. After writing, students compare their spelling to the teacher model, circle any errors, and rewrite the corrected word. Differentiated guidance extends encoding practice through multisensory routines in which students use magnetic letters to form each dictated word before writing it. Students segment the words into individual phonemes and match each sound to its corresponding graphemes as they write.
In Unit 12, Lesson 1, Day 3, Dictation and Spelling, students apply the Sound-in-Sequence Dictation Routine 9 and Sentence Dictation Routine 10 to encode words using previously taught phonics patterns (cut, cute, rake, take). The teacher dictates each word, provides a sentence for context, and guides students to identify each phoneme and reference the corresponding Alphabet Sound Card before writing. Students proofread their work by comparing their spelling to the model and correct any errors. Sentence dictation extends encoding practice through application of capitalization and punctuation.
Student-guided practice and independent practice of blending sounds using the sound-spelling pattern(s) is varied and frequent.
In Unit 10, Lesson 1, Day 1, Guided Practice, students engage in blending words using previously taught sound-spelling correspondences. The teacher reads each word aloud from the sentence and supports students in orally blending the individual phonemes to form the complete word. Students repeat the process independently, blending each sound to decode the word before confirming accuracy. In partner work, students take turns blending words aloud and listening for accurate blending as their peers read the same words.
In Unit 11, Lesson 1, Day 1, Blending, students engage in varied and frequent blending practice using short a and long a_e patterns. Students first blend sounds within individual words using Whole-Word Blending, then apply the same routine to read a complete sentence, Sam sat on the mat. The Teacher Tip provides guidance to differentiate between whole-word and sound-by-sound blending based on student fluency needs.
Materials provide opportunities for students to engage in word-level decoding practice focused on accuracy and automaticity.
In Unit 11, Lesson 1, Day 1, Blending, students reread sentences containing target words (Sam sat on the mat) with natural expression and intonation. The lesson includes teacher guidance for supporting fluency, instructing the teacher to “drop back to sound-by-sound blending until students are able to blend with fluency.” These rereading and fluency supports emphasize decoding accuracy and build automaticity with taught sound-spelling patterns.
In Unit 12, Lesson 1, Day 3, Sentence Blending, students reread the sentence “The cakes were in the case” naturally, with expression and intonation. Teacher guidance directs rereading “until students are able to blend with fluency,” emphasizing both accuracy and automaticity. In the Developing Oral Language, the teacher prompts students to identify and extend sentences using words from the blending activity (for example, He has a cast on his right arm), encouraging fluent application of decoding within spoken language.
Indicator 1l
Spelling rules and generalizations are taught one at a time at a reasonable pace. Spelling words and generalizations are practiced to automaticity.
Spelling rules and generalizations are aligned to the phonics scope and sequence.
Materials include explanations for spelling of specific words or spelling rules.
Students have sufficient opportunities to practice spelling rules and generalizations.
The instruction and practice of spelling rules and generalizations in Open Court Reading meet expectations for Indicator 1l. Spelling instruction progresses systematically and aligns with the phonics scope and sequence, introducing sound-spelling correspondences and generalizations in a logical order. Materials provide explicit explanations of spelling rules and connect them directly to weekly dictation and practice activities. Students receive frequent, structured opportunities to apply these rules through modeled instruction, guided dictation, and independent writing. Routine-based instruction supports ongoing review and distributed practice, promoting accuracy and automaticity with grade-level spelling generalizations.
Spelling rules and generalizations are aligned to the phonics scope and sequence.
According to the Program Overview, the spelling lessons are organized around specific spelling patterns that progress from phonetic patterns to structural and meaning patterns in a logical sequence. Each week’s word list is derived from the Phonics and Fluency or Word Analysis skills taught in the Foundational Skills lessons, ensuring alignment between phonics instruction and spelling. The overview states that “students learn skills that directly apply to the spelling portion of each lesson,” and that sound-based spelling patterns are introduced first, followed by conventions such as adding endings and, later, morphological patterns.
In Unit 10, Lesson 1, Day 1, spelling words such as mats, maps, taps, and pats align to the phonics scope and sequence which emphasizes building and reading words using previously taught sounds and spellings.
In Unit 12, Lesson 2, Day 1, dictation instruction aligns to the scope and sequence by using the Sounds-in-Sequence Dictation Routine as students review the sounds and letters on the Alphabet Cards and apply them to words such as led, pen, ten, and unset, and to the sentence I can rest on the bed.
Materials include explanations for spelling of specific words or spelling rules.
In Unit 10, Lesson 1, Day 2, Dictation and Spelling, before dictation, the teacher explicitly reviews the spelling rule that s can represent the /z/ sound. The Teacher Tip directs the teacher to model this using the Alphabet Sound Cards and to display the letter s under the Zz card to reinforce the concept visually. During dictation, students are guided to say each sound, identify the matching sound-spelling card, and then write the spelling.
In Unit 11, Lesson 2, Day 1, Dictation and Spelling, before beginning the Sounds-in-Sequence Dictation routine, students are reminded that they “know two letter patterns, or spellings, for /ō/: o and o_e,” and the teacher clarifies that /ō/ is spelled with the letter o in the words post and most. This explanation connects directly to the dictation wordlist and reinforces the understanding that a single vowel sound can be represented by more than one spelling pattern.
Students have sufficient opportunities to practice spelling rules and generalizations.
In Unit 10, Lesson 1, Day 3, students receive multiple opportunities to practice spelling words through dictation, proofreading, and revision. After writing each dictated word, students compare their spellings to the model on the board, circle incorrect words, and rewrite them accurately. The Teacher Tip states that the activity, Alphabetical Order, extends practice by having students rewrite dictation words in a new context. Guided Practice on Skills Practice page provides additional sentence-level writing and proofreading tasks.
In Unit 12, Lesson 1, Day 1, Dictation and Spelling, during dictation, students practice writing each word sound by sound and receive immediate feedback as they check their spelling against the teacher model. The Sentence Dictation Routine extends this practice into connected text, allowing students to apply sound-spelling rules while writing complete sentences such as, “They resume the mule to go up.” Students proofread their own sentences, verifying capitalization, punctuation, and spelling of high-frequency words.
Indicator 1m
Materials include decodable texts with phonics aligned to the program’s scope and sequence and opportunities for students to use decodables for multiple readings.
Decodable texts reflect grade-level phonics patterns aligned to the program's scope and sequence.
Lessons include detailed plans for repeated readings of decodable texts to reinforce accuracy, automaticity, and confidence.
Reading practice occurs in decodable texts aligned to the taught phonics patterns and reflects absence of predictable texts. Use of decodable texts decreases over time as students demonstrate decoding proficiency and transition into increasingly complex texts.
The decodable texts and instructional routines in Open Court Reading meet the expectations for Indicator 1m. Beginning in Unit 10, when explicit phonics instruction is introduced, decodable texts align to the program’s phonics scope and sequence and provide opportunities for students to apply newly taught sound–spelling patterns in connected text. Lessons include structured routines for repeated readings that support accuracy, automaticity, and comprehension through teacher modeling, partner reading, and multiple rereading formats. As units progress, instruction appropriately incorporates increasingly complex text while continuing to reinforce decoding and fluency skills through controlled decodable reading.
Note: This indicator is analyzed at the lesson level to examine the instructional progression within and across lessons. Repeated references to a single week or lesson reflect the structured sequence of explicit instruction and guided practice, which is representative of how the materials support this skill throughout the year.
Decodable texts reflect grade-level phonics patterns aligned to the program’s scope and sequence.
In Unit 10, Lesson 1, Day 5, students read Core Decodable 20, Nat Ran, which introduces the high-frequency word then and reinforces previously taught words such as a, am, can, and see. The Sound-Spelling Correspondence in Decodables chart outlines the cumulative phonics sequence addressed across Decodable 20 (e.g., /s/, /m/, /d/, /p/, /a/ - /e/, /kw/ spelled qu -> long vowels a_e, i_e, o_e, u_e, e_e). The decodable story integrates these patterns into connected text to reinforce previously taught correspondences and high-frequency words, noting alignment to the program’s phonics scope and sequence.
In Unit 12, Lesson 3, Day 5, Reading a Decodable, students read Core Decodable 28, The Fox and the Grapes to apply phonics skills introduced earlier in the sequence, including long vowel spellings and consonant blends. The Sound-Spelling Correspondences in Decodables chart confirms that the decodable aligns to the cumulative scope and sequence, which progresses from single consonant and short vowel sounds to complex vowel spellings (e.g., long a_e, i_e, o_e, u_e, e_e) and final blends. Before reading, students review the high-frequency words has, her, we, there,the, she, can ,up, and, but, a, and be, reinforcing previously taught sight words in connected text.
Lessons include detailed plans for repeated readings of decodable texts to reinforce accuracy, automaticity, and confidence.
In Unit 10, Lesson 1, Day 5, Reading A Decodable, Core Decodable 20 Nat Ran, lesson guidance includes explicit directions for reading and rereading decodable texts. The teacher is directed to implement Routine 4, Reading a Decodable, which includes modeling fluent reading, having students read each page silently and aloud, and using multiple rereading approaches such as partner reading, choral reading, and turn-taking to build fluency and confidence. Students respond to comprehension questions, retell the story, and engage in vocabulary discussion after reading. The teacher is reminded to have students reread the decodable using varied formats to reinforce accuracy and automaticity.
In Unit 12, Lesson 3, Day 5, Reading a Decodable, Core Decodable 28, The Fox and the Grape, lesson guidance directs the teacher to implement Routine 4, Reading a Decodable, which provides a structured plan for repeated readings. Students browse the text, make predictions, and read each page silently and aloud while tracking print from left to right and top to bottom. The teacher models fluent reading and guide rereading through partner reading, choral reading, and turn-taking to strengthen fluency and confidence.Comprehension prompts and retelling activities follow the initial reading, giving students opportunities to revisit the text multiple times while discussing story events, vocabulary and high-frequency words. Students who need additional practice are assigned Practice Decodable 28, Zip, Zap, Blip to reinforce the same phonics patterns through extended reading and blending tasks.
Reading practice occurs in decodable texts aligned to the taught phonics patterns and reflects an absence of predictable texts. Use of decodable texts decreases over time as students demonstrate decoding proficiency and transition into increasingly complex texts.
In Unit 10, Lesson 1, Day 5, Reading a Decodable, Core Decodable 20, Nat Ran, reading practice is embedded in decodable stories that match the taught phonics patterns and high-frequency words, rather than relying on repetitive or predictable sentence frames. Students apply decoding skills in connected text that corresponds to explicit phonics instruction from earlier lessons. The Core Decodable 20 routine guides the teacher to review newly introduced and previously learned high-frequency words, have students read the story, locate specific words in context, and connect the story’s events to personal experiences. The decodable structure supports authentic reading practice and comprehension development without pattern guessing.
In Unit 12, Lesson 3, Day 5, Reading a Decodable, Core Decodable 28, The Fox and the Grape, reflects authentic application of taught phonics patterns and high-frequency words in connected text rather than reliance on repetitive or predictable sentence frames. Students apply decoding skills through routines that integrate word blending, rereading, and comprehension checks using words from the story (e.g., likes, grapes, jump, cannot). The blending and practice lists for the lesson (e.g., zap, yap, yams, flags, size, froze, zone) reinforce the same long-vowel and blend patterns represented in the decodables, supporting transfer between isolated practice and text reading.
Indicator 1n
Materials regularly and systematically offer assessment opportunities that measure student progress of phonics in- and out-of-context (as indicated by the program scope and sequence).
Materials regularly and systematically provide a variety of assessment opportunities over the course of the year to demonstrate students’ progress toward mastery and independence in phonics.
Assessment materials provide teachers and students with information concerning students’ current skills/level of understanding of phonics.
Materials support teachers with instructional suggestions for assessment-based steps to help students to progress toward mastery in phonics.
The phonics assessment opportunities in Open Court Reading partially meet expectations for Indicator 1n. Materials provide regular and systematic assessments across the year, including informal checks, lesson and unit assessments, and benchmark assessments that measure progress in key phonics components. Tools for scoring and tracking results support the teacher in monitoring student performance over time. However, the phonics assessments included in the program primarily measure decoding in isolation rather than in connected text. In addition, next-step recommendations offered after assessments are general and do not connect specific student performance results to specific reteach or intervention lessons. As a result, the teacher must determine appropriate follow-up instruction on their own, limiting the usefulness of assessment data for guiding targeted phonics support.
Materials regularly and systematically provide a variety of assessment opportunities over the course of the year to demonstrate students’ progress toward mastery and independence in phonics.
In Unit 10, Lesson 1, Day 5, Monitor Progress, Informal Assessment, students engage in digital eActivities and eGames to review and demonstrate phonics skills taught in the lesson. The blending activity directs students to drag red markers into sound boxes, listen to the individual phonemes, and then blend the sounds together to form words such as team, goat, tool, cramp, and note. This is considered an out of context assessment.
In Unit 10, Lesson 3, Day 5, Monitor Progress – Formal Assessment, students complete a phonics assessment that requires them to blend given letters to form words and manipulate letters to create new words. The teacher presents letter sequences such as m-a-t and s-i-t for students to blend, and prompts them to add a letter, such as s to pen, to form a new word. These tasks assess students’ ability to apply phoneme–grapheme correspondences and decode printed words in alignment with the program’s phonics scope and sequence. This is considered an out of context assessment.
According to the Benchmark Assessment Guide, three Benchmark Assessments are administered across the year - after Unit 2 (Week 6), Unit 6 (Week 18), and Unit 12 (Week 34). Each assessment includes a 100-Point Skills Battery sampling ten strands, including Oral Blending, Segmentation, and Phonics Word Reading. For example, in Test 1, tasks include one-on-one produced responses and group multiple-choice items, such as blending word parts (can + dle -> candle; /k/ + ite -> kite) and segmenting sounds (pot -> /p/ /o/ /t/). This is considered an out of context assessment.
Assessment materials provide teachers and students with information concerning students’ current skills/level of understanding of phonics.
According to the Benchmark Assessment Guide, each Benchmark Assessment includes a Benchmark Assessment Record and Tracking Chart for the teacher to record and monitor scores by strand, total 100-point battery score, and fluency results. The teacher documents performance on specific phonics components such as Phonics Word Reading (e.g., bad, lip, leg, fake, mule, dot, mud, bee, hike, vote) and Letter Sounds accuracy. These records enable the teacher to identify student strengths and needs within each phonics skill area and to visualize progress over time using the Benchmark Tracking Charts.
According to the Assessment Handbook, the teacher is encouraged to observe students as they complete regular classroom tasks to gather information about current skill levels. The handbook provides explicit observation guidance, recommending that the teacher monitors specific aspects of performance, such as blending accuracy and decoding fluency, during whole-class or small-group instruction. The teacher is advised to record observations systematically over a four- to five-day period to ensure that each student’s phonics progress is documented.
Materials support teachers with some instructional suggestions for assessment-based steps to help students to progress toward mastery in phonics.
According to the Assessment Handbook, Lesson Assessments and Benchmark Assessments include diagnostic information intended to inform next-step instruction. The teacher is directed to use Reteach Lessons for students approaching level, the Intervention Teacher’s Guide for those needing more intensive phonics support, and the English Learner Teacher’s Guide for students requiring language-based scaffolds. However, the guidance remains general and does not map specific assessment results to specific follow-up lessons. As a result, the teacher must independently determine which intervention or reteach lesson to implement, leading to inconsistent use of assessment data to guide targeted next steps.
Criterion 1.4: Word Recognition and Word Analysis
Materials and instruction support students in learning and practicing regularly and irregularly spelled words.
The Open Court Reading materials partially meet expectations for Criterion 1.4 by providing systematic instruction and practice to support students’ recognition and use of high-frequency words, with some attention to word analysis. Materials include consistent routines for introducing, reviewing, and practicing high-frequency words, and students regularly encounter these words in isolation and connected text, supporting the development of decoding automaticity. Instruction also includes limited opportunities for students to encode high-frequency words through dictation and sentence-level tasks.
However, explicit instruction in word analysis is limited in scope and consistency. Lessons do not regularly identify or model the distinction between regularly spelled and temporarily irregularly spelled parts of high-frequency words, and instruction emphasizes word use over word analysis. Opportunities for syllabication and morpheme analysis are introduced late in the Kindergarten year and are not distributed across the instructional sequence. While assessments regularly measure accuracy and fluency in word recognition, guidance for using assessment results to inform targeted, task-specific instructional next steps is general, and formal assessment of word analysis does not begin until Grade 2. Overall, materials support high-frequency word recognition and practice, but provide limited systematic instruction, application, and assessment of broader word analysis skills.
Indicator 1o
Materials include explicit instruction in identifying the regularly spelled part and the temporarily irregularly spelled part of words. High-frequency word instruction includes spiraling review.
Materials include systematic and explicit instruction of high-frequency words with an explicit and consistent instructional routine.
Materials include teacher modeling of the spelling and reading of high-frequency words that includes connecting the phonemes to the graphemes.
Materials include a sufficient quantity of high-frequency words for students to make reading progress.
The high-frequency word instruction in Open Court Reading partially meets the expectations for Indicator 1o. Materials include systematic routines for introducing high-frequency words, and students read, spell, and use these words in connected text throughout the year. However, lessons provide limited explicit modeling that connects phonemes to graphemes or identifies the regularly and temporarily irregularly spelled parts of high-frequency words. Instruction focuses primarily on reading and using the words in context rather than analyzing their orthographic patterns, reducing opportunities for students to make clear connections between sounds and their spellings.
Materials include systematic and explicit instruction of high-frequency words with an explicit and consistent instructional routine.
In Unit 1, Lesson 2, Day 2, High Frequency Word a, the materials direct the teacher to use Routine 8, the High-Frequency Words Routine, to introduce the word a. The teacher writes the word on the board, points to it, and says it aloud with students. Students then spell and read the word independently and use it to introduce names of familiar objects (for example, “a crayon,” “a hat”).
In Unit 6, Lesson 1, Day 5, the teacher uses Routine 8, the High-Frequency Words Routine, to introduce the word for. The teacher writes the word on the board, reads it aloud, uses it in a sentence, and guides students to spell and read the word several times. Students identify examples of for in environmental print and practice using the word in sentences with a partner.
Materials include limited teacher modeling of the spelling and reading of high-frequency words that includes connecting the phonemes to the graphemes.
In Unit 2, Lesson 1, Day 2, the materials direct the teacher to model the spelling and reading of the word had and it provides sentences using the word in context (for example, “She had a cold. The dog had a toy”). While the lesson includes modeling and application, it does not explicitly connect the phonemes /h/, /ă/, and /d/ to the graphemes.
In Unit 9, Lesson 3, Day 5, High-Frequency Word there, the teacher guides students to locate and read the word there in connected text and to distinguish it from other words such as here, “Have students point to and read aloud specific words, such as here and slim.” However, there is no explicit teacher modeling that connects the phonemes /th/, /ĕ/, and /air/ to the graphemes or explains the irregular vowel pattern within there.
Across lessons, teacher modeling focuses on reading and spelling high-frequency words in context, with limited explicit attention to connecting phonemes to graphemes or identifying irregular spellings. This reduces opportunities for students to develop clear links between sounds and their corresponding spellings during instruction.
Materials include a sufficient quantity of high-frequency words for students to make reading progress.
Kindergarten materials introduce 50 high-frequency words across ten units with instruction designed to support both isolated word recognition and sentence-level application.
High-frequency word instruction appears consistently across units, beginning with a, the, and go (Unit 1); had, he, I, see, has, you (Unit 2); we, of, am (Unit 3); at, to, as, have, in, is, it (Unit 4); can, his, him, on, did, girl (Unit 5); for, but, up, all (Unit 6); look, with, her, what, was, were (Unit 7); said, that, down, they, boy, out (Unit 8); do, little, be, she, there (Unit 9); and then, when, some (Unit 10).
Indicator 1p
Instructional opportunities are frequently built into the materials for students to practice and gain decoding automaticity of high-frequency words.
Students practice decoding high-frequency words in isolation.
Lessons provide students with frequent opportunities to decode high-frequency words in context.
Lessons provide students with frequent opportunities to encode high-frequency words in tasks, such as sentences, in order to promote automaticity of high-frequency words.
The instructional opportunities for high-frequency words in Open Court Reading meet expectations for Indicator 1p. Materials provide frequent and systematic opportunities for students to decode high-frequency words in isolation through a consistent instructional routine, as well as repeated opportunities to apply decoding in connected text through pre-decodable and decodable reading. Lessons also include explicit opportunities for students to encode high-frequency words through dictated writing and sentence-level tasks, supporting accurate spelling and application of words in context. Together, these routines support the development of accuracy and automaticity through both decoding and encoding of high-frequency words.
Note: This indicator is analyzed at the lesson level to examine the instructional progression within and across lessons. Repeated references to a single week or lesson reflect the structured sequence of explicit instruction and guided practice, which is representative of how the materials support this skill throughout the year.
Students practice decoding high-frequency words in isolation.
In Unit 1, Lesson 3, Day 2, High-Frequency Word and, students practice decoding the word in isolation through Routine 8. The teacher writes the word on the board, reads it aloud, and guides students to read and spell it together. Students repeat the word multiple times and add it to the class Word Bank, providing repeated opportunities to recognize and decode the word automatically outside of connected text.
In Unit 5, Lesson 2, Day 5, High-Frequency Words him and on, students practice decoding the words in isolation using Routine 8. The teacher writes each word on the board and guides students to read and spell the words multiple times. Students identify the letter–sound correspondences in each word (for example, /h/–h, /i/–i, /m/–m and /ŏ/–o, /n/–n) before reading the full words repeatedly for accuracy and automaticity. The new words are added to the class Word Bank, and students read previously learned high-frequency words to strengthen cumulative recognition.
Lessons provide students with frequent opportunities to decode high-frequency words in context.
In Unit 1, Lesson 3, Day 2, High-Frequency Word and, students apply decoding of the word and during the reading of Core Pre-Decodable 5, School. The teacher directs students to locate and within sentences and to reread it in connected text. Students point to and read the word as it appears in the story and participate in choral rereading, supporting accurate recognition of and within meaningful sentences.
In Unit 5, Lesson 2, Day 5, High-Frequency Words him, on, students apply decoding of him and on during the reading of Core Decodable 6, Ron Hops. The teacher prompts students to locate the words within connected text, reread them chorally, and point to them during shared reading. Students partner-read the story, identify the words him and on on specific pages, and answer comprehension questions requiring them to find and reread the words in context such as , “On what page does Ron hop on a ramp?” This guided practice provides repeated decoding of high-frequency words within meaningful sentences and stories.
Lessons provide students with opportunities to encode high-frequency words in tasks, such as sentences, in order to promote automaticity of high-frequency words.
In Unit 5, Lesson 2, Day 5, students encode the high-frequency words him and on using the High-Frequency Word Routine. During this routine, the teacher dictates each word, one letter at a time, and students write the word, supporting accurate spelling of newly introduced high-frequency words. The teacher then has students use each word in a sentence, and students generate and extend sentences that include the target words, for example, “I saw him on the playground.” Students work with partners to create additional sentences, supporting repeated application of the words in context.
In Unit 7, Lesson 1, Day 5, students work with the high-frequency words look and with as part of the High-Frequency Word Routine. Following introduction of each word, students generate sentences that include the new high-frequency words, such as “I look with my eyes” and “Look with Kim and Sam.” As students dictate their sentences, the teacher writes them on the board, and peers identify and circle the high-frequency words within each sentence. This process reinforces attention to the spelling of the words within connected text and supports encoding through guided sentence construction and visual identification.
Indicator 1q
Materials include explicit instruction in syllabication and morpheme analysis and provide students with practice opportunities to apply learning.
Materials contain explicit instruction of syllable types and syllable division that promote decoding and encoding of words.
Materials contain explicit instruction in morpheme analysis to decode unfamiliar words.
Multiple and varied opportunities are provided over the course of the year for students to learn, practice, and apply word analysis strategies.
The instructional opportunities for syllabication and morpheme analysis in Open Court Reading partially meet expectations for Indicator 1q. Materials provide students with opportunities to blend and analyze single-syllable and multisyllabic words and include explicit instruction in morpheme analysis through the introduction of prefixes such as re-and un-, supporting students in using word parts to derive meaning. However, while students blend multisyllabic words and compare vowel patterns, the materials do not include explicit instruction that names syllable types or teaches syllable division rules to support decoding and encoding. Additionally, opportunities to apply word analysis strategies are concentrated in Units 11 and 12 at the end of the Kindergarten year rather than distributed across the instructional year.
Note: This indicator is analyzed at the lesson level to examine the instructional progression within and across lessons. Repeated references to a single week or lesson reflect the structured sequence of explicit instruction and guided practice, which is representative of how the materials support this skill throughout the year.
Materials contain limited explicit instruction of syllable types and syllable division that promote decoding and encoding of words.
In Unit 11, Lesson 1, Day 3, students engage in whole-word and sentence blending activities using Routine 6, the Whole-Word Blending Routine, and Routine 7, the Sentence Blending Routine. Instruction focuses on blending single-syllable and multisyllabic words, including pat, tap, map, ape, tape, retape, and remade. Students contrast short and long vowel sounds in pairs such as tap and tape, and the teacher explicitly explains that the spelling pattern a_e signals the long vowel sound.
In Unit 12, Lesson 1, Day 1, students blend single-syllable and multisyllabic words using Routine 6, the Whole-Word Blending Routine, and Routine 7, the Sentence-Blending Routine. Students blend words including run, jump, plug, plus, cut, uncut, just, and unjust. Instruction focuses on identifying the short u vowel sound and blending words as whole units or by syllable for longer words.
While students blend multisyllabic words and compare vowel patterns, the materials do not include explicit instruction that names syllable types or teaches syllable division rules. Words such as retape, remade, just, unjust are blended as whole words rather than segmented or analyzed by syllable type or syllable boundary.
Materials contain explicit instruction in morpheme analysis to decode unfamiliar words.
In Unit 11, Lesson 1, Day 3, the teacher explicitly introduces the prefix re- and reviews its meaning as “again.” During word blending activities, students identify which words contain the prefix re- (for example, retape and remade) and explain the meaning of remade using the prefix meaning. This instruction connects word meaning to morphemic structure and supports students in decoding and understanding unfamiliar words that include the prefix.
In Unit 12, Lesson 1, Day 1, the teacher explicitly introduces the prefix un- and reviews its meaning as “not” or “opposite.” Students identify which blended words contain the prefix, including uncut and unjust, and apply the prefix meaning to support word understanding during blending activities.
Multiple and varied opportunities are provided over the course of the year for students to learn, practice, and apply word analysis strategies, however, these opportunities are concentrated at the end of the Kindergarten year.
In Unit 11, students engage in varied opportunities to apply word analysis strategies through word lines, sentence blending, and optional use of magnetic letters. During word blending activities, students blend and reread single-syllable words such as pat, tap, map, and ape, as well as multisyllabic words including retape and remade. Students contrast short and long vowel sounds in word pairs such as tap and tape and identify the spelling pattern a_e as signaling the long vowel sound. Students also apply these strategies while reading and rereading sentences that include previously introduced words, such as “Pam had to retape the map.” During sentence reading, students blend unfamiliar words as needed, reread the sentence naturally, and discuss word meaning, including identifying the prefix re- in retape and explaining its meaning.
In Unit 12, Lesson 1, Day 1, students apply word analysis strategies through multiple formats, including word lines and sentence blending. Students blend and reread words containing the short u vowel, apply prefix knowledge when reading multisyllabic words, and read and reread the sentence “We just run and jump!” using whole-word blending as needed. Students also read and spell high-frequency words we and and within the sentence.
These practice opportunities provide multiple formats for applying word analysis strategies within Unit 11 and Unit 12; however, they are concentrated at the end of the Kindergarten year rather than distributed across the full instructional year, as described in the scoring criteria.
Indicator 1r
Materials regularly and systematically offer assessment opportunities that measure student progress of word recognition and analysis (as indicated by the program scope and sequence).
Materials regularly and systematically provide a variety of assessment opportunities over the course of the year to demonstrate students’ progress toward mastery and independence of word recognition and analysis.
Assessment materials provide the teacher and students with information concerning students’ current skills/level of understanding of word recognition and word analysis.
Materials support the teacher with instructional suggestions for assessment-based steps to help students to progress toward mastery in word recognition and word analysis.
The assessment opportunities for word recognition and analysis in Open Court Reading partially meet expectations for Indicator 1r. Materials provide regular and systematic assessment opportunities to monitor student progress in word recognition through Benchmark Assessments and Lesson and Unit Assessments focused on high-frequency word reading, with defined accuracy thresholds. Assessment materials also provide teachers with information about students’ current performance, including accuracy and fluency. However, assessment-based instructional guidance is general rather than task-specific or systematic. While materials offer broad suggestions for responding to assessment results, they do not provide explicit decision-making pathways or clearly defined instructional steps tied to specific assessment outcomes. In addition, formal assessments of word analysis do not begin until Grade 2, limiting the extent to which Kindergarten materials assess or support progress in word analysis aligned to the scope and sequence.
Note: This indicator is analyzed at the assessment level to understand how opportunities to measure word recognition and analysis are structured and distributed across the year. Repeated references to weekly assessments and recurring routines reflect embedded, cumulative structures that are representative of the program’s approach to monitoring student progress and supporting responsive instruction over time.
Materials regularly and systematically offer assessment opportunities that measure student progress of word recognition and analysis (as indicated by the program scope and sequence).
Materials regularly and systematically provide some assessment opportunities over the course of the year to demonstrate students’ progress toward mastery and independence of word recognition and analysis.
According to the Benchmark Assessment guide, Benchmark Assessments are administered three times during the year and include Phonics Word Reading and High-Frequency Word Reading components. These assessments require students to read lists of phonetically regular words (for example, bad, lip, leg, fake, mule, dot, mud, bee, hike, vote) and high-frequency words (for example, and, then, when, the, but, go, in, have, his, it), with consistent formats used across Benchmark Tests 1, 2, and 3.
According to the Assessment Handbook Manual, Lesson and Unit Assessments include High-Frequency Word Reading tasks administered throughout instructional units. These assessments typically consist of five- or ten-word sets and, in some cases, include an automaticity rating. These assessments occur in Unit 2-6 High-Frequency Words.
According to the Assessment Handbook Manual, the materials state, “depending on the grade level, tested benchmark skills include the following: Word Analysis (Grades 2-5). Therefore formal Word Analysis Benchmarks begin in Grade 2.
Assessment materials provide the teacher and students with information concerning students’ current skills/level of understanding of word recognition and word analysis.
According to the Benchmark Assessment Guide, Benchmark assessment recording forms direct the teacher to circle words read incorrectly, note student strengths and weaknesses, document error types, and record self-corrections during Phonics Word Reading and High-Frequency Word Reading tasks.
According to the Lesson and Unit Assessment, TE, Book 1: Blackline Masters with Answer Key, Lesson and Unit Assessments include answer keys and defined performance expectations, such as minimum accuracy thresholds for five- and ten-word assessments and, in some cases, automaticity ratings.
Five-word assessments without an automaticity rating: 4 out of 5 words read correctly
Five-word assessments with an automaticity rating: 4 out of 6 points
Ten-word assessments: 8 out of 10 words read correctly
Materials support the teacher with some instructional suggestions for assessment-based steps to help students progress toward mastery in word recognition and word analysis.
According to the Lesson and Unit Assessment, TE, Book 1: Blackline Masters with Answer Key, High-Frequency Word assessment materials include defined performance expectations and guidance to support instructional decision-making. Assessments are based on five- or ten-word sets, with acceptable performance levels specified, including 4 out of 5 correct for five-word assessments, 4 out of 6 when an automaticity rating is included, and 8 out of 10 correct for ten-word assessments. Materials encourage repeated administration of these assessments until students can read the words accurately and automatically.
Assessment guidance also supports the teacher in examining student performance at the word level. Materials describe common patterns of performance and suggest instructional responses, such as providing additional practice with highly decodable words when students misread regular sound-spellings, focusing on less decodable high-frequency words when students demonstrate strong phonics skills but inconsistent word recognition, and using paired reading to support students who read slowly, hesitate, or frequently self-correct.
These suggestions provide general guidance for responding to assessment results related to accuracy and automaticity in word recognition.